Re: Electron's zitterbewegung
- From: DRLunsford <antimatter33@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 19:39:51 +0000 (UTC)
Dirk Bruere at Neopax wrote:
> Wasn't there some casual speculation once put forward that the reason c is a
> natural speed limit is because in reality everything moves at c, and that
> anything moving <c is actually an illusion caused by ZBW?
If you look at the matrix elements of y_0 y_i (Dirac's alphas) in a
free particle state, you get c. If you interpret alpha as the velocity
operator, this says that its expected value is c.
But y_0 y_i is not a Lorentz vector, rather, the "space/time"
components of a bivector (with the "space/space" components being y_i
y_j eps_ijk) and so, cannot represent the velocity of ponderable
matter. So you aren't really forming matrix elements of particle
velocity. (What are they? A phase velocity of interference between the
positive and negative energy components of a Dirac spinor.)
-drl
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Electron's zitterbewegung
- From: Eugene Stefanovich
- Re: Electron's zitterbewegung
- References:
- Electron's zitterbewegung
- From: Tony
- Re: Electron's zitterbewegung
- From: Dirk Bruere at Neopax
- Electron's zitterbewegung
- Prev by Date: Re: Conjecture on Baez's 'Quasar without a host galaxy'
- Next by Date: Re: Cluster growth
- Previous by thread: Re: Electron's zitterbewegung
- Next by thread: Re: Electron's zitterbewegung
- Index(es):