sci.physics.research
- Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly,
nebula331
- Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly, Dirk Bruere at Neopax
- Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?,
Jay R. Yablon
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, Igor Khavkine
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?, ramadanrama
- Re: Dark matter may not exist, Nicolaas Vroom
- Vector spherical harmonic question, Stephen Blake
- PAUSH [This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 223)], Chris Hillman
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 223),
Greg Egan
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 223), tessel
- Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 223), Igor Khavkine
- RL Mills' spreadsheet,
optionsgeek
- Re: RL Mills' spreadsheet, I.Vecchi
- Quantum F-D stats in 2-dimensions?,
stargene@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Quantum F-D stats in 2-dimensions?, Igor Khavkine
- Covariant Volume Integration and Stokes' / Gauss' Theorem in Curved Spacetime, Jay R. Yablon
- Unification question,
Mike Helland
- Re: Unification question, Hontas Farmer
- Pauli principle and relativity,
kvblake2003
- Re: Pauli principle and relativity, Igor Khavkine
- Stationary neutrinos,
frisbieinstein
- Re: Stationary neutrinos, Nick Maclaren
- muon catalyzed fusion, autotheist
- Molecular "cage" hoists atomic cargo, antimatter100
- Conformal divergence, DRLunsford
- normal force,
kupfer
- Re: normal force, Igor Khavkine
- Re: normal force,
ebunn
- Re: normal force, kupfer
- Re: normal force, Thomas Palm
- Re: normal force, Munir
- boson calculus and half inter spin? huh?,
cyberkatru
- Re: boson calculus and half inter spin? huh?,
Arnold Neumaier
- Re: boson calculus and half inter spin? huh?, Igor Khavkine
- Re: boson calculus and half inter spin? huh?,
Igor
- Re: boson calculus and half inter spin? huh?, johndevers
- Re: boson calculus and half inter spin? huh?, Igor Khavkine
- Re: boson calculus and half inter spin? huh?, Igor
- Re: boson calculus and half inter spin? huh?,
Arnold Neumaier
- Extensions of black-hole spacetimes,
David Baker
- Re: Extensions of black-hole spacetimes, tessel
- Re: Extensions of black-hole spacetimes, carlip-nospam
- Formal series solutions to systems of linear or non-linear DEs (Cauchy problem), kosovtsov
- earlier use of grassmann variables?,
Al . Rivero
- Re: earlier use of grassmann variables?, Arnold Neumaier
- Covariant CARs in Momentum Space?, strangerep
- Mass of star,
NILS BÖRJESSON
- Re: Mass of star, Ulf Torkelsson
- Maybe not even optimal results, just approximations.,
José Rui Faustino de Sousa
- Re: Maybe not even optimal results, just approximations., Arnold Neumaier
- Re: Maybe not even optimal results, just approximations., frisbieinstein
- Interesting variant of the double-slit experiment, Vonny N.
- Do I have any chance to get a postdoctoral position in quantum gravity?, Tanzing
- Research group needs your input, project . crossover
- gravity waves,
Rahman, Muzibur
- Re: gravity waves, Igor Khavkine
- Re: gravity waves,
Chris H. Fleming
- Re: gravity waves, René Meyer
- Re: gravity waves, Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
- Re: gravity waves,
tessel
- Re: gravity waves, Marcel LeBel
- Re: gravity waves, tessel
- Re: gravity waves,
Oz
- Re: gravity waves, tessel
- Re: gravity waves, Chris H. Fleming
- New thermodynamic description of elastic solids,
jozsef . garai
- Re: New thermodynamic description of elastic solids,
Igor Khavkine
- Re: New thermodynamic description of elastic solids, jozsef . garai
- Re: New thermodynamic description of elastic solids,
Igor Khavkine
- Re: Is general relativity incompatible with the Newtonian limit?,
Arnold Neumaier
- Re: Is general relativity incompatible with the Newtonian limit?,
Eugene Stefanovich
- Dirac on renormalization (was: Is general relativity incompatible...),
Arnold Neumaier
- Re: Dirac on renormalization (was: Is general relativity incompatible...), Eugene Stefanovich
- Re: Dirac on renormalization (was: Is general relativity incompatible...), Igor Khavkine
- Re: Dirac on renormalization, Arnold Neumaier
- Dirac on renormalization (was: Is general relativity incompatible...),
Arnold Neumaier
- Re: Is general relativity incompatible with the Newtonian limit?, Norm Dresner
- Re: Is general relativity incompatible with the Newtonian limit?,
Eugene Stefanovich
- Karl Hess (hidden variables),
Pieter Kuiper
- Re: Karl Hess (hidden variables),
René Meyer
- Re: Karl Hess (hidden variables),
Pieter Kuiper
- Re: Karl Hess (hidden variables), Chris H. Fleming
- Re: Karl Hess (hidden variables), p . kinsler
- Re: Karl Hess (hidden variables),
Pieter Kuiper
- Re: Karl Hess (hidden variables),
René Meyer
- Cosmology since 1972,
Andreas Moser
- Re: Cosmology since 1972,
Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: Cosmology since 1972, Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
- Re: Cosmology since 1972, alfansome
- Re: Cosmology since 1972,
Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Hydrogen in Relativistic QM,
Chris H. Fleming
- Re: Hydrogen in Relativistic QM, Eugene Stefanovich
- Re: Hydrogen in Relativistic QM, Georg M. von Hippel
- Re: Hydrogen in Relativistic QM, Igor Khavkine
- Re: Hydrogen in Relativistic QM,
Chris H. Fleming
- Re: Hydrogen in Relativistic QM,
Eugene Stefanovich
- Re: Hydrogen in Relativistic QM, Arnold Neumaier
- Re: Hydrogen in Relativistic QM, Eugene Stefanovich
- Re: Hydrogen in Relativistic QM, Arnold Neumaier
- Re: Hydrogen in Relativistic QM,
Eugene Stefanovich
- Re: Hydrogen in Relativistic QM, Chris H. Fleming
- Re: Hydrogen in Relativistic QM, Igor Khavkine
- 2005 Pioneer Anomaly Conference, Spud
- Accuracy vs. Relevance,
I.Vecchi
- Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance,
Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
- Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance,
I.Vecchi
- Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance, carlip-nospam
- Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance,
I.Vecchi
- Accuracy vs. Relevance, I.Vecchi
- Re: Accuracy vs. Relevance,
Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
- New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050),
Jay R. Yablon
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Tony
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050),
Igor Khavkine
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050),
DRLunsford
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Jay R. Yablon
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Jay R. Yablon
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Jay R. Yablon
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050),
DRLunsford
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050),
Igor Khavkine
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050),
Jay R. Yablon
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Igor Khavkine
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Jay R. Yablon
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050), Igor Khavkine
- Re: New Paper: General Relativity, Maxwell's Electrodynamics, and the Foundations of the Quantum Theory of Gravitation and Matter (gr-qc/0511050),
Jay R. Yablon
- Information about Michio Kaku ?,
PaoloB
- Re: Information about Michio Kaku ?, tessel
- Re: Information about Michio Kaku ?, David M. Palmer
- Re: Information about Michio Kaku ?, PaoloB
- Need help starting a presentation on Quatum Computing,
kenfitz3
- Re: Need help starting a presentation on Quatum Computing, Jan-Paul
- Re: Need help starting a presentation on Quatum Computing, yinzhangqi
- Re: Need help starting a presentation on Quatum Computing, Spud
- Re: Need help starting a presentation on Quatum Computing, Munir
- Re: Need help starting a presentation on Quatum Computing, Munir
- How to produce fast Neutrons,
Thomas Mueller
- Re: How to produce fast Neutrons, Uncle Al
- Re: How to produce fast Neutrons,
bhauth
- Re: How to produce fast Neutrons, Thomas Müller
- Re: How to produce fast Neutrons, Robert Komar
- applications leading to a normal eigenvalue problem,
rad_google
- Re: applications leading to a normal eigenvalue problem,
Igor Khavkine
- Re: applications leading to a normal eigenvalue problem, Arnold Neumaier
- Re: applications leading to a normal eigenvalue problem,
arp
- Re: applications leading to a normal eigenvalue problem, Arnold Neumaier
- Re: applications leading to a normal eigenvalue problem,
Igor Khavkine
- String theory is probably best left to pure mathematicians, Tony
- What would be the response of a string theorist...,
Tony
- Re: What would be the response of a string theorist..., alfansome
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: What would be the response of a string theorist..., Tonko Juricic
- Message not available
- Quantum gravity confusion redux,
I.Vecchi
- Re: Quantum gravity confusion redux,
Eugene Stefanovich
- Re: Quantum gravity confusion redux, Hontas Farmer
- Re: Quantum gravity confusion redux,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Quantum gravity confusion redux, Eugene Stefanovich
- Re: Quantum gravity confusion redux, Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Quantum gravity confusion redux, Eugene Stefanovich
- Re: Quantum gravity confusion redux, John Baez
- Re: Quantum gravity confusion redux, thomas_larsson_01
- Re: Quantum gravity confusion redux, I.Vecchi
- Re: Quantum gravity confusion redux,
Igor Khavkine
- Re: Quantum gravity confusion redux, Eugene Stefanovich
- Re: Quantum gravity confusion redux,
Eugene Stefanovich
- Re: Can spacetime collapse a wavefunction?, jambaugh
- What is quantum measurement problem?,
Tony012
- Re: What is quantum measurement problem?, Arnold Neumaier
- Re: What is quantum measurement problem?,
we_pretty
- Re: What is quantum measurement problem?, Eugene Stefanovich
- Re: What is quantum measurement problem?,
Cl . Massé
- Re: What is quantum measurement problem?,
Marcel LeBel
- Re: What is quantum measurement problem?, Cl . Massé
- Re: What is quantum measurement problem?, Marcel LeBel
- Re: What is quantum measurement problem?,
Chris H. Fleming
- Re: What is quantum measurement problem?, Cl . Massé
- Re: What is quantum measurement problem?, p . kinsler
- Re: What is quantum measurement problem?,
Marcel LeBel
- Re: What is quantum measurement problem?,
Chris H. Fleming
- Re: What is quantum measurement problem?, Cl . Massé
- Re: What is quantum measurement problem?, Chris H. Fleming
- Linear Forms on Inner Product Spaces,
David Park
- Re: Linear Forms on Inner Product Spaces, jambaugh
- Re: Linear Forms on Inner Product Spaces, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Linear Forms on Inner Product Spaces, Igor Khavkine
- Re: Linear Forms on Inner Product Spaces, Ioan
- Re: Linear Forms on Inner Product Spaces, David Park
- Re: illusory spatial dimension,
Douglas Eagleson
- Re: illusory spatial dimension, Marcel LeBel
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: illusory spatial dimension, Igor Khavkine
- Re: illusory spatial dimension, Tony
- Re: A hole on the roof... [optics],
Helmut Wabnig
- Re: A hole on the roof... [optics], Cl.Massé
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: A hole on the roof... [optics], Uncle Al
- How would this universe look if it had nontrivial topology?, Tony
- Quantum Mathematics at UCR, John Baez
- Death of elegance in physics ?,
Curious
- How does a prism work?, frisbieinstein
- p-forms and chirality,
andrea
- Re: p-forms and chirality, Robert C. Helling
- Why is the CKM matrix diagonal for leptons?, Souvik
- a naive question about killing vectors,
xiaoke
- Re: a naive question about killing vectors,
Jonathan Thornburg
- Re: a naive question about killing vectors,
Robert Low
- Re: a naive question about killing vectors, carlip-nospam
- Re: a naive question about killing vectors,
Robert Low
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: a naive question about killing vectors, Greg Egan
- Re: a naive question about killing vectors,
Jonathan Thornburg
- JOB: 2007 Fields program: postdoctoral positions, John Baez
- Re: sonar effects in whale strandings?,
Spud
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: sonar effects in whale strandings?, tessel
- Re: Redshift and energy conservation was Re: Dark Energy,
DRLunsford
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Redshift and energy conservation was Re: Dark Energy, Igor Khavkine
- Re: Four simple queries re a one-way light speed case,
Harry
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Four simple queries re a one-way light speed case, Blackbird
- Re: Electron's zitterbewegung, Monist__
- Re: discrete gauge transformation?,
Ilja Schmelzer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: discrete gauge transformation?, Phil
- Re: Redshift and energy conservation was Re: Dark Energy,
Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: Redshift and energy conservation was Re: Dark Energy, Michael C Price
- Re: Redshift and energy conservation was Re: Dark Energy, Michael C Price
- Re: Redshift and energy conservation was Re: Dark Energy, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Redshift and energy conservation was Re: Dark Energy,
Nick Maclaren
- Re: Redshift and energy conservation was Re: Dark Energy,
Eugene Stefanovich
- Re: Redshift and energy conservation was Re: Dark Energy, Nick Maclaren
- Re: Redshift and energy conservation was Re: Dark Energy,
Michael C Price
- Re: Redshift and energy conservation was Re: Dark Energy, Aaron Denney
- Re: Redshift and energy conservation was Re: Dark Energy, Michael C Price
- Re: Redshift and energy conservation was Re: Dark Energy, Michael C Price
- Re: Redshift and energy conservation was Re: Dark Energy, Aaron Denney
- Re: Redshift and energy conservation was Re: Dark Energy, Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Redshift and energy conservation was Re: Dark Energy,
Eugene Stefanovich
- Re: Redshift and energy conservation was Re: Dark Energy, Michael C Price
- Re: Query on the action for general relativity,
DRLunsford
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Query on the action for general relativity, Philip McSweeney
Loading