Re: Stationary neutrinos
- From: nmm1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Nick Maclaren)
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:43:25 +0000 (UTC)
In article <1132579804.993105.292340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
frisbieinstein@xxxxxxxxx writes:
|>
|> Since neutrinos have mass it is possible to produce a stationary
|> neutrino. I would guess that such would be more reactive than a
|> speeding neutrino since its clock would be "going much faster" than
|> that of a relativistic neutrino.
|>
|> True? What would happen then?
I was under the impression that the evidence for them having
mass is still very indirect, and that it is still a debatable
point. It would be interesting to hear educated speculations
about the properties of stationary neutrinos, but I rather doubt
that anyone can do more than speculate at this stage. If things
have clarified recently, I hope that someone will post what is
known.
I shall stop there, as there are already too many uneducated
speculations on Usenet :-)
Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
.
- References:
- Stationary neutrinos
- From: frisbieinstein
- Stationary neutrinos
- Prev by Date: Vector spherical harmonic question
- Next by Date: Re: boson calculus and half inter spin? huh?
- Previous by thread: Stationary neutrinos
- Next by thread: Pauli principle and relativity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
