sci.physics.research
- Hail, Democritus (Atomic Theory), DGoncz
- Any comments on "Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics" by Parthasarathy, Norm Dresner
- Looking for a fan in Physics, stanustcer
- Quantales (was: sheaves and topoi in physics), markwh04
- Re: What is quantum measurement problem?, markwh04
- This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 225), John Baez
- Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence ofRequiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Specialand General Coordinate Transformations?, Matej Pavsic
- QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?,
Robin Whittle
- QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?,
frisbieinstein
- Message not available
- Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?, Timo Nieminen
- Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?, Arnold Neumaier
- Message not available
- QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?,
frisbieinstein
- Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?, Charles Francis
- Re: QM without "photons" or Schrdinger's_wave_equation=3F?=, p . kinsler
- Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?, frisbieinstein
- Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation, C. M. Heard
- Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?, John Bell
- Re: Proper Frequency, Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Proper Frequency, markpalenik
- Re: Proper Frequency, David Park
- Re: Proper Frequency, Igor Khavkine
- Re: Proper Frequency, Murat Ozer
- Re: Minimum rotation of long carbon nanotube, Igor Khavkine
- Re: Is string theory in trouble?, markwh04
- Re: CBR & QCD, Alexey Popov
- Re: local flow of Euler characteristic,
Gerard Westendorp
- Re: local flow of Euler characteristic,
David Hillman
- Re: local flow of Euler characteristic, Gerard Westendorp
- Re: local flow of Euler characteristic,
David Hillman
- Re: Basic Unification Question, Jay R. Yablon
- Re: Basic Unification Question,
Igor Khavkine
- Re: Basic Unification Question,
Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: Basic Unification Question, Jay R. Yablon
- Re: Basic Unification Question,
Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: Basic Unification Question, Oz
- Re: Basic Unification Question, Igor Khavkine
- Re: Why Isn't a "Gluon Beam" Possible?,
Igor Khavkine
- Re: Why Isn't a "Gluon Beam" Possible?, frisbieinstein
- Re: Why Isn't a "Gluon Beam" Possible?, Jay R. Yablon
- Re: Lambda QCD,
Alexey Popov
- Re: Lambda QCD, Darth Sidious
- Re: Lambda QCD, Alexey Popov
- Re: R-\xi gauge with complex generators, René Meyer
- Re: Connection not a tensor..,
Robert Low
- Re: Connection not a tensor.., Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Connection not a tensor.., thomas_larsson_01
- Re: Connection not a tensor.., Igor Khavkine
- Re: Connection not a tensor.., George Hammond
- Re: Connection not a tensor..,
Charles Francis
- Re: Connection not a tensor.., Igor Khavkine
- Re: Magnetic Field of Finite Wire,
Igor Khavkine
- Re: Magnetic Field of Finite Wire,
RP
- Re: Magnetic Field of Finite Wire, Eugene Stefanovich
- Re: Magnetic Field of Finite Wire, Thomas Smid
- Re: Magnetic Field of Finite Wire, J. J. Lodder
- Re: Magnetic Field of Finite Wire,
RP
- Re: Magnetic Field of Finite Wire, Ralph Hartley
- Re: Magnetic Field of Finite Wire, Oz
- Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Nick Maclaren
- Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, tezzer
- Re: Quantum communication might be possible?,
Ralph Hartley
- Re: Quantum communication might be possible?,
primus
- Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Ralph Hartley
- Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Nick Maclaren
- Re: Quantum communication might be possible?,
primus
- Re: Quantum communication might be possible?,
frisbieinstein
- Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Ralph Hartley
- Re: Quantum communication might be possible?,
frisbieinstein
- Re: Quantum communication might be possible?,
Nick Maclaren
- Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, frisbieinstein
- Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Nick Maclaren
- Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, frisbieinstein
- Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Nick Maclaren
- Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, primus
- Re: Quantum communication might be possible?,
Nick Maclaren
- Re: Quantum communication might be possible?,
Greg Egan
- Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, jesper pedersen
- Re: normal force, ebunn
- Re: Justification for the quantum equilibrium hypothesis, Igor Khavkine
- Re: Justification for the quantum equilibrium hypothesis, Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Justification for the quantum equilibrium hypothesis, msleifer
- Re: Ratio Mu/Ru, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: Ratio Mu/Ru, WG
- Re: Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras, thomas_larsson_01
- Re: Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras, I.Vecchi
- Re: Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras, thomas_larsson_01
- Re: Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras, I.Vecchi
- Re: Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras, thomas_larsson_01
- Re: Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras, thomas_larsson_01
- Re: Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras, I.Vecchi
- Re: hypothetical air circulation, René Meyer
- Re: hypothetical air circulation, ianparker2
- Re: hypothetical air circulation, Thomas.Palm
- Re: Nair's QFT book,
physicistjedi
- Re: Nair's QFT book,
Hendrik van Hees
- Re: Nair's QFT book, strangerep
- Re: Nair's QFT book,
Hendrik van Hees
- Re: Nair's QFT book, jouvelot@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Nair's QFT book, richard miller
- Re: Nair's QFT book, jouvelot@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?, frisbieinstein
- Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?, Chris H. Fleming
- Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?, Hontas Farmer
- Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?, Nick Maclaren
- Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?, Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?,
robert bristow-johnson
- Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?, Kiviranta, Mikko
- Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
- Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?, DRLunsford
- Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?,
Andrey Akhmeteli
- Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?,
DRLunsford
- Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?, Andrey Akhmeteli
- Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?,
DRLunsford
- Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?, Eugene Stefanovich
- Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?, Souvik
- Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?, Mikko Kiviranta
- Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?, Cl.Massé
- Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?, Chris H. Fleming
- Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?, robert bristow-johnson
- Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?, Chris H. Fleming
- Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?, markwh04
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 2005 Pioneer Anomaly Conference, Spud
- Re: 2005 Pioneer Anomaly Conference, kurtan
- Re: 2005 Pioneer Anomaly Conference, Charles Francis
- Re: discrete physics, a network approach, Hontas Farmer
- Re: discrete physics, a network approach, gralp
- Re: discrete physics, a network approach, andybmt
- Re: discrete physics, a network approach, alfansome
- Re: discrete physics, a network approach, robert bristow-johnson
- Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?, Gerard Westendorp
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Dark matter may not exist, Kwok Man Hui
- Re: Dark matter may not exist,
DRLunsford
- Re: Dark matter may not exist, Nicolaas Vroom
- Re: Stationary neutrinos, Nick Maclaren
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Stationary neutrinos,
Neil
- Re: Stationary neutrinos,
Dirk Bruere at Neopax
- Re: Stationary neutrinos, Nick Maclaren
- Re: Stationary neutrinos, Dirk Bruere at Neopax
- Re: Stationary neutrinos,
Dirk Bruere at Neopax
- Re: Stationary neutrinos, strangerep
- Re: Stationary neutrinos, strangerep
- Re: Stationary neutrinos,
natelson
- Re: Stationary neutrinos, Nick Maclaren
- Re: Research papers, Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
- Re: Research papers, Harry
- Corrections, Stephen Parrott
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: How does a prism work?, Maarten van Reeuwijk
- Re: How does a prism work?, Chris Rohr
- Re: How does a prism work?, Chris Rohr
- Re: How does a prism work?, frisbieinstein
- Re: How does a prism work?,
frisbieinstein
- Re: How does a prism work?, Nick Maclaren
- Re: How does a prism work?, Chris Rohr
- Re: How does a prism work?, Joe Warner
Loading