sci.physics.research

• Thread Index

• Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?
  • From: John Bell
• Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation
  • From: C. M. Heard
• Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?
  • From: frisbieinstein
• Hail, Democritus (Atomic Theory)
  • From: DGoncz
• Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Any comments on "Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics" by Parthasarathy
  • From: Norm Dresner
• Looking for a fan in Physics
  • From: stanustcer
• Quantales (was: sheaves and topoi in physics)
  • From: markwh04
• Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: What is quantum measurement problem?
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
  • From: jesper pedersen
• Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: QM without "photons" or Schrdinger's_wave_equation=3F?=
  • From: p . kinsler
• Re: Philosophia experimentalis before Newton
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
  • From: Greg Egan
• Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?
  • From: Charles Francis
• This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 225)
  • From: John Baez
• Re: local flow of Euler characteristic
  • From: Gerard Westendorp
• Re: Minimum rotation of long carbon nanotube
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Proper Frequency
  • From: Murat Ozer
• QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?
  • From: frisbieinstein
• Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence ofRequiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Specialand General Coordinate Transformations?
  • From: Matej Pavsic
• Re: Proper Frequency
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: local flow of Euler characteristic
  • From: David Hillman
• Re: Proper Frequency
  • From: David Park
• Re: Proper Frequency
  • From: markpalenik
• Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?
  • From: Robin Whittle
• Re: Is string theory in trouble?
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Proper Frequency
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: Comparison of Gravitational waves with EM waves
  • From: tessel
• Philosophia experimentalis before Newton
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
  • From: frisbieinstein
• Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
  • From: primus
• Re: local flow of Euler characteristic
  • From: Gerard Westendorp
• Proper Frequency
  • From: Mike Helland
• Minimum rotation of long carbon nanotube
  • From: Ray Gardener
• Re: CBR & QCD
  • From: Alexey Popov
• Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Basic Unification Question
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Is string theory in trouble?
  • From: Jochen.Fromm
• Re: Basic Unification Question
  • From: Oz
• CBR & QCD
  • From: Charles Francis
• Re: Basic Unification Question
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
  • From: frisbieinstein
• Re: Why Isn't a "Gluon Beam" Possible?
  • From: frisbieinstein
• Re: Connection not a tensor..
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Basic Unification Question
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• local flow of Euler characteristic
  • From: David Hillman
• Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 223)
  • From: john_ramsden
• Re: Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras
  • From: thomas_larsson_01
• Re: Lambda QCD
  • From: Alexey Popov
• Re: Connection not a tensor..
  • From: Charles Francis
• Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras
  • From: thomas_larsson_01
• Re: Why Isn't a "Gluon Beam" Possible?
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Why Isn't a "Gluon Beam" Possible?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Basic Unification Question
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Lambda QCD
  • From: Darth Sidious
• Re: Basic Unification Question
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Connection not a tensor..
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
  • From: frisbieinstein
• Re: Connection not a tensor..
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: 2005 Pioneer Anomaly Conference
  • From: Charles Francis
• Re: Some Misconceptions In A PBS Einstein Biography
  • From: Harry
• Basic Unification Question
  • From: frisbieinstein
• Re: Connection not a tensor..
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Nair's QFT book
  • From: jouvelot@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
  • From: Ralph Hartley
• Re: Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: Connection not a tensor..
  • From: thomas_larsson_01
• Why Isn't a "Gluon Beam" Possible?
  • From: Radium
• Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Dark matter may not exist
  • From: Nicolaas Vroom
• Re: Stationary neutrinos
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Lambda QCD
  • From: Alexey Popov
• Re: 2005 Pioneer Anomaly Conference
  • From: kurtan
• Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
  • From: Ralph Hartley
• Some Misconceptions In A PBS Einstein Biography
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Nair's QFT book
  • From: strangerep
• Re: R-\xi gauge with complex generators
  • From: René Meyer
• Re: Magnetic Field of Finite Wire
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Magnetic Field of Finite Wire
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Lambda QCD
  • From: Darth Sidious
• Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
  • From: frisbieinstein
• Re: Connection not a tensor..
  • From: Robert Low
• R-\xi gauge with complex generators
  • From: jefortin
• Re: Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras
  • From: thomas_larsson_01
• Announcement: Experimental Chaos Conference
  • From: Lou Pecora
• Re: discrete physics, a network approach
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Justification for the quantum equilibrium hypothesis
  • From: msleifer
• Re: Nair's QFT book
  • From: richard miller
• Re: Stationary neutrinos
  • From: natelson
• Re: Ratio Mu/Ru
  • From: WG
• Re: Magnetic Field of Finite Wire
  • From: Oz
• Re: Stationary neutrinos
  • From: Dirk Bruere at Neopax
• Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: Magnetic Field of Finite Wire
  • From: Ralph Hartley
• Thermal fluctuations of space-time
  • From: Christophe
• Re: discrete physics, a network approach
  • From: tessel
• Connection not a tensor..
  • From: mike.james
• BS analogy for spin particles?
  • From: diogenes500
• Call for Papers - The Journal of American Science
  • From: lansing9992004
• Re: Magnetic Field of Finite Wire
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Magnetic Field of Finite Wire
  • From: RP
• Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
  • From: primus
• Re: Comparison of Gravitational waves with EM waves
  • From: tessel
• Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
  • From: Ralph Hartley
• Re: Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: Comparison of Gravitational waves with EM waves
  • From: ianparker2
• Re: Justification for the quantum equilibrium hypothesis
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Magnetic Field of Finite Wire
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: normal force
  • From: ebunn
• Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
  • From: tezzer
• Re: Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras
  • From: thomas_larsson_01
• Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
  • From: Chris H. Fleming
• Re: Justification for the quantum equilibrium hypothesis
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
  • From: Chris H. Fleming
• Origin of "Twin paradox"?
  • From: harrlin
• Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
  • From: Cl.Massé
• Re: Ratio Mu/Ru
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: Stationary neutrinos
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
  • From: Andrey Akhmeteli
• Re: Nair's QFT book
  • From: jouvelot@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Nair's QFT book
  • From: Hendrik van Hees
• Magnetic Field of Finite Wire
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Quantum communication might be possible?
  • From: primus
• Re: normal force
  • From: ebunn
• Justification for the quantum equilibrium hypothesis
  • From: Kanwarpreet Grewal
• Comparison of Gravitational waves with EM waves
  • From: ANS
• Re: discrete physics, a network approach
  • From: alfansome
• Re: Stationary neutrinos
  • From: Dirk Bruere at Neopax
• Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Ratio Mu/Ru
  • From: WG
• Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
  • From: Mikko Kiviranta
• Re: Dark matter may not exist
  • From: DRLunsford
• Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
  • From: Souvik
• Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
  • From: Kiviranta, Mikko
• Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: hypothetical air circulation
  • From: Thomas.Palm
• Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
  • From: DRLunsford
• Re: hypothetical air circulation
  • From: ianparker2
• Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras
  • From: DRLunsford
• Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: hypothetical air circulation
  • From: René Meyer
• Re: Nair's QFT book
  • From: physicistjedi
• Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
  • From: Andrey Akhmeteli
• hypothetical air circulation
  • From: sarahsbs
• Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
  • From: DRLunsford
• Nair's QFT book
  • From: jouvelot@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: 2005 Pioneer Anomaly Conference
  • From: Spud
• Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
  • From: Hontas Farmer
• Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
  • From: Chris H. Fleming
• Can we embed any knot group into a higher dimensional Poincare or
  • From: Kwok Man Hui
• Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
  • From: frisbieinstein
• Re: discrete physics, a network approach
  • From: andybmt
• no 'i' in Schroedinger?
  • From: David Macmanus
• Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly
  • From: Joe Warner
• Re: Research papers
  • From: Harry
• Energy Tensor Divergences and Gauss / Stokes in Curved Spacetime
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: How does a prism work?
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: discrete physics, a network approach
  • From: gralp
• Re: How does a prism work?
  • From: Joe Warner
• Re: 2005 Pioneer Anomaly Conference
  • From: jacques . fric
• Re: discrete physics, a network approach
  • From: Hontas Farmer
• Re: Stationary neutrinos
  • From: strangerep
• Re: Stationary neutrinos
  • From: strangerep
• Re: How does a prism work?
  • From: Chris Rohr
• discrete physics, a network approach
  • From: andybmt
• Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?
  • From: Gerard Westendorp
• Re: Dark matter may not exist
  • From: Kwok Man Hui
• Covariant Volume Integration II
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: boson calculus and half inter spin? huh?
  • From: johndevers
• Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?
  • From: andy everett
• Re: Research papers
  • From: Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
• Re: Stationary neutrinos
  • From: Nick Maclaren
• Re: How does a prism work?
  • From: frisbieinstein
• Re: How does a prism work?
  • From: frisbieinstein
• Re: Stationary neutrinos
  • From: Neil
• Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?
  • From: ramadanrama
• Corrections
  • From: Stephen Parrott
• ALPHA algorithm
  • From: kalium
• Re: Dark matter may not exist
  • From: I.Vecchi
• Re: Stationary neutrinos
  • From: Douglas Natelson
• Susy and flavour (IMO)
  • From: arivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: How does a prism work?
  • From: Chris Rohr
• Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Research papers
  • From: tolman
• Re: gravity waves
  • From: Marcel LeBel
• Re: How does a prism work?
  • From: Chris Rohr
• Re: How does a prism work?
  • From: Maarten van Reeuwijk
• Re: Covariant Volume Integration and Stokes' / Gauss' Theorem in Curved Spacetime
  • From: Stephen Parrott
• Re: How does a prism work?
  • From: John Clark

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint