sci.physics.research

Thread Index

Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?
- From: John Bell
Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation
- From: C. M. Heard
Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?
- From: frisbieinstein
Hail, Democritus (Atomic Theory)
- From: DGoncz
Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?
- From: Arnold Neumaier
Any comments on "Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics" by Parthasarathy
- From: Norm Dresner
Looking for a fan in Physics
- From: stanustcer
Quantales (was: sheaves and topoi in physics)
- From: markwh04
Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?
- From: Timo Nieminen
Re: What is quantum measurement problem?
- From: markwh04
Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
- From: jesper pedersen
Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
Re: QM without "photons" or Schrdinger's_wave_equation=3F?=
- From: p . kinsler
Re: Philosophia experimentalis before Newton
- From: I.Vecchi
Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
- From: Greg Egan
Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?
- From: Charles Francis
This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 225)
- From: John Baez
Re: local flow of Euler characteristic
- From: Gerard Westendorp
Re: Minimum rotation of long carbon nanotube
- From: Igor Khavkine
Re: Proper Frequency
- From: Murat Ozer
QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?
- From: frisbieinstein
Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence ofRequiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Specialand General Coordinate Transformations?
- From: Matej Pavsic
Re: Proper Frequency
- From: Igor Khavkine
Re: local flow of Euler characteristic
- From: David Hillman
Re: Proper Frequency
- From: David Park
Re: Proper Frequency
- From: markpalenik
Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
- From: Nick Maclaren
QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?
- From: Robin Whittle
Re: Is string theory in trouble?
- From: markwh04
Re: Proper Frequency
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
Re: Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras
- From: I.Vecchi
Re: Comparison of Gravitational waves with EM waves
- From: tessel
Philosophia experimentalis before Newton
- From: I.Vecchi
Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
- From: frisbieinstein
Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
- From: primus
Re: local flow of Euler characteristic
- From: Gerard Westendorp
Proper Frequency
- From: Mike Helland
Minimum rotation of long carbon nanotube
- From: Ray Gardener
Re: CBR & QCD
- From: Alexey Popov
Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
- From: Nick Maclaren
Re: Basic Unification Question
- From: Igor Khavkine
Is string theory in trouble?
- From: Jochen.Fromm
Re: Basic Unification Question
- From: Oz
CBR & QCD
- From: Charles Francis
Re: Basic Unification Question
- From: Jay R. Yablon
Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
- From: frisbieinstein
Re: Why Isn't a "Gluon Beam" Possible?
- From: frisbieinstein
Re: Connection not a tensor..
- From: Igor Khavkine
Re: Basic Unification Question
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
local flow of Euler characteristic
- From: David Hillman
Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 223)
- From: john_ramsden
Re: Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras
- From: thomas_larsson_01
Re: Lambda QCD
- From: Alexey Popov
Re: Connection not a tensor..
- From: Charles Francis
Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
- From: Nick Maclaren
Re: Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras
- From: thomas_larsson_01
Re: Why Isn't a "Gluon Beam" Possible?
- From: Jay R. Yablon
Re: Why Isn't a "Gluon Beam" Possible?
- From: Igor Khavkine
Re: Basic Unification Question
- From: Igor Khavkine
Re: Lambda QCD
- From: Darth Sidious
Re: Basic Unification Question
- From: Jay R. Yablon
Re: Connection not a tensor..
- From: Ken S. Tucker
Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
- From: frisbieinstein
Re: Connection not a tensor..
- From: George Hammond
Re: 2005 Pioneer Anomaly Conference
- From: Charles Francis
Re: Some Misconceptions In A PBS Einstein Biography
- From: Harry
Basic Unification Question
- From: frisbieinstein
Re: Connection not a tensor..
- From: Igor Khavkine
Re: Nair's QFT book
- From: jouvelot@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
- From: Ralph Hartley
Re: Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras
- From: I.Vecchi
Re: Connection not a tensor..
- From: thomas_larsson_01
Why Isn't a "Gluon Beam" Possible?
- From: Radium
Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
- From: markwh04
Re: Dark matter may not exist
- From: Nicolaas Vroom
Re: Stationary neutrinos
- From: Nick Maclaren
Re: Lambda QCD
- From: Alexey Popov
Re: 2005 Pioneer Anomaly Conference
- From: kurtan
Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
- From: Ralph Hartley
Some Misconceptions In A PBS Einstein Biography
- From: markwh04
Re: Nair's QFT book
- From: strangerep
Re: R-\xi gauge with complex generators
- From: René Meyer
Re: Magnetic Field of Finite Wire
- From: J. J. Lodder
Re: Magnetic Field of Finite Wire
- From: Eugene Stefanovich
Lambda QCD
- From: Darth Sidious
Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
- From: frisbieinstein
Re: Connection not a tensor..
- From: Robert Low
R-\xi gauge with complex generators
- From: jefortin
Re: Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras
- From: thomas_larsson_01
Announcement: Experimental Chaos Conference
- From: Lou Pecora
Re: discrete physics, a network approach
- From: robert bristow-johnson
Re: Justification for the quantum equilibrium hypothesis
- From: msleifer
Re: Nair's QFT book
- From: richard miller
Re: Stationary neutrinos
- From: natelson
Re: Ratio Mu/Ru
- From: WG
Re: Magnetic Field of Finite Wire
- From: Oz
Re: Stationary neutrinos
- From: Dirk Bruere at Neopax
Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
- From: Nick Maclaren
Re: Magnetic Field of Finite Wire
- From: Ralph Hartley
Thermal fluctuations of space-time
- From: Christophe
Re: discrete physics, a network approach
- From: tessel
Connection not a tensor..
- From: mike.james
BS analogy for spin particles?
- From: diogenes500
Call for Papers - The Journal of American Science
- From: lansing9992004
Re: Magnetic Field of Finite Wire
- From: Thomas Smid
Re: Magnetic Field of Finite Wire
- From: RP
Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
- From: primus
Re: Comparison of Gravitational waves with EM waves
- From: tessel
Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
- From: Ralph Hartley
Re: Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras
- From: I.Vecchi
Re: Comparison of Gravitational waves with EM waves
- From: ianparker2
Re: Justification for the quantum equilibrium hypothesis
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
Re: Magnetic Field of Finite Wire
- From: Igor Khavkine
Re: normal force
- From: ebunn
Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
- From: tezzer
Re: Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras
- From: thomas_larsson_01
Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
- From: Chris H. Fleming
Re: Justification for the quantum equilibrium hypothesis
- From: Igor Khavkine
Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
- From: robert bristow-johnson
Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
- From: Chris H. Fleming
Origin of "Twin paradox"?
- From: harrlin
Re: Quantum communication might be possible?
- From: Nick Maclaren
Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
- From: Cl.Massé
Re: Ratio Mu/Ru
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
Re: Stationary neutrinos
- From: Nick Maclaren
Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
- From: Andrey Akhmeteli
Re: Nair's QFT book
- From: jouvelot@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Nair's QFT book
- From: Hendrik van Hees
Magnetic Field of Finite Wire
- From: Thomas Smid
Quantum communication might be possible?
- From: primus
Re: normal force
- From: ebunn
Justification for the quantum equilibrium hypothesis
- From: Kanwarpreet Grewal
Comparison of Gravitational waves with EM waves
- From: ANS
Re: discrete physics, a network approach
- From: alfansome
Re: Stationary neutrinos
- From: Dirk Bruere at Neopax
Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
- From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
Ratio Mu/Ru
- From: WG
Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
- From: Mikko Kiviranta
Re: Dark matter may not exist
- From: DRLunsford
Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
- From: Souvik
Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
- From: Kiviranta, Mikko
Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: Tom Roberts
Re: hypothetical air circulation
- From: Thomas.Palm
Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
- From: DRLunsford
Re: hypothetical air circulation
- From: ianparker2
Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras
- From: DRLunsford
Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
- From: Eugene Stefanovich
Re: hypothetical air circulation
- From: René Meyer
Re: Nair's QFT book
- From: physicistjedi
Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
- From: Andrey Akhmeteli
hypothetical air circulation
- From: sarahsbs
Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
- From: DRLunsford
Nair's QFT book
- From: jouvelot@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
- From: robert bristow-johnson
Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
- From: Nick Maclaren
Re: 2005 Pioneer Anomaly Conference
- From: Spud
Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
- From: Hontas Farmer
Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
- From: Chris H. Fleming
Can we embed any knot group into a higher dimensional Poincare or
- From: Kwok Man Hui
Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?
- From: andy everett
Re: no 'i' in Schroedinger?
- From: frisbieinstein
Re: discrete physics, a network approach
- From: andybmt
no 'i' in Schroedinger?
- From: David Macmanus
Re: Mystery "solved": how honeybees fly
- From: Joe Warner
Re: Research papers
- From: Harry
Energy Tensor Divergences and Gauss / Stokes in Curved Spacetime
- From: Jay R. Yablon
Re: How does a prism work?
- From: Nick Maclaren
Re: discrete physics, a network approach
- From: gralp
Re: How does a prism work?
- From: Joe Warner
Re: 2005 Pioneer Anomaly Conference
- From: jacques . fric
Re: discrete physics, a network approach
- From: Hontas Farmer
Re: Stationary neutrinos
- From: strangerep
Re: Stationary neutrinos
- From: strangerep
Re: How does a prism work?
- From: Chris Rohr
discrete physics, a network approach
- From: andybmt
Re: Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?
- From: Gerard Westendorp
Re: Dark matter may not exist
- From: Kwok Man Hui
Covariant Volume Integration II
- From: Jay R. Yablon
Re: boson calculus and half inter spin? huh?
- From: johndevers
Velocity, density, ect. : air : molecules :: spinor field :?:?
- From: andy everett
Re: Research papers
- From: Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
Re: Stationary neutrinos
- From: Nick Maclaren
Re: How does a prism work?
- From: frisbieinstein
Re: How does a prism work?
- From: frisbieinstein
Re: Stationary neutrinos
- From: Neil
Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?
- From: ramadanrama
Corrections
- From: Stephen Parrott
ALPHA algorithm
- From: kalium
Re: Dark matter may not exist
- From: I.Vecchi
Re: Stationary neutrinos
- From: Douglas Natelson
Susy and flavour (IMO)
- From: arivero@xxxxxxxxx
Re: How does a prism work?
- From: Chris Rohr
Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence of Requiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Special and General Coordinate Transformations?
- From: Jay R. Yablon
Research papers
- From: tolman
Re: gravity waves
- From: Marcel LeBel
Re: How does a prism work?
- From: Chris Rohr
Re: How does a prism work?
- From: Maarten van Reeuwijk
Re: Covariant Volume Integration and Stokes' / Gauss' Theorem in Curved Spacetime
- From: Stephen Parrott
Re: How does a prism work?
- From: John Clark