Justification for the quantum equilibrium hypothesis
- From: Kanwarpreet Grewal <kanwar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 13:09:26 +0000 (UTC)
Hi,
I have been reading a few papers on Bohmian mechanics( or the de
Broglie-Bohm pilot wave
theory). Overall the theory looks very promising and inspiring.
However I have not come to terms with the "quantum equilibrium
hyphothesis".
I read Durr et al's paper "Quantum equilibrium and the Origin of
Absolute Uncertainty" but
I am not really convinced about the "quantum equilibrium hypothesis".
What is the status of this hypothesis and its justification? Any
pointers to recent papers/ideas
will be appreciated.
regards
kanwar
--
|======================================================|
Go, wondrous creature! mount where Science guides:
Go, measure earth, weigh air, and state the tides:
Instruct the planets in what orbs to run,
Correct old time and regulate the Sun;
|======================================================|
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Justification for the quantum equilibrium hypothesis
- From: msleifer
- Re: Justification for the quantum equilibrium hypothesis
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Justification for the quantum equilibrium hypothesis
- From: Igor Khavkine
- Re: Justification for the quantum equilibrium hypothesis
- Prev by Date: Comparison of Gravitational waves with EM waves
- Next by Date: Re: normal force
- Previous by thread: Comparison of Gravitational waves with EM waves
- Next by thread: Re: Justification for the quantum equilibrium hypothesis
- Index(es):