Re: Quantum communication might be possible?


Nick Maclaren wrote:
> In article <1134732055.995446.216520@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> <frisbieinstein@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >To sum up: The entanglement propagates at the speed of light. So you
> >can't use the entaglement to produce faster-than-light communication.
>
> Hmm. You have evidence for this statement, of course? :-)
>


This falls into the category of what I call "pragmatic laws." It
means, "No one has proved it can't be done, but the smartest people in
the world have had 50 years to figure this out and decided it can't be
done with what we have now. If you want to step up to the plate then
well and good, but maybe it would be better to work on something else
until some fundamental breakthrough changes the landscape."

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: segmentation fault in t_splay() calling Tcl_Alloc()
    ... | Let me first start this message by stating that I believe this to be ... | an error in gcc, ... Hmm... ... given the evidence you produced so far, ...
    (comp.lang.tcl)
  • Re: OT: Harry Potter (possible spoilers)(was Re: Sorry all ...)
    ... >> Hmm. ... I don't think Snape has turned. ... On the evidence we have so far, you have to commit an act of significant ... evil to create a horcrux. ...
    (uk.rec.cycling)
  • Re: No reason, just very cool.
    ... shorter than "when the wind blows", mind. ... Hmm. ... I recognised bits from Terminator II, and from "The Sum of ...
    (uk.rec.sheds)
  • Re: an interesting sum
    ... from 1 to infinity over that sum? ... If we had an algorithm for finding primefor all k, ... As far as I can remember, I have seen no evidence that you know ... The fact that a believer is happier than a sceptic is no more to the ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: matmul trouble
    ... It was sum. ... Hmm. ... Perhaps a pattern. ... sounding like compiler instalation issues again.. ...
    (comp.lang.fortran)