Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?
- From: "John Bell" <john.bell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:15:31 +0000 (UTC)
Ray Tomes wrote:
> frisbieinstein@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Robin Whittle wrote:
> >>What is the experimental evidence that emr is, in
> >>itself, quantitised?
>
> I don't believe that there is any experimental evidence that the e/m
> field (or radiation) is quantised, as distinguished from emission and
> absorption of e/m which is clearly demonstrated to be quantised.
>
Which is hardly surprising since it is impossible to perform a physical
experiment with neither matter to produce, nor matter to detect, the
radiation.
.
- References:
- QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?
- From: Robin Whittle
- QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?
- Prev by Date: Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation
- Previous by thread: Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation
- Next by thread: Re: Posted Draft Paper: Is Quantum Mechanics a Consequence ofRequiring The Laws of Nature in Integral Form to be Invariant Under Specialand General Coordinate Transformations?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|