sci.physics.research

• Date Index

• Looking for a concept, Kwok Man Hui
• The neutrino, Phil Gardner
  • Re: The neutrino, Hendrik van Hees
    • Re: The neutrino, Thomas Mueller
• Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Zach
• The Heim-Theory Research Group, Tim Murphy
  • Re: The Heim-Theory Research Group, John Reed
• Is this a common mistake in QM books?.., Cyberkatru
  • Re: Is this a common mistake in QM books?.., Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Is this a common mistake in QM books?.., Cyberkatru
      • Re: Is this a common mistake in QM books?.., Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Is this a common mistake in QM books?.., Mike Vaughn
  • Re: Is this a common mistake in QM books?.., Igor Khavkine
• Re: Gyroscope, frisbieinstein
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Gyroscope, Ralph Hartley
  • Re: Gyroscope, Daniel
    • Re: Gyroscope, DGoncz
• Re: gravitational-wave sources, tessel
• Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, tessel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, John Bell
    • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, tessel
  • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, John Bell
• Re: Higher-Order Terms in BCH Formula?, José Carlos Santos
• Time Dilation in a Gravitational Field in Feynman Lectures on Gravitation, Murat Ozer
• Re: the quantum hypothesis and blackbody radiation, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: the quantum hypothesis and blackbody radiation, Cyberkatru
  • Re: the quantum hypothesis and blackbody radiation, Alex
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: the quantum hypothesis and blackbody radiation, C. M. Heard
    • Re: the quantum hypothesis and blackbody radiation, Alex
  • Re: the quantum hypothesis and blackbody radiation, vagelford
• Penrose's new ideas on the big bang, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
  • Re: Penrose's new ideas on the big bang, DRLunsford
    • Re: Penrose's new ideas on the big bang, Jakob Rohrhirsch
    • Re: Penrose's new ideas on the big bang, Hendrik van Hees
  • Re: Penrose's new ideas on the big bang, carlip-nospam
  • Re: Penrose's new ideas on the big bang, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
  • Re: Penrose's new ideas on the big bang, island
  • Re: Penrose's new ideas on the big bang, Murat Ozer
  • Re: Penrose's new ideas on the big bang, Jay R. Yablon
    • Re: Penrose's new ideas on the big bang, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
  • Re: Penrose's new ideas on the big bang, Igor Khavkine
• commutators and translation operators, boris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: commutators and translation operators, DGoncz
• Homotopy classes appendix in Weinberg's QFT book, Part I, jouvelot@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• nonlocal effective action by integrating out fermions, Tom
  • Re: nonlocal effective action by integrating out fermions, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: nonlocal effective action by integrating out fermions, Tom
  • Re: nonlocal effective action by integrating out fermions, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: nonlocal effective action by integrating out fermions, René Meyer
• Entropy vs. Variance, yezi
  • Message not available
    • Re: Entropy vs. Variance, yezi
• CFP: The 2006 IAENG International Workshop on Scientific Computing and Computational Statistics, imecs__2006
• a new discrete model of quantum mechanics, Wolfgang Köhler
• Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
  • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Cl . Massé
    • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Cl . Massé
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Hendrik van Hees
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
  • Message not available
    • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, barry_adams
  • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, barry_adams
    • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
• Fermi's Paradox and DNA, Terry Pilling
  • Message not available
    • Re: Fermi's Paradox and DNA, Terry Pilling
      • Re: Fermi's Paradox and DNA, AndyCav
      • Re: Fermi's Paradox and Seti (was DNA), Terry Pilling
      • Re: Fermi's Paradox and Seti (was DNA), Dirk Bruere at Neopax
      • Re: Fermi's Paradox and DNA, ianparker2
      • Re: Fermi's Paradox and DNA, ianparker2
  • Re: Fermi's Paradox and DNA, Ralph Hartley
    • Re: Fermi's Paradox and DNA, Aaron Denney
  • Re: Fermi's Paradox and DNA, markwh04
• conjugacy classes in Lorentz/deSitter groups, John Baez
  • Re: conjugacy classes in Lorentz/deSitter groups, DRLunsford
• rotation of electron, georgie
  • Re: rotation of electron, FrediFizzx
  • Re: rotation of electron, Charles Francis
• orbitals, flowers, quantum puzzlement;, Cyberkatru
  • Re: orbitals, flowers, quantum puzzlement;, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: orbitals, flowers, quantum puzzlement;, Cyberkatru
      • Re: orbitals, flowers, quantum puzzlement;, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: orbitals, flowers, quantum puzzlement;, Ken S. Tucker
  • Message not available
    • Re: orbitals, flowers, quantum puzzlement;, Cyberkatru
      • Re: orbitals, flowers, quantum puzzlement;, Arnold Neumaier
  • Message not available
    • Re: orbitals, flowers, quantum puzzlement;, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: orbitals, flowers, quantum puzzlement;, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: orbitals, flowers, quantum puzzlement;, Ken S. Tucker
      • Re: orbitals, flowers, quantum puzzlement;, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: orbitals, flowers, quantum puzzlement;, Igor Khavkine
• Heim Theory furore, Joseph Voros
• Call for Papers: CSC'06 (part of WORLDCOMP'06), A. M. G. Solo
• A query regarding fractals!!!, SagarC.
  • Re: A query regarding fractals!!!, Lou Pecora
    • Re: A query regarding fractals!!!, Oz
• what physical mechanism causes space to expand?, teds@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: what physical mechanism causes space to expand?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: what physical mechanism causes space to expand?, I.Vecchi
    • Re: what physical mechanism causes space to expand?, ebunn
  • Re: what physical mechanism causes space to expand?, cmaj10
    • Re: what physical mechanism causes space to expand?, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• grounding question, gandiman
• Dirac's negative energy sea, planetology
  • Re: Dirac's negative energy sea, David Baker
  • Re: Dirac's negative energy sea, sjtjohnson2004
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Dirac's negative energy sea, island
• gauge transformations: local, global, large and asymptotically non-trivial, Darth Sidious
  • Re: gauge transformations: local, global, large and asymptotically non-trivial, thomas_larsson_01
    • Re: gauge transformations: local, global, large and asymptotically non-trivial, Darth Sidious
      • Re: gauge transformations: local, global, large and asymptotically non-trivial, thomas_larsson_01
• Is everything entangled, frisbieinstein
  • Re: Is everything entangled, Hontas Farmer
  • Re: Is everything entangled, gralp
• Isotropic tensor functions, Andrea
• entangled states, terry
  • Re: entangled states, winton
    • Re: entangled states, Nick Maclaren
  • Re: entangled states, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: entangled states, Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: entangled states, Andreas Most
      • Re: entangled states, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: entangled states, Andreas Most
      • Re: entangled states, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: entangled states, Andreas Most
      • Re: entangled states, Ilja Schmelzer
    • Re: entangled states, Nick Maclaren
  • Re: entangled states, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: entangled states, Nick Maclaren
    • Re: entangled states, Terry Pilling
      • Re: Re: entangled states, Hendrik van Hees
      • Re: Re: entangled states, Terry Pilling
      • Re: Re: entangled states, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: entangled states, Andreas Most
      • Re: entangled states, Hendrik van Hees
      • Re: entangled states, Andreas Most
      • Re: entangled states, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: entangled states, Hendrik van Hees
      • Message not available
      • Re: entangled states, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: entangled states, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: entangled states, Hendrik van Hees
      • Message not available
      • Re: entangled states, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: entangled states, Andreas Most
      • Re: entangled states, Hendrik van Hees
      • Re: entangled states, Andreas Most
      • Re: entangled states, Hendrik van Hees
      • Message not available
      • Re: entangled states, Hendrik van Hees
      • Re: entangled states, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: entangled states, Hendrik van Hees
      • Re: entangled states, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: entangled states, Ralph Hartley
    • Re: entangled states, Ilja Schmelzer
  • Re: entangled states, Ilja Schmelzer
    • Re: entangled states, Nick Maclaren
  • Re: entangled states, Blackbird
  • Message not available
    • Re: entangled states, Ilja Schmelzer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: entangled states, Ilja Schmelzer
• S-matrix in conformal field theories, Darth Sidious
• Charge on a neutral atom, Bruno
• Charged Clocks in a Static Electric Field, Murat Ozer
  • Re: Charged Clocks in a Static Electric Field, Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
    • Re: Charged Clocks in a Static Electric Field, Murat Ozer
  • Re: Charged Clocks in a Static Electric Field, Harry
  • Re: Charged Clocks in a Static Electric Field, Murat Ozer
  • Re: Charged Clocks in a Static Electric Field, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Charged Clocks in a Static Electric Field, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Charged Clocks in a Static Electric Field, Douglas Eagleson
  • Re: Charged Clocks in a Static Electric Field, Ralph Loader
• Re: Thermal fluctuations of space-time, John Schutkeker
  • Re: Thermal fluctuations of space-time, tessel
• Re: Why Isn't a "Gluon Beam" Possible?, John Schutkeker
  • Re: Why Isn't a "Gluon Beam" Possible?, Ulf Torkelsson
• Falling in water, pekkajarvela
  • Re: Falling in water, Ulf Torkelsson
  • Re: Falling in water, Chris Rohr
  • Re: Falling in water, Richard Saam
• Heim, Dirk Bruere at Neopax
• Re: About LHC, Tom Roberts
  • Re: About LHC, John Schutkeker
• Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation, Caroline Thompson
  • Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation, John Bell
• Human Power Generation to 140 watts and more (www video), DGoncz
  • Re: Human Power Generation to 140 watts and more (www video), DGoncz
• Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 224), Greg Egan
• Triplet paradox, skearney
  • Re: Triplet paradox, Timo Nieminen
    • Re: Triplet paradox, skearney
  • Re: Triplet paradox, a student
    • Re: Triplet paradox, skearney
  • Re: Triplet paradox, Timo Nieminen
• Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, John Baez
  • Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, I.Vecchi
  • Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, markwh04
  • Message not available
    • Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, I.Vecchi
      • Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, Terry Pilling
  • Message not available
    • Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, ebunn
      • Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, Richard Saam
      • Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, Ken S. Tucker
  • Message not available
    • Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, robert bristow-johnson
• building statistical thermodynamics from cellular automata, Alex
  • Re: building statistical thermodynamics from cellular automata, Bruno
• Re: Question for Thomas Larsson re Virasoro algebras, thomas_larsson_01
• de Broglie waves, David Macmanus
  • Re: de Broglie waves, Cl.Massé
• A theoretical physics FAQ, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: A theoretical physics FAQ, markwh04
• BEC-BCS crossover, Gao Meng
• Re: What is quantum measurement problem?, Aaron Denney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What is quantum measurement problem?, Cl . Massé
• Re: Morris & Black Holes, markwh04
• any comments @ Greiner Walter's statistic physics and the, jackchen1021
  • Re: any comments @ Greiner Walter's statistic physics and the, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: any comments @ Greiner Walter's statistic physics and the, strangerep
  • Re: any comments @ Greiner Walter's statistic physics and the, René Meyer
• What to make of the supposed observation of a Cosmic String., Hontas Farmer
• Scientific Visualization software programs, Jake
• Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Greg Egan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Nick Maclaren
  • Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Nick Maclaren
  • Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Greg Egan
    • Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Nick Maclaren
  • Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Alain Stalder
    • Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, primus
  • Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Greg Egan
  • Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Greg Egan
    • Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Nick Maclaren
  • Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Greg Egan
    • Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Nick Maclaren
      • Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Ralph Hartley
    • Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Greg Egan
  • Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Greg Egan
• Re: Proper Frequency, Tom Roberts
• Momentum and energy in presence of curvature or..., Cyberkatru
• Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 225), Michael Murray
• Does it converge?, eulersauntie
• Re: QM without "photons" or Schrödinger's wave equation?, Igor Khavkine
• Nuclear fusion, Kris Oddson
  • Re: Nuclear fusion, Cl . Massé
  • Re: Nuclear fusion, Dirk Bruere at Neopax
  • Re: Nuclear fusion, Chris Rohr
  • Re: Nuclear fusion, I.Vecchi
  • Re: Nuclear fusion, ianparker2
    • Re: Nuclear fusion, Dirk Bruere at Neopax
      • Re: Nuclear fusion, John Schutkeker
      • Re: Nuclear fusion, Dirk Bruere at Neopax
• Re: QM without "photons" or Schr?dinger's wave equation, p . kinsler
  • Re: QM without "photons" or Schr?dinger's wave equation, C. M. Heard
    • Re: QM without "photons" or Schr?dinger's wave equation, Andrey Akhmeteli
      • Re: QM without "photons" or Schr?dinger's wave equation, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: QM without "photons" or Schr?dinger's wave equation, Andrey Akhmeteli
      • Re: QM without "photons" or Schr?dinger's wave equation, Andrey Akhmeteli
    • Re: QM without "photons" or Schr?dinger's wave equation, p . kinsler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: QM without "photons" or Schr?dinger's wave equation, frisbieinstein
• one or many particles?, Cyberkatru
  • Re: one or many particles?, Charles Francis
    • Re: one or many particles?, p . kinsler
      • Re: one or many particles?, Cyberkatru
      • Re: one or many particles?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: one or many particles?, Cl.Massé
  • Re: one or many particles?, Oz
    • Re: one or many particles?, p . kinsler
      • Re: one or many particles?, Oz
  • Re: one or many particles?, Hendrik van Hees
    • Re: one or many particles?, Arnold Neumaier

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint