Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model

"J.C. Yoon" <jcyoon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
dr3pn0$t3r$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> Yes, my article is clearly based on the fundamentality of Dirac equations.
>
> In fact, what your statement implies the idea that the Dirac equations are
> not completely fundamental equations to determine the properties of
> fermions, but it requires some other explanation of Higgs field. If that
> is where the SM stands at, then it should Cleary state that "the Dirac
> equation is not fundamental, but the Higgs mechanism is more fundamental
> one",
> but no where in the SM makes such a clear statement.
> Do you agree that the SM denies the fundamentality of the Dirac equations?

That's not the point. What you say is the SM isn't Lorentz covariant. To
address this issue, we have to take only the definition of Lorentz
invariance, and the SM model, which is a system of coupled equations, some
of them being Dirac equations. The fundamentality here is only a
philosophical term, and is irrelevant since the SM and the Lorentz
covariance are mathematically precisely defined.

--
~~~~ clmasse on free F-country
Liberty, Equality, Profitability.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
    ... my article is clearly based on the fundamentality of Dirac equations. ... Higgs mechanism has been upheld so far. ... you are reasoning with the Dirac equation only. ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
    ... not stated it in this way, it is a Lorentz violation. ... "The fundamentality of the Dirac equations" means that "the fermions ... then it is just an "ordinary" approximation. ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
    ... In order to verify the Lorentz covariance of theory, ... If your massive fermion does not have a property of massive ... if fermions do not obey the Dirac equations. ...
    (sci.physics.research)