Re: Mass vs distance
- From: "paulaireilly" <paulaireilly@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:56:23 +0000 (UTC)
Could it be excluded that the Hubble red shift and the greater than expected
rotation rate and implied increased mass of distant galaxies could be
explained by mass decreasing with time?
No. Cosmological redshift would go with an *increase* in particle
masses over time, if that is what you mean by "mass decreasing
with time".
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mass vs distance
- From: Ian Macmillan
- Re: Mass vs distance
- References:
- Mass vs distance
- From: Ian Macmillan
- Mass vs distance
- Prev by Date: Re: Atomic orbital structure
- Next by Date: Re: Radiation's equivalence principle
- Previous by thread: Re: Mass vs distance
- Next by thread: Re: Mass vs distance
- Index(es):
