why eta'(958)?

From: "arivero@xxxxxxxxx" <Al.Rivero@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 02:46:53 +0000 (UTC)

Can anyone clarify me why the eta' is named with a mass in parenthesis?
I believe this notation is reserved for particles decaying strongly,
wasn't it? On the contrary, eta_c does not carry parenthesis in the
name, nor eta nor pi of course. So?

Alejandro

.

Prev by Date: Re: rest mass/relativistic mass question
Next by Date: Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
Previous by thread: Life in the Cosmos
Next by thread: Radiation reaction for a uniformly accelerated charge
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: About those parenthesis....
... > I like parenthesis and prefix from beginning. ... I have programmed with Lisp-like semantics using the fsyntax. ... The fnotation has no nice way to denote the empty list, ... So, in summary, fis an abomination that rightfully deserves ...
(comp.lang.lisp)
Re: a^b^c ?
... there is the simpler notation => c. ... so it is not important put parenthesis ... for say the true i wrote a big copybook [quaderno] ...
(alt.lang.asm)
Re: leptons, pions and QCD SSB
... >> a first principles estimation of the pion constant. ... Some people likes to quote Weinberg "The Problem of Mass", ... I was, wrongly, thinking that the glue should give ... So the eta and eta' still should ...
(sci.physics.research)