sci.physics.research

• Date Index

---

• Properties of Magnetic Materials, Lester Lapsus
• The Second Law of Thermodynamics says "god" doesn't throw dice..., island
• algebra of Kreimer-Connes renormalization, urs schreiber
• [String-schools] next "Saalburg" school, Gabriele Honecker
• What is a "nuclear flame"?, Radium
• Job: Senior Lecturer & Research Fellows in Quantum Information Science (Theory), Jason . Twamley
• The measurement postulate, Mike Helland
• P. Milloni and his paper, Naos
  • Re: P. Milonni and his paper, ebunn
  • Re: P. Milloni and his paper, a student
• Re: QM without "photons" or Schr?dinger's wave equation, Andrey Akhmeteli
• wave function in QM and QED, kvblake2003
  • Re: wave function in QM and QED, Jon Bell
• log log plot of decay widths, arivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Decoherence - matter wave disentanglement?, zekise
• Questions about atoms, Mike Helland
• boosts on spinors, mahdiarnt
• Re: Solid State Physics Q about ice melting point, Igor Khavkine
• Why do instantons exist in lattice gauge theory?, Max
• Postdoctoral position in Nanotechnology, manuscha
• Attaching conductive cable to orbital object, rhnl
  • Re: Attaching conductive cable to orbital object, Dirk Bruere
  • Re: Attaching conductive cable to orbital object, mr . scate
  • Re: Attaching conductive cable to orbital object, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
  • Re: Attaching conductive cable to orbital object, ianparker2
• Fine-Tuning from First Principles... don't laugh..., island
• Radiation reaction for a uniformly accelerated charge, spardr
  • Re: Radiation reaction for a uniformly accelerated charge, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Radiation reaction for a uniformly accelerated charge, Daryl McCullough
• why eta'(958)?, arivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Life in the Cosmos, rev.goetz
  • Re: Life in the Cosmos, paulaireilly
    • Message not available
      • Re: Life in the Cosmos, island
• rest mass/relativistic mass question, Chalky
  • Re: rest mass/relativistic mass question, Jon Bell
  • Re: rest mass/relativistic mass question, Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
  • Re: rest mass/relativistic mass question, Pmb
    • Re: rest mass/relativistic mass question -- and other adjustments to the FAQ, markwh04
  • Re: rest mass/relativistic mass question, John Bell
  • Re: rest mass/relativistic mass question, Chalky
    • Re: rest mass/relativistic mass question, Blackbird
  • Re: rest mass/relativistic mass question, Chalky
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: rest mass/relativistic mass question, Greg Egan
    • Re: rest mass/relativistic mass question, Chalky
      • Re: rest mass/relativistic mass question, Blackbird
    • Re: rest mass/relativistic mass question, Chalky
  • Re: rest mass/relativistic mass question, Greg Egan
• Derivation of inertial mass = gravitational mass?, melroysoares
  • Re: Derivation of inertial mass = gravitational mass?, p-brane
• Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einsteni's equations, markwh04
  • Inverse-square force law from Raychaudhuri equation (was: [...] from Einsteni's equations), markwh04
• DRAFT paper "Why Local Duality Symmetry May be the Key to Understanding Fermion Generation Replication and Rest Masses", comments appreciated, Jay R. Yablon
• Posted Draft paper on Magnetic Monopoles, comments appreciated, Jay R. Yablon
• Koide awareness, arivero@xxxxxxxxx
• The Kitchen Sink Mystery, Souvik
  • Re: The Kitchen Sink Mystery, arivero@xxxxxxxxx
• 3 time dimensions, Dirk Bruere
  • Re: 3 time dimensions, Max
• Mathematical model of inertia, Mike Helland
  • Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Igor
  • Re: Mathematical model of inertia, jamesahart79
    • Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Mike Helland
  • Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Chris Rohr
  • Re: Mathematical model of inertia, markwh04
• Curvature by Cartan's method?, nicola_ambrosetti
  • Re: Curvature by Cartan's method?, garrett . lisi
  • Re: Curvature by Cartan's method?, Roland Franzius
  • Re: Curvature by Cartan's method?, carlip-nospam
    • Re: Curvature by Cartan's method?, nicola_ambrosetti
  • Re: Curvature by Cartan's method?, markwh04
• relativity question re supernovae, Cyberkatru
  • Re: relativity question re supernovae, Jeremy Henty
  • Re: relativity question re supernovae, ebunn
  • Re: relativity question re supernovae, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
    • Re: relativity question re supernovae, Alf P. Steinbach
      • Re: relativity question re supernovae, ebunn
    • Re: relativity question re supernovae, jamesahart79
• Announcing Cycles Research Insititute Discussion Forum, Ray Tomes
• Space- and time-like showers, kalium@xxxxxx
• Quantum Decoherence - heavy matterwave collision-emission, zekise
• Zero-postulate classical derivation of Planck's law - at the APS Meeting in March, earthshrink
• Why does EPR need two observables?, Vonny N.
  • Re: Why does EPR need two observables?, a student
    • Re: Why does EPR need two observables?, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: Why does EPR need two observables?, a student
      • Re: Why does EPR need two observables?, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: Why does EPR need two observables?, I.Vecchi
  • Re: Why does EPR need two observables?, I.Vecchi
    • Re: Why does EPR need two observables?, Andreas Most
  • Re: Why does EPR need two observables?, Vonny N.
    • Re: Why does EPR need two observables?, Ilja Schmelzer
  • Re: Why does EPR need two observables?, a student
  • Re: Why does EPR need two observables?, I.Vecchi
  • Re: Why does EPR need two observables?, nightlight
• interference experiment with opposite orientations of spin, Nick
  • Re: interference experiment with opposite orientations of spin, gao
  • Re: interference experiment with opposite orientations of spin, BDH
• Introductory book on string theory?, Ralph E. Frost
  • Re: Introductory book on string theory?, Mikael Djurfeldt
    • Re: Introductory book on string theory?, Ralph E. Frost
• Modular Invariance, S.M
  • Re: Modular Invariance, rusty
  • Re: Modular Invariance, S.M
    • Re: Modular Invariance, rusty
    • Re: Modular Invariance, thomas_larsson_01
• Re: Stationary neutrinos, John Baez
• How strong is the evidence for Bell inequality violations?, gralp
• Question about conformal flatness, Charles Francis
• This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226), John Baez
  • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226), tessel
    • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226), John Baez
  • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226), John Baez
    • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226), Stephen Riley
    • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226), jmfbah
  • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226), Squark
    • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 226), Ralph Hartley
• Re: Newton's inverse-square force law from Einstein's equation, Richard Saam
• MME question, Mike Helland
  • Re: MME question, Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
    • Re: MME question, Mike Helland
    • Re: MME question, Cl . Massé
  • Re: MME question, Cl.Massé
• Looking for arXiv endorsement, Mike Helland
• Links to historic pysics papers, Allan Murray
• Re: LQG vs. Minkowsky Spacetime (Was: The string theory dominance), Marissa Kay
• Re: applications leading to a normal eigenvalue problem, ARP
  • Re: applications leading to a normal eigenvalue problem, Arnold Neumaier
• Re: What to make of the supposed observation of a Cosmic String., Igor Khavkine
• Planck length calculated assuming D > 3 dimensions - would it be larger?, teds@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Planck length calculated assuming D > 3 dimensions - would it be larger?, arivero@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Planck length calculated assuming D > 3 dimensions - would it be larger?, FrediFizzx
  • Re: Planck length calculated assuming D > 3 dimensions - would it be larger?, arivero@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Planck length calculated assuming D > 3 dimensions - would it be larger?, Robert Low
• Mass vs distance, Ian Macmillan
  • Re: Mass vs distance, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
    • Re: Mass vs distance, Ian Macmillan
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mass vs distance, Ian Macmillan
    • Re: Mass vs distance, Cl.Massé
    • Re: Mass vs distance, paulaireilly
      • Re: Mass vs distance, Ian Macmillan
    • Re: Mass vs distance, paulaireilly
  • Re: Mass vs distance, paulaireilly
    • Re: Mass vs distance, Ian Macmillan
      • Re: Mass vs distance, paulaireilly
• Radiation's equivalence principle, Lord Snooty
  • Re: Radiation's equivalence principle, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
    • Re: Radiation's equivalence principle, ebunn
      • Re: Radiation's equivalence principle, Tom Roberts
      • [Spam?] Re: Radiation's equivalence principle, ebunn
      • Re: Radiation's equivalence principle, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Radiation's equivalence principle, ebunn
      • Equations of motion for charged particles, spardr
  • Re: Radiation's equivalence principle, Marc Millis
  • Re: Radiation's equivalence principle, ebunn
  • Re: Radiation's equivalence principle, markwh04
• "s" state electrons in Hydrogen, Mike Fontenot
  • Re: "s" state electrons in Hydrogen, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: "s" state electrons in Hydrogen, Mike Fontenot
      • Re: "s" state electrons in Hydrogen, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: "s" state electrons in Hydrogen, Roland Franzius
  • Re: "s" state electrons in Hydrogen, Jon Bell
    • Re: "s" state electrons in Hydrogen, Mike Fontenot
  • Re: "s" state electrons in Hydrogen, Cl.Massé
  • Re: "s" state electrons in Hydrogen, uekstrom
• Is the non-relativistic Lagrangian Galilean invariant?, Max
  • Re: Is the non-relativistic Lagrangian Galilean invariant?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Is the non-relativistic Lagrangian Galilean invariant?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Is the non-relativistic Lagrangian Galilean invariant?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Is the non-relativistic Lagrangian Galilean invariant?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Is the non-relativistic Lagrangian Galilean invariant?, Hendrik van Hees
      • Re: Is the non-relativistic Lagrangian Galilean invariant?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Is the non-relativistic Lagrangian Galilean invariant?, Hendrik van Hees
• "P not equal NP" as a physical principle?, John Baez
  • Re: "P not equal NP" as a physical principle?, Marc Nardmann
  • Re: "P not equal NP" as a physical principle?, Aaron Denney
    • Re: "P not equal NP" as a physical principle?, John Baez
• Is Einstein's general relativity a generalization of the Lorentz symmetry?, Max
• The phase of Psi in a strong gravitational field, ANS
  • Re: The phase of Psi in a strong gravitational field, carlip-nospam
  • Re: The phase of Psi in a strong gravitational field, Igor Khavkine
• Is spin torsion interaction in the Einstein-Cartan theory?, Max
• Atomic orbital structure, Murray Coons
  • Re: Atomic orbital structure, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Atomic orbital structure, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Atomic orbital structure, Igor Khavkine
• Excited states of the hydrogen atom, Mike Fontenot
  • Re: Excited states of the hydrogen atom, ebunn
    • Re: Excited states of the hydrogen atom, Mike Fontenot
  • Re: Excited states of the hydrogen atom, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Excited states of the hydrogen atom, Mike Fontenot
  • Message not available
    • Re: Excited states of the hydrogen atom, Mike Fontenot
      • Re: Excited states of the hydrogen atom, Blackbird
  • Re: Excited states of the hydrogen atom, Igor Khavkine
• Milky Way, Dirk Bruere at Neopax
  • Re: Milky Way, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
  • Re: Milky Way, Stephen Harris
  • Re: Milky Way, Marco Masi
    • Re: Milky Way, island
• algebra of scalar superfields, arivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: gauge transformations: local, global,large and asymptotically non-trivial, andrew . stewart
  • Re: gauge transformations: local, global,large and asymptotically non-trivial, thomas_larsson_01
• Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, tessel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, John Bell
    • Message not available
      • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, tessel
    • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, John Bell
• Is spin torsion interaction in the Einstein-Cartan theory detectable?, Max
• What is the spontaneously broken symmetry group for the liquid-gas phase transition?, Max
  • Re: What is the spontaneously broken symmetry group for the liquid-gas phase transition?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: What is the spontaneously broken symmetry group for the liquid-gas phase transition?, Max
• 2-D CFT and Diff(circle), isol
• Are there more neutrinos than antineutrinos in the universe?, Max
  • Re: Are there more neutrinos than antineutrinos in the universe?, ebunn
  • Re: Are there more neutrinos than antineutrinos in the universe?, Hendrik van Hees
  • Re: Are there more neutrinos than antineutrinos in the universe?, Max
    • Re: Are there more neutrinos than antineutrinos in the universe?, ebunn
• Re: Penrose's new ideas on the big bang, DRLunsford
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Penrose's new ideas on the big bang, Charles Francis
    • Re: Penrose's new ideas on the big bang, Dirk Bruere at Neopax
      • Re: Penrose's new ideas on the big bang, Jakob Rohrhirsch
  • Re: Penrose's new ideas on the big bang, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Penrose's new ideas on the big bang, Charles Francis
    • Re: Penrose's new ideas on the big bang, pete . leigh
  • Re: Penrose's new ideas on the big bang, Charles Francis
  • Re: Penrose's new ideas on the big bang, markwh04
• Re: building statistical thermodynamics from cellular automata, Alex
• Re: gauge transformations: local, global, large and asymptotically non-trivial, thomas_larsson_01
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: gauge transformations: local, global, large and asymptotically non-trivial, Darth Sidious
  • Re: gauge transformations: local, global, large and asymptotically non-trivial, DRLunsford
    • Re: gauge transformations: local, global, large and asymptotically non-trivial, thomas_larsson_01
  • Re: gauge transformations: local, global, large and asymptotically non-trivial, thomas_larsson_01
  • Re: gauge transformations: local, global, large and asymptotically non-trivial, thomas_larsson_01
  • Re: gauge transformations: local, global, large and asymptotically non-trivial, Darth Sidious
• Why is pressure tensor in hydrodynamics purely dissipative?, Max
  • Re: Why is pressure tensor in hydrodynamics purely dissipative?, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Why is pressure tensor in hydrodynamics purely dissipative?, Niels L Ellegaard
  • Re: Why is pressure tensor in hydrodynamics purely dissipative?, Max
  • Re: Why is pressure tensor in hydrodynamics purely dissipative?, Igor Khavkine
• Re: The Heim-Theory Research Group, John Reed
• Re: Is this a common mistake in QM books?.., Roland Franzius
• Re: Fermi's Paradox and Seti, Terry Pilling
• Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Nick Summers
  • Re: Black Hole Puts Dent In Space-time, Norm Dresner
• Re: the quantum hypothesis and blackbody radiation, Igor Khavkine
• What is the helicity of Higgs Bosons?, Max
  • Re: What is the helicity of Higgs Bosons?, Hendrik van Hees
    • Re: What is the helicity of Higgs Bosons?, Max
  • Re: What is the helicity of Higgs Bosons?, Boris Bralo
  • Re: What is the helicity of Higgs Bosons?, jambaugh
    • Re: What is the helicity of Higgs Bosons?, Max
      • Re: What is the helicity of Higgs Bosons?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: What is the helicity of Higgs Bosons?, mgao
  • Re: What is the helicity of Higgs Bosons?, jambaugh
• Falling 6 arm interferometer?, tessel
• Re: commutators and translation operators, boris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: commutators and translation operators, DGoncz
  • Re: commutators and translation operators, DGoncz
  • Re: commutators and translation operators, boris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Looking for a concept, thomas_larsson_01
  • Re: Looking for a concept, Ilja Schmelzer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Looking for a concept, I.Vecchi
  • Re: Looking for a concept, thomas_larsson_01
    • Re: Looking for a concept, Ilja Schmelzer
  • Re: Looking for a concept, thomas_larsson_01
    • Re: Looking for a concept, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: Looking for a concept, thomas_larsson_01
  • Re: Looking for a concept, thomas_larsson_01
  • Re: Looking for a concept, Kwok Man Hui
  • Re: Looking for a concept, Kwok Man Hui
• Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Ralph Hartley
  • Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Ralph Hartley
  • Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Ralph Hartley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Quantum communication might be possible?, Greg Egan
• Re: entangled states, Andreas Most
  • Re: entangled states, Ilja Schmelzer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: entangled states, Hendrik van Hees
    • Re: entangled states, Andreas Most
      • Re: entangled states, Hendrik van Hees
      • Re: entangled states, Andreas Most
  • Re: entangled states, Andreas Most
    • Re: entangled states, Ilja Schmelzer
  • Re: entangled states, I.Vecchi
    • Re: entangled states, Andreas Most
      • Re: entangled states, I.Vecchi
  • Re: entangled states, I.Vecchi
• A Newtonian Argument for Spacetime Curvature, Murat Ozer
  • Re: A Newtonian Argument for Spacetime Curvature, cmaj10
  • Re: A Newtonian Argument for Spacetime Curvature, Blackbird
  • Re: A Newtonian Argument for Spacetime Curvature, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
    • Re: A Newtonian Argument for Spacetime Curvature, Joe Fischer
  • Re: A Newtonian Argument for Spacetime Curvature, Ilja Schmelzer
  • Re: A Newtonian Argument for Spacetime Curvature, RP
• Re: Gyroscope, DGoncz
• Generation of Entangled Photons, diogenes500
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Generation of Entangled Photons, Joe Rongen
• Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, strangerep
    • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
  • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Kit Adams
    • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Kit Adams
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Kit Adams
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
  • Re: Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Hendrik van Hees
    • Re: Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
  • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, strangerep
    • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Hendrik van Hees
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
    • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, strangerep
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
      • Lorentz Invariance Questions in the Standard Model, strangerep
      • Re: Lorentz Invariance Questions in the Standard Model, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Cl . Massé
    • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Cl.Massé
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Cl . Massé
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Cl.Massé
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
  • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Max
    • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Max
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Max
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, strangerep
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
  • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
  • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, strangerep
    • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
  • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, strangerep
    • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
• Is Classical Statistical Mechanics dead?, Vonny N.
  • Re: Is Classical Statistical Mechanics dead?, Douglas Natelson
    • Re: Is Classical Statistical Mechanics dead?, Vonny N.
      • Re: Is Classical Statistical Mechanics dead?, Hendrik van Hees
      • Re: Is Classical Statistical Mechanics dead?, Douglas Natelson
      • Re: Is Classical Statistical Mechanics dead?, Hendrik van Hees
  • Re: Is Classical Statistical Mechanics dead?, ebunn
  • Re: Is Classical Statistical Mechanics dead?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Is Classical Statistical Mechanics dead?, Ilja Schmelzer
  • Re: Is Classical Statistical Mechanics dead?, Lou Pecora
  • Re: Is Classical Statistical Mechanics dead?, Vonny N.
    • Re: Is Classical Statistical Mechanics dead?, Douglas Natelson
      • Re: Is Classical Statistical Mechanics dead?, Vonny N.
  • Re: Is Classical Statistical Mechanics dead?, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Is Classical Statistical Mechanics dead?, Alex
  • Re: Is Classical Statistical Mechanics dead?, acl
  • Re: Is Classical Statistical Mechanics dead?, Alex
  • Re: Is Classical Statistical Mechanics dead?, Marissa Kay
  • Re: Is Classical Statistical Mechanics dead?, DRLunsford
• "On the concept of mass on relativity", Pmb

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(14)