sci.physics.research

• Date Index

• Required power for Si evaporation?, taeri
• U237 in nuclear reactor?, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: U237 in nuclear reactor?, G. R. L. Cowan
• Why is angular Lz quantized in three dimensions but not in two?, km
  • Re: Why is angular Lz quantized in three dimensions but not in two?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Why is angular Lz quantized in three dimensions but not in two?, Igor
  • Re: Why is angular Lz quantized in three dimensions but not in two?, Puppet_Sock
• An electron in a magnetostatic field, Phil Gardner
  • Re: An electron in a magnetostatic field, Igor Khavkine
• Why is the Higgs Boson tachyonic?, Souvik
  • Re: Why is the Higgs Boson tachyonic?, Hendrik van Hees
  • Re: Why is the Higgs Boson tachyonic?, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Why is the Higgs Boson tachyonic?, Souvik
      • Re: Why is the Higgs Boson tachyonic?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Why is the Higgs Boson tachyonic?, Oz
      • Re: Why is the Higgs Boson tachyonic?, Hendrik van Hees
  • Re: Why is the Higgs Boson tachyonic?, Darth Sidious
    • Re: Why is the Higgs Boson tachyonic?, Souvik
• multiple spatial derivitives of psi leads to non-locality, teds@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: multiple spatial derivitives of psi leads to non-locality, Darth Sidious
• quantum analogue of classical mechanics, David Macmanus
  • Re: quantum analogue of classical mechanics, Souvik
  • Re: quantum analogue of classical mechanics, Arnold Neumaier
• modes in semi circular waveguide, Zhen . Guoliang
• Question about the Euler tensor for timelike and spacelike metric signatures, Jay R. Yablon
• Newtonian Physics as a curved spacetime, markwh04
• questions about light, laura
  • Re: questions about light, Hontas Farmer
    • Re: questions about light, laura
    • Re: questions about light, Cl . Massé
  • Re: questions about light, Cl . Massé
    • Re: questions about light, laura
      • Re: questions about light, Cl . Massé
  • Re: questions about light, Blackbird
    • Re: questions about light, laura
      • Re: questions about light, Blackbird
  • Re: questions about light, John Bell
• Any news on the heavier elements?, Starbles
  • Re: Any news on the heavier elements?, Uncle Al
• Does WMAP disprove a time-varying cosmological constant?, frank_k_sheldon
  • Re: Does WMAP disprove a time-varying cosmological constant?, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
    • Re: Does WMAP disprove a time-varying cosmological constant?, ebunn
• The Dirac Equation in Maxwell Form, markwh04
  • Re: The Dirac Equation in Maxwell Form, Hans Aberg
• Podkletnov revisited?, Dirk Bruere
  • Re: Podkletnov revisited?, dmtbgv
    • Re: Podkletnov revisited?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Podkletnov revisited?, John Bell
      • Re: Podkletnov revisited?, Igor Khavkine
• Recommend a book on "Quantum Chaos", Lou Pecora
• On The Quantum Dynamics of Moving Bodies, markwh04
• The Yang-Mills Equations In Maxwell Form, markwh04
• Magnetic monopoles allowed, since GSW. Monopole solution derived., markwh04
• The nucleus., Starbles
  • Re: The nucleus., Uncle Al
    • Re: The nucleus., vivishek
• Particles pairs from the vacuum, frisbieinstein
  • Re: Particles pairs from the vacuum, Uncle Al
  • Re: Particles pairs from the vacuum, strangerep
• Best course routes for studying Cosmology, dogpille
  • Re: Best course routes for studying Cosmology, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Wanted: Physics help needed in / near Norfolk, England, brodders
• Questions on the Kerr metric cont'n, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Questions on the Kerr metric cont'n, Jay R. Yablon
    • Re: Questions on the Kerr metric cont'n, tessel
  • Re: Questions on the Kerr metric cont'n, tessel
• Confining mechanics, janco
• Wigner Classification for Galilei/Poincare/Euclid, markwh04
  • Re: Wigner Classification for Galilei/Poincare/Euclid, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Wigner Classification for Galilei/Poincare/Euclid, John Velman
  • Re: Wigner Classification for Galilei/Poincare/Euclid, Hendrik van Hees
• The Helmholz Conditions For Field Equations, markwh04
• A "Dirac-Like" Derivation of the Dirac-Kemmer Equation, markwh04
• SuperSymmetry and SuperConformal group in 2 dims, S.M
• This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 228), John Baez
  • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 228), Tim S
    • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 228), Tim S
• Energizing spin networks in LQG & Background Independence inq., quant
  • Re: Energizing spin networks in LQG & Background Independence inq., Igor Khavkine
• Re: Solution to Einstein's Field Equations where T^uv not= 0?, Benjamin Schulz
• Gedankenexperiment that just occured to me, fido
  • Re: Gedankenexperiment that just occured to me, Uncle Al
    • Re: Gedankenexperiment that just occured to me, fido
• electrons and Kummer surfaces, georgie
  • Re: electrons and Kummer surfaces, tessel
• Citation indexes for mathematical physics, principalbundles
  • Re: Citation indexes for mathematical physics, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Citation indexes for mathematical physics, tessel
• Angular velocity absolute?, eastmond
  • Re: Angular velocity absolute?, Henning Makholm
• Zeno and modern science, Zurab Silagadze
• Re: Why is pressure tensor in hydrodynamics purely dissipative?, Max
• Radiation reaction and the equivalence principle (again!), ebunn
  • Re: Radiation reaction and the equivalence principle (again!), Uncle Al
  • Re: Radiation reaction and the equivalence principle (again!), cloudswrest
• Observable-Hermitian link, Ali Mansour
  • Re: Observable-Hermitian link, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Observable-Hermitian link, Ali
      • Re: Observable-Hermitian link, Arnold Neumaier
• Different Formalism of Quantum Mechanics, Ali Mansour
  • Re: Different Formalism of Quantum Mechanics, Cl . Massé
  • Re: Different Formalism of Quantum Mechanics, Charles Francis
• This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 227), John Baez
• Electron creation, Phil Gardner
  • Re: Electron creation, Arnold Neumaier
• Help on disturbance in gravitational field during earthquake., AbhiEJeet
  • Re: Help on disturbance in gravitational field during earthquake., Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
  • Re: Help on disturbance in gravitational field during earthquake., carlip-nospam
  • Re: Help on disturbance in gravitational field during earthquake., AbhiEJeet
• Is the quantum field an aether?, ptamirez
  • Re: Is the quantum field an aether?, Timo Nieminen
  • Re: Is the quantum field an aether?, Roman Werpachowski
    • Re: Is the quantum field an aether?, Dirk Bruere
  • Re: Is the quantum field an aether?, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Is the quantum field an aether?, ptamirez
  • Re: Is the quantum field an aether?, DRLunsford
  • Re: Is the quantum field an aether?, markwh04
• Can Branes exist without strings??, quantis
• Nature of molecular orbital., vegan16
• BRST, non-minimal sectors, and involution, thomas_larsson_01
• arxiv structure, trunov
• Re : The Higgs is necessary (was: Higgs found?), markwh04
• Publishing physics without institutional affiliation, Vonny N.
  • Re: Publishing physics without institutional affiliation, FrediFizzx
  • Re: Publishing physics without institutional affiliation, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
  • Re: Publishing physics without institutional affiliation, John Bell
  • Re: Publishing physics without institutional affiliation, John Bell
• Re: Penrose's new ideas on the big bang, markwh04
• Electroweak & "Vacuons" (was: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model), markwh04
• Re: Questions about atoms, paulaireilly
• "Differential Forms in Electromagnetics" by Ismo V. Lindell, Bill J.
• Re: "P not equal NP" as a physical principle?, Arnold Neumaier
• clouds, ESCOBAR
  • Re: clouds, RP
  • Re: clouds, Cl . Massé
  • Re: clouds, Dirk Bruere
  • Re: clouds, I.Vecchi
• Re: The measurement postulate, M.LeBel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The measurement postulate, Mike Helland
• Is Nelson's stochastic quantization equivalent to Schrodinger equation?, Max
  • Re: Is Nelson's stochastic quantization equivalent to Schrodinger equation?, Benjamin Schulz
  • Re: Is Nelson's stochastic quantization equivalent to Schrodinger, Benjamin Schulz
  • Message not available
    • Re: Is Nelson's stochastic quantization equivalent to Schrodinger equation?, Max
  • Re: Is Nelson's stochastic quantization equivalent to Schrodinger equation?, markwh04
• The densities of a subatomic particle, Phil Gardner
  • Re: The densities of a subatomic particle, Cl . Massé
    • Re: The densities of a subatomic particle, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: The densities of a subatomic particle, Cl . Massé
  • Re: The densities of a subatomic particle, Phil Gardner
    • Re: The densities of a subatomic particle, Arnold Neumaier
• List of all-time top cited HEP articles (as of March 07th 2004), arivero@xxxxxxxxx
• localised chaos, abhi
• Physical Constants, Dirk Bruere
  • Re: Physical Constants, Dirk Bruere
  • Re: Physical Constants, robert bristow-johnson
    • Re: Physical Constants, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Physical Constants, Richard Saam
      • Re: Physical Constants, Aetherist
      • Re: Physical Constants, robert bristow-johnson
    • Re: Physical Constants, ebunn
  • Re: Physical Constants, richard miller
  • Re: Physical Constants, Oz
    • Re: Physical Constants, FrediFizzx
• Photons and Mass, Radium
  • Re: Photons and Mass, Dirk Bruere
    • Re: Photons and Mass, robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: Photons and Mass, Alf P. Steinbach
  • Re: Photons and Mass, Patrick Schaaf
  • Re: Photons and Mass, Phil Gardner
  • Re: Photons and Mass, chronon
    • Re: Photons and Mass, island
  • Re: Photons and Mass, strangerep
  • Re: Photons and Mass, chronon
  • Re: Photons and Mass, John Bell
    • Re: Photons and Mass, Aaron Denney
      • Re: Photons and Mass, John Bell
      • Re: Photons and Mass, chronon
      • Re: Photons and Mass, Igor Khavkine
  • Real Objects of Negative Orthodoxy... not mass, island
    • Re: Real Objects of Negative Orthodoxy... not mass, island
• Delta x_st.psi in Maximal Localization State, ariana
• Electron positron annihilation, pej . dgr
  • Re: Electron positron annihilation, arivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Why is Euler equation similar to the gradient of Hamilton-Jacobi equation?, Max
  • Re: Why is Euler equation similar to the gradient of Hamilton-Jacobi equation?, a student
• QED correction terms, mark_horn
• Re: What is a "nuclear flame"?, DGoncz
• Re: Mathematical model of inertia, Mike Helland
• entangled you, superposed me, I.Vecchi
• Re: Why does EPR need two observables?, a student
• How can we tell two actions give the same equations of motion?, Max
• electroweak symmetry unbreaking?, arivero@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: electroweak symmetry unbreaking?, arivero@xxxxxxxxx
• photon electroweak mixing question, Parti
  • Re: photon electroweak mixing question, Stephen Selipsky
    • Re: photon electroweak mixing question, Hendrik van Hees
      • Re: photon electroweak mixing question, Stephen Selipsky
  • Re: photon electroweak mixing question, markwh04
• Re: QM without "photons" or Schr?dinger's wave equation, Arnold Neumaier
• general relativity question, zephir
  • Re: general relativity question, Jon Bell
  • Re: general relativity question, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: general relativity question, David Park
  • Re: general relativity question, Richard Harke
    • Re: general relativity question, Hendrik van Hees
      • Re: general relativity question, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: general relativity question, tessel
      • Re: general relativity question, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: general relativity question, rof
    • Re: general relativity question, tessel
      • Re: general relativity question, rof
  • Re: general relativity question, tessel
  • Re: general relativity question, markwh04
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: general relativity question, Greg Egan
• Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
  • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
  • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
      • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Igor Khavkine
• Re: algebra of Kreimer-Connes renormalization, rusty
• Poincare's theorem on nonintegrable system, dikim012
  • Re: Poincare's theorem on nonintegrable system, Lou Pecora
  • Re: Poincare's theorem on nonintegrable system, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Poincare's theorem on nonintegrable system, tessel
• Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, Igor Khavkine
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, John Bell
  • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, tessel
  • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, John Bell
    • Message not available
      • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, tessel
    • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, John Bell
    • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, John Bell
    • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, Charles Francis
      • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, John Bell
      • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, Charles Francis
• Re: log log plot of decay widths, arivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Mass vs distance, Ian Macmillan
  • Re: Mass vs distance, Joe Fischer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mass vs distance, paulaireilly
    • Re: Mass vs distance, Ian Macmillan
  • Re: Mass vs distance, paulaireilly
• Re: Re: entangled states, Peter
  • Re: Re: entangled states, FrediFizzx
    • Re: entangled states, Roland Franzius
• Re: Re: P. Milonni and his paper, Hendrik van Hees
  • Re: P. Milonni and his paper, Stephen Parrott
• Counterfactual Computation, Daryl McCullough
  • Re: Counterfactual Computation, Dirk Bruere
  • Re: Counterfactual Computation, diemar
  • Re: Counterfactual Computation, timrobinson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Counterfactual Computation, Greg Egan
• Re: P. Milloni and his paper, FrediFizzx
• Re: Life in the Cosmos, Stephen Harris
  • Re: Life in the Cosmos, island
• Re: Is the non-relativistic Lagrangian Galilean invariant?, Max

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint