sci.physics.research

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Fun problem
  • From: Blackbird
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: Ralph Hartley
• Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories)
  • From: Hendrik van Hees
• Re: Question about the De Broglie Wavelength
  • From: Hontas Farmer
• Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories)
  • From: Hendrik van Hees
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: John Bell
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: John Bell
• Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories)
  • From: Hendrik van Hees
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Solution to Einstein's Field Equations where T^uv not= 0?
  • From: vagelford
• Question about the De Broglie Wavelength
  • From: Jenius
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: Ralph Hartley
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: Ralph Hartley
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: gravitomagnetic effect 10^20 large then predicted by GR ?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Gauge fixing question
  • From: Hendrik van Hees
• Re: Deep inelastic scattering
  • From: Cl . Massé
• Question to a detail in derivation of Weinberg's chiral sum rules
  • From: Hendrik van Hees
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: Cl . Massé
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Volume of free-falling dust
  • From: Greg Egan
• Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
  • From: J.C. Yoon
• Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories)
  • From: Oh No
• Cyclohexanone Evaporation Rate
  • From: Delgado, Maria
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: John Bell
• Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories)
  • From: Lou Pecora
• Re: Little's high temp supercon - numbers
  • From: Dirk Bruere
• Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?
  • From: tttito
• Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories)
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Anomalous movement resistance in a spinning gyroscope
  • From: top9
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: John Bell
• Re: Three theories.
  • From: Cl.Massé
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Three theories.
  • From: Thomas Cuny
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces
  • From: 周银兵
• Re: Three theories.
  • From: Blackbird
• Re: Sakurai Advanced QM
  • From: phd15
• Re: Solution to Einstein's Field Equations where T^uv not= 0?
  • From: Jonathan Thornburg
• Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories)
  • From: markwh04
• Gravitomagnetic Induction
  • From: main_engineering
• Gauge fixing question
  • From: Lionel Brits
• Re: Little's high temp supercon - numbers
  • From: Thomas Johnson
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: Joe Warner
• Re: Variant of SR muon experiment
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: bz
• Re: gravitomagnetic effect 10^20 large then predicted by GR ?
  • From: Richard Saam
• Oh my God, the Pioneer Anomaly again?
  • From: J. G. Waller
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: John Bell
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: ruadhan . o . flanagan
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: ruadhan . o . flanagan
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: Boo
• Re: scientia experimentalis
  • From: John Bell
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Variant of SR muon experiment
  • From: Jon Bell
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: John F
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: Cl.Massé
• Re: Solutions to Wald's General Relativity problems
  • From: tessel
• Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories)
  • From: google03
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?
  • From: Oz
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: J. G. Waller
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: John Bell
• Three theories.
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories)
  • From: Hendrik van Hees
• Re: gravitomagnetic effect 10^20 large then predicted by GR ?
  • From: Dirk Bruere
• Re: Classical and Quantum Doppler Shifted Energies.
  • From: John Bell
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Little's high temp supercon - numbers
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: The summaries you suggested I prepare
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: gravitomagnetic effect 10^20 large then predicted by GR ?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: gravitomagnetic effect 10^20 large then predicted by GR ?
  • From: main_engineering
• Re: Sakurai Advanced QM
  • From: Todd
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Birkhoff's theory of gravitation
  • From: Homo Lykos
• Variant of SR muon experiment
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: mahdiarnt
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: Roland Franzius
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: tttito
• Re: Classical and Quantum Doppler Shifted Energies.
  • From: Squark
• Re: The summaries you suggested I prepare
  • From: sr
• Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?
  • From: John Bell
• Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories)
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Fun problem
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Fun problem
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Classical and Quantum Doppler Shifted Energies.
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
  • From: J.C. Yoon
• Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories)
  • From: Hendrik van Hees
• Deep inelastic scattering
  • From: Kasper Jens Larsen
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: bz
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?
  • From: Oh No
• Looking for Best References with "Off-the-Shelf" Exact Solutions to Einstein's Field Equations for Charged Perfect Fluids
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Volume of free-falling dust
  • From: Greg Egan
• Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories)
  • From: Fizyk
• Classical and Quantum Doppler Shifted Energies.
  • From: John Bell
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Oz
• Re: The summaries you suggested I prepare
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Little's high temp supercon - numbers
  • From: sr
• Re: Neutrino mass
  • From: sr
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: bz
• Re: Little's high temp supercon - numbers
  • From: Douglas Natelson
• Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories)
  • From: J. Horta
• Can information travel faster than light?
  • From: Jan Brady
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: John Bell
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: John Bell
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Oz
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?
  • From: Oz
• Re: gravitomagnetic effect 10^20 large then predicted by GR ?
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories)
  • From: thomas_larsson_01
• Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?
  • From: tttito
• Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories)
  • From: John Bell
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: John Bell
• Re: Neutrino mass
  • From: Jon Bell
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: rof
• Solutions to Wald's General Relativity problems
  • From: Vonny N.
• Re: Birkhoff's theory of gravitation
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: John Bell
• Re: The predictions of QED
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: John Bell
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: The predictions of QED
  • From: sr
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: John Bell
• Re: Sakurai Advanced QM
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories)
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Neutrino mass
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Little's high temp supercon - numbers
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories)
  • From: Eckard Blumschein
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: John Bell
• Sakurai Advanced QM
  • From: phd15
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Anomalous movement resistance in a spinning gyroscope
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• scientia experimentalis
  • From: tttito
• RE: The predictions of QED
  • From: andrew . stewart
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Oz
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories)
  • From: J. Horta
• Re: Neutrino mass
  • From: sr
• Re: gravitomagnetic effect 10^20 large then predicted by GR ?
  • From: main_engineering
• Re: gravitomagnetic effect 10^20 large then predicted by GR ?
  • From: main_engineering
• Re: What would a modification do?
  • From: Thomas Cuny
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Oz
• Re: Video Footage Of Antigravity ?
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Non-commuting transformations in quantum mechanics
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Oz
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: rof
• Re: What would a modification do?
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: John Bell
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?
  • From: John Bell
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: rof
• Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories)
  • From: a student
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?
  • From: rof
• Re: What is this theory?
  • From: Starbles
• Re: The predictions of QED
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: What would a modification do?
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Anomalous movement resistance in a spinning gyroscope
  • From: Dirk Bruere
• Re: Yang-Mills and mass gap
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Does EPR require entanglement?
  • From: a student
• Re: gravitomagnetic effect 10^20 large then predicted by GR ?
  • From: Dirk Bruere
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: bz
• Re: Neutrino mass
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Birkhoff's theory of gravitation
  • From: Homo Lykos
• Re: Tacitly presupposed limitation contradicts to expected symmetry
  • From: Eckard Blumschein
• Re: Does EPR require entanglement?
  • From: Cl . Massé
• Expert needed - McGraw-Hill professional technical book author/contributor
  • From: lweauthors
• Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories)
  • From: Brit
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: gravitomagnetic effect 10^20 large then predicted by GR ?
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: The summaries you suggested I prepare
  • From: Hendrik van Hees
• Re: Does EPR require entanglement?
  • From: Oh No
• Re: What would a modification do?
  • From: Oh No
• Re: What would a modification do?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Does EPR require entanglement?
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Neutrino mass
  • From: Alan
• Re: Yang-Mills and mass gap
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: gravitomagnetic effect 10^20 large then predicted by GR ?
  • From: main_engineering
• Re: Birkhoff's theory of gravitation
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
  • From: J.C. Yoon
• Re: Student research - where to publish?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Oh No
• What would a modification do?
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Oz
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Oz
• Re: R = 0
  • From: mihai cartoaje
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?
  • From: ruadhan . o . flanagan
• Non-commuting transformations in quantum mechanics
  • From: Vonny N.
• Re: What is this theory?
  • From: M.LeBel
• Re: Student research - where to publish?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Does EPR require entanglement?
  • From: Cl . Massé
• Re: Student research - where to publish?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: The summaries you suggested I prepare
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: The summaries you suggested I prepare
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Are either GR or QFT more fundamental than the other?
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Joris van Hoboken's thesis on Platonic solids, Kleinian singularities and ADE
  • From: johndevers
• Re: Anomalous movement resistance in a spinning gyroscope
  • From: top9
• Re: The cathedral and the bazaar in physics
  • From: Cl.Massé
• Sokolov's effect - is there any reasonable explanation?
  • From: seve
• Student research - where to publish?
  • From: M
• Re: The predictions of QED
  • From: strangerep
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: tttito
• Re: Neutrino mass
  • From: Neil
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: Oz
• Re: Anomalous movement resistance in a spinning gyroscope
  • From: top9
• Re: Joris van Hoboken's thesis on Platonic solids, Kleinian singularities and ADE
  • From: garrett . lisi
• EM wave Phase change by reflection
  • From: kvblake2003
• Re: Joris van Hoboken's thesis on Platonic solids, Kleinian singularities and ADE
  • From: galathaea
• Re: The predictions of QED
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Joris van Hoboken's thesis on Platonic solids, Kleinian singularities and ADE
  • From: John Baez
• Re: Centre of Mass Theorem for a rotating body
  • From: Mike Freeman
• Re: Joris van Hoboken's thesis on Platonic solids, Kleinian singularities and ADE
  • From: Zurab Silagadze
• Re: The summaries you suggested I prepare
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Are either GR or QFT more fundamental than the other?
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Methods of measuring G.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Centre of Mass Theorem for a rotating body
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: The predictions of QED
  • From: Oh No
• improving standards at arxiv
  • From: Oh No
• Re: gravitomagnetic effect 10^20 large then predicted by GR ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: rof
• Re: The predictions of QED
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: gravitomagnetic effect 10^20 large then predicted by GR ?
  • From: main_engineering
• Re: Does EPR require entanglement?
  • From: Vonny N.
• question about IO, a moon of jupiter. EASY Q (just not for me)
  • From: trey1967a
• Yang-Mills and mass gap
  • From: Marc Reynaud
• Re: Does EPR require entanglement?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Does EPR require entanglement?
  • From: Cl . Massé
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: tttito
• Re: Joris van Hoboken's thesis on Platonic solids, Kleinian singularities and ADE
  • From: J. G. Waller
• Re: Methods of measuring G.
  • From: Oz
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: ruadhan . o . flanagan
• Re: The predictions of QED
  • From: strangerep
• Re: Methods of measuring G.
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Birkhoff's theory of gravitation
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Methods of measuring G.
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Methods of measuring G.
  • From: dvanbaak
• Re: The summaries you suggested I prepare
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Joris van Hoboken's thesis on Platonic solids, Kleinian singularities and ADE
  • From: John Baez
• Re: Methods of measuring G.
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Methods of measuring G.
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
  • From: J.C. Yoon
• Re: What is this theory?
  • From: Starbles
• building a "hybrid" and dynamic mathematical space
  • From: Alvaro . Castro . Castilla
• Experimenting with measurement in quantum mechanics
  • From: jamievicary
• The predictions of QED
  • From: Phil Gardner
• Re: Are either GR or QFT more fundamental than the other?
  • From: Oh No
• Does EPR require entanglement?
  • From: Vonny N.
• Re: What is this theory?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Methods of measuring G.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Anomalous movement resistance in a spinning gyroscope
  • From: Dirk Bruere
• Re: Are either GR or QFT more fundamental than the other?
  • From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• Re: What is this theory?
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: The summaries you suggested I prepare
  • From: strangerep
• Re: Methods of measuring G.
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Methods of measuring G.
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Centre of Mass Theorem for a rotating body
  • From: Jason Stanidge
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?
  • From: Liberty Bell
• What is this theory?
  • From: Starbles
• Re: The summaries you suggested I prepare
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
  • From: tttito
• Methods of measuring G.
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Anomalous movement resistance in a spinning gyroscope
  • From: top9
• Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
  • From: J.C. Yoon
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Q: Disappearing photons?
  • From: Starbles
• Are either GR or QFT more fundamental than the other?
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Birkhoff's theory of gravitation
  • From: Dirk Bruere
• The summaries you suggested I prepare
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Dr. Parrott's Objection is Persuasive
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: The Bicycle Eikonal
  • From: Doug Goncz
• The Bicycle Eikonal
  • From: Doug Goncz
• Path integral formulation of wave-optics
  • From: Jagmeet Singh
• J. Yablon's lastest "draft paper"
  • From: spardr
• Q: Disappearing photons?
  • From: Joe Rongen
• Re: Quantization of non-Cartesian coordinates
  • From: mahdiarnt
• Re: R = 0
  • From: Tobias Fritz
• Re: R = 0
  • From: Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
• Re: Anomalous movement resistance in a spinning gyroscope
  • From: Dirk Bruere
• Re: R = 0
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: general relativity question
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Particles pairs from the vacuum
  • From: strangerep
• The cathedral and the bazaar in physics
  • From: Co Georg
• Re: Tacitly presupposed limitation contradicts to expected symmetry
  • From: Eckard Blumschein
• Path integral formulation of wave-optics
  • From: Jagmeet Singh
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?
  • From: tttito
• Re: R = 0
  • From: tessel
• Re: R = 0
  • From: Tobias Fritz
• Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
  • From: J.C. Yoon
• Re: Birkhoff's theory of gravitation
  • From: Homo Lykos
• Re: Measurement Issues: POVM, Neumann and generalized
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Anomalous movement resistance in a spinning gyroscope
  • From: realist
• Re: Neutrino mass
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Measurement Issues: POVM, Neumann and generalized
  • From: Vonny N.
• Re: Anomalous movement resistance in a spinning gyroscope
  • From: Dirk Bruere
• Re: Why is the Higgs Boson tachyonic?
  • From: arivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Draft paper deriving a non-empty, stationary, axisymmetric solution solution of Einstein's Equations, based on the Lorentz Force Law
  • From: tessel
• Nature of Space and Time on DVD
  • From: nekoogar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Video Footage Of Antigravity ?
  • From: Marc Millis
• Re: Birkhoff's theory of gravitation
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Differing views on quantum gravity.
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Quantization of non-Cartesian coordinates
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Birkhoff's theory of gravitation
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Measurement Issues: POVM, Neumann and generalized
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Neutrino mass
  • From: Jon Bell
• Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Draft paper deriving a non-empty, stationary, axisymmetric solution solution of Einstein's Equations, based on the Lorentz Force Law
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Differing views on quantum gravity.
  • From: Starbles
• R = 0
  • From: mcartoaje
• Re: Birkhoff's theory of gravitation
  • From: tessel
• Measurement Issues: POVM, Neumann and generalized
  • From: km
• Re: Neutrino mass
  • From: Alan
• Re: Birkhoff's theory of gravitation
  • From: Daryl McCullough
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?
  • From: rof
• Seebeck effect and hot-probe test
  • From: Osiris
• Re: Birkhoff's theory of gravitation
  • From: brian a m stuckless
• Draft paper deriving a non-empty, stationary, axisymmetric solution solution of Einstein's Equations, based on the Lorentz Force Law
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Birkhoff's theory of gravitation
  • From: tessel
• Re: general relativity question
  • From: tessel
• Re: Wigner Classification for Galilei/Poincare/Euclid
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: questions about light
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Quantization of non-Cartesian coordinates
  • From: a student
• Video Footage Of Antigravity ?
  • From: fufko
• Anomalous movement resistance in a spinning gyroscope
  • From: top9
• Re: Birkhoff's theory of gravitation
  • From: cmaj10
• What is the real space geometrical interpretation of SU(3)?
  • From: Max
• Re: Birkhoff's theory of gravitation
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Neutrino mass
  • From: Norm Dresner
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?
  • From: Oz
• Quantization of non-Cartesian coordinates
  • From: mahdiarnt
• Re: Differing views on quantum gravity.
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
  • From: J.C. Yoon
• Re: Neutrino mass
  • From: Jon Bell
• Re: Why is pressure tensor in hydrodynamics purely dissipative?
  • From: Max
• Tacitly presupposed limitation contradicts to expected symmetry
  • From: Eckard Blumschein
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Birkhoff's theory of gravitation
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Why is pressure tensor in hydrodynamics purely dissipative?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?
  • From: John Bell
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
  • From: J.C. Yoon
• Re: modes in semi circular waveguide
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Differing views on quantum gravity.
  • From: Starbles
• Neutrino mass
  • From: Alan
• Re: Birkhoff's theory of gravitation
  • From: tessel
• Birkhoff's theory of gravitation
  • From: cmaj10
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?
  • From: John Bell
• Re: The densities of a subatomic particle
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Required power for Si evaporation?
  • From: taeri
• Re: Why is angular Lz quantized in three dimensions but not in two?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Required power for Si evaporation?
  • From: taeri
• Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Earth as an energy source & sink
  • From: dsky
• Re: quantum analogue of classical mechanics
  • From: markwh04
• Re: The densities of a subatomic particle
  • From: Phil Gardner
• Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
  • From: J.C. Yoon
• Re: Wigner Classification for Galilei/Poincare/Euclid
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Why is the Higgs Boson tachyonic?
  • From: Souvik
• Re: questions about light
  • From: Hontas Farmer
• Re: Required power for Si evaporation?
  • From: Joe Warner
• Re: Why is angular Lz quantized in three dimensions but not in two?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Required power for Si evaporation?
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: Solution to Einstein's Field Equations where T^uv not= 0?
  • From: Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
• Re: questions about light
  • From: John Bell
• Re: Why is angular Lz quantized in three dimensions but not in two?
  • From: Hendrik van Hees
• Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model
  • From: Hendrik van Hees

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(10)