Re: Does EPR require entanglement?
- From: Cl.Massé <postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 19:41:04 +0000 (UTC)
<Starbles@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
1145251887.777508.99750@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Just a question or two.
I guess, two ;^)
1. If two entangled particles were to be joined together somehow, what
would the likelyness of their rejoining be?
Nothing particular.
2. Is it possible to coerce entangled particles to do what we want them
to do without disrupting their entanglement? I know measuring them
would un-entangle them, but what if we don't measure them?
Anything else than a measurement won't project the state onto an unentangled
state, the entanglement will then always remain.
Measurement: h1x-h1 + h2x-h2 -> h2x-h2, unentangled.
Otherwise: Uh1x-Vh1 + Uh2x-Vh2 -> (UxV)(h1x-h1 + h2x-h2), unchanged.
--
~~~~ clmasse on free F-country
Liberty, Equality, Profitability.
.
- References:
- Does EPR require entanglement?
- From: Vonny N.
- Re: Does EPR require entanglement?
- From: Starbles
- Does EPR require entanglement?
- Prev by Date: Expert needed - McGraw-Hill professional technical book author/contributor
- Next by Date: Re: Tacitly presupposed limitation contradicts to expected symmetry
- Previous by thread: Re: Does EPR require entanglement?
- Next by thread: Re: Does EPR require entanglement?
- Index(es):