Re: Anomalous movement resistance in a spinning gyroscope
- From: Douglas Eagleson <eaglesondouglas@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:46:53 +0000 (UTC)
top9@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
http://www.oswirus.krakow.pl/cat_14/gyroscope/
A symmetric harnessed gyroscope accelerated to a given spinning
frequency takes different time periods to stop, depending on the
direction of previous spins. For repeated alternating, anticlockwise
and clockwise spinning, the rotation period in both directions
significantly increases, which is not the case when the gyroscope is
repeatedly rotated in the same direction. Using the measurements it was
observed, that the time of gyroscope's rotation was significantly
lengthened or shortened, what indicates that it either increased or
decreased the movement resistance of the gyroscope. The presented
experimental results suggest the existence of anomalous movement
resistance and demonstrate that a fixed spinning gyroscope displays
unusual history-dependent movement resistance effects. The effect is
real, large, reproducible and does not follow from experimental errors.
The manuscript was reviewed thrice, according to the publishing
procedure in "Physical Review Letters" within two year. The remarks of
all the reviewers were taken into account during its correction.
Because the publishing procedure for our manuscript in "Physical Review
Letters" finished, we decided to publish it in Journal of Technical
Physics, J.Tech. Phys., 46, 2, 107-115, 2005.
Well, the effect to be demonstrated is well documented. A
directionality exists.
A telescope of the kind envisioned by the LIGOS team is the tele-gyro.
A difference in location with respect to that which is viewed.
And so the question then becomes what causes the force to appear.
We have had fifty years of anomaly reporting and the theorist has
already ascribed the cause.
And to give the simple version, all spin in relation to the difference
of well, appears
as the precession purterbed.
It is a true gravity related force but is independent. So name that
force is to be the arguement. And if the scientist refuses to identify
the force then theory marchs on and eclipses them.
A quanta of this force is the goal. And the correct density of momenta
to direct the quanta is always beyond the nuclear density. It is a nice
calm region in the force differential field and the outcome in reality
is the technology afforded by the use of self synchronizing media. Spun
liquids will order because of this force's existence.
So the spun weather shows this force effect also, and it is to be just
another wonder except to self symchronize in relation to the earth is
the everpresent science to be given name.
So I get to name it here maybe: geolithing
A word to convey the geometric relation of the directed graph.
Douglas Eagleson
Gaithersburg, MD USA
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?
- Next by Date: Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?
- Previous by thread: Re: Anomalous movement resistance in a spinning gyroscope
- Next by thread: Video Footage Of Antigravity ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
