Gauge fixing question
- From: Lionel Brits <lionel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 21:19:32 +0000 (UTC)
Apologies for the cross posting but this seems to be the place to put it...
I have a question on gauge fixing and path integral evaluation. I hope
it can be answered here. Starting with say, the Maxwell action, we can
write the generating functional as
Z ~ int DA delta[ G[A] ] det M exp{ -i S }
where G[A] = 0 is our gauge condition, and det M is the Faddeev-Popov
determinant. The delta functional can be massaged into the exponential,
giving a term -1/2alpha G[A]2 in the action, which is the "gauge fixing
term".
My question is that initially we enforce G[A] = 0 using the delta
function, but once this gets turned into a "gauge fixing term", it seems
that A no longer needs to satisfy this, and classically the EOMs are not
the maxwell equations. I realize that any physical quantities don't
depend on this, but I don't see where the magic happened. Why doesn't
the gauge fixing term "fix" the gauge?
Thanks to anyone who can clarify.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gauge fixing question
- From: Hendrik van Hees
- Re: Gauge fixing question
- Prev by Date: Re: Little's high temp supercon - numbers
- Next by Date: Gravitomagnetic Induction
- Previous by thread: Oh my God, the Pioneer Anomaly again?
- Next by thread: Re: Gauge fixing question
- Index(es):