sci.physics.research

• Date Index

---

• left-commutative operations, bo198214
• Is_Schrödinger's_Cat_Object-Oriented?, Juan R.
• Far West entangled duellists, Just G. Waller
• Special Relativity in Refractive Media, John Bell
• kinematic relations, Zak
• Elementary Bohm Question, michaeld
• Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 232), Aaron Bergman
  • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 232), John Baez
• Neptune anomaly, I.Vecchi
  • Re: Neptune anomaly, Spud
  • Re: Neptune anomaly, ralph
• Learning Constructive Quantum Field Theory, Martin Chang
• No Boundary Proposal --- Many Worlds?, michael
  • Re: No Boundary Proposal --- Many Worlds?, carlip-nospam
• The Janet Periodic Table of Elements, chemguy
• Why is push gravity concept considered not viable by mainstream science?, Blaze Labs
  • Re: Why is push gravity concept considered not viable by mainstream science?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Why is push gravity concept considered not viable by mainstream, Timo A. Nieminen
  • Re: Why is push gravity concept considered not viable by mainstream science?, carlip-nospam
    • Re: Why is push gravity concept considered not viable by mainstream science?, Richard Saam
      • Re: Why is push gravity concept considered not viable by mainstream science?, carlip-nospam
      • Re: Why is push gravity concept considered not viable by mainstream science?, Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
    • Re: Why is push gravity concept considered not viable by mainstream science?, Sid Lanier
• Re: Why is the Higgs Boson tachyonic?, John Baez
• Re: Podkletnov revisited?, John Baez
• GR and piezoelectricity?, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: GR and piezoelectricity?, Igor Khavkine
• This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 233), John Baez
  • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 233), John Eristu
    • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 233), John Baez
  • Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 233), Daniel Moskovich
• Unifield Field, Ken Stahl
  • Re: Unifield Field, Oh No
  • Re: Unifield Field, Igor
    • Re: Unifield Field, Ken Stahl
  • Re: Unifield Field, Igor
• Minimal Models/Conformal Field Theory question, S.M
• Re: Question about the Euler tensor for timelike and spacelike metric signatures, John Baez
  • Re: Question about the Euler tensor for timelike and spacelike metric, Daryl McCullough
    • Re: Question about the Euler tensor for timelike and spacelike metric, Aaron Bergman
  • Re: Question about the Euler tensor for timelike and spacelike metric signatures, Jay R. Yablon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Question about the Euler tensor for timelike and spacelike metric signatures, Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Cosmic acceleration (from back-reaction), John Bell
  • Re: Cosmic acceleration (from back-reaction), Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
    • Re: Cosmic acceleration (from back-reaction), John Bell
      • Re: Cosmic acceleration (from back-reaction), Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Cosmic acceleration (from back-reaction), Oh No
• Fermions as gauge fields, markwh04
  • Re: Fermions as gauge fields, Cl . Massé
• Re: A note on "Quark Soup", Cl.Massé
• Landscape, S.M
  • Re: Landscape, Kris Kennaway
• Test problems in mechanics and special relativity, Zurab Silagadze
• question about solid and stranded conductors, solid leg wires on detonators?, chemstu
• What is space-time in LQG, J. Horta
  • Re: What is space-time in LQG, Oh No
  • Re: What is space-time in LQG, Igor Khavkine
• My little tribute to Irving Segal: Simultaneity breaks down, Just G. Waller
• Nationwide Physics and Chemistry Sample Test, Chad J
• New Approach to renormalization...., josegarc
• Divergent Approaches to Quantum Gravity (Was: Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?), John Bell
• A question concerning the semi-classical approximation., Matheux
  • Re: A question concerning the semi-classical approximation., Pindare
• Property of photon, rAgAv
  • Re: Property of photon, Sean Case
  • Re: Property of photon, Arkadiusz Jadczyk
  • Re: Property of photon, Stolen_Humanity
  • Re: Property of photon, Uncle Al
  • Re: Property of photon, rAgAv
    • Re: Property of photon, Norm Dresner
    • Re: Property of photon, Jon Bell
  • Re: Property of photon, Oh No
  • Re: Property of photon, Igor
  • Re: Property of photon, rAgAv
    • Re: Property of photon, Filipi Nascimento
    • Re: Property of photon, Igor
  • Re: Property of photon, John Bell
    • Re: Property of photon, Henning Makholm
    • Re: Property of photon, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Property of photon, rAgAv
      • Re: Property of photon, John (Liberty) Bell
  • Re: Property of photon, John Bell
  • Re: Property of photon, John Bell
  • Re: Property of photon, John Bell
• Re: Anomalous movement resistance in a spinning gyroscope, realist
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Anomalous movement resistance in a spinning gyroscope, Douglas Eagleson
• Interaction of the photon, Alec
  • Re: Interaction of the photon, Uncle Al
• Too big for the universe, DarkProtoman
  • Re: Too big for the universe, Oh No
  • Re: Too big for the universe, paul . valletta
  • Re: Too big for the universe, Henning Makholm
  • Re: Too big for the universe, Uncle Al
• Quantum States as Non-Negative Phase Space Probability Distributions, markwh04
  • Re: Quantum States as Non-Negative Phase Space Probability Distributions, p . kinsler
  • Re: Quantum States as Non-Negative Phase Space Probability Distributions, markwh04
    • Re: Quantum States as Non-Negative Phase Space Probability Distributions, p . kinsler
  • Re: Quantum States as Non-Negative Phase Space Probability Distributions, nobody
• QG correspondence between mass and information?, rob langley
• what is energy and what is mass, Roland
  • Re: what is energy and what is mass, Amir
  • Re: what is energy and what is mass, Cl.Massé
  • Re: what is energy and what is mass, rloldershaw@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: what is energy and what is mass, Cl . Massé
  • Re: what is energy and what is mass, Dirk Bruere
  • Re: what is energy and what is mass, rloldershaw@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Inefficiency of secret research?, isaackoi2
  • Re: Inefficiency of secret research?, p . kinsler
  • Re: Inefficiency of secret research?, Marc Millis
  • Re: Inefficiency of secret research?, Sid Lanier
    • Re: Inefficiency of secret research?, p . kinsler
  • Re: Inefficiency of secret research?, Ian Taylor
  • Re: Inefficiency of secret research?, John Bell
  • Re: Inefficiency of secret research?, isaackoi2
• Divergent Approaches to Quantum Gravity. (Was: Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?), John Bell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Divergent Approaches to Quantum Gravity. (Was: Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?), Oh No
  • Re: Divergent Approaches to Quantum Gravity. (Was: Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?), John Bell
  • Re: Divergent Approaches to Quantum Gravity. (Was: Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?), Oh No
  • Re: Divergent Approaches to Quantum Gravity. (Was: Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?), John Bell
• EP violation as theoretical basis for MoND/TeVeS, rob langley
• Spacelike particle propogation, jamievicary
  • Re: Spacelike particle propogation, Oh No
  • Re: Spacelike particle propogation, Eugene Stefanovich
• Triboelectric amplifier, Ian Macmillan
  • Re: Triboelectric amplifier, Ian Macmillan
    • Re: Triboelectric amplifier, Ian Macmillan
• solution of hydrogen atom using Schrodinger's equation, jumanicus
  • Re: solution of hydrogen atom using Schrodinger's equation, Chris H. Fleming
  • Re: solution of hydrogen atom using Schrodinger's equation, Jamie
  • Re: solution of hydrogen atom using Schrodinger's equation, markwh04
    • Re: solution of hydrogen atom using Schrodinger's equation, markwh04
  • Re: solution of hydrogen atom using Schrodinger's equation, paulaireilly
  • Re: solution of hydrogen atom using Schrodinger's equation, Boo
  • Re: solution of hydrogen atom using Schrodinger's equation, Cl . Massé
  • Re: solution of hydrogen atom using Schrodinger's equation, Arkadiusz Jadczyk
  • Re: solution of hydrogen atom using Schrodinger's equation, Cl.Massé
  • Re: solution of hydrogen atom using Schrodinger's equation, David M. Palmer
  • Re: solution of hydrogen atom using Schrodinger's equation, paulaireilly
• Rovelli on EPR, tttito
  • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Oh No
    • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Cl.Massé
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, rof
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, rof
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, rof
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, rof
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Cl . Massé
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, scerir
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Cl . Massé
    • Re: Rovelli on EPR, tttito
  • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Cl.Massé
  • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Oh No
    • Re: Rovelli on EPR, J. Horta
    • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Arkadiusz Jadczyk
    • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Oh No
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Cl.Massé
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Cl . Massé
    • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Cl.Massé
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Oh No
  • Re: Rovelli on EPR, sigoldberg1
    • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Ilja Schmelzer
  • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Oh No
  • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Oh No
  • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Oh No
  • Rovelli (& me) on Axiomatizing Classical & Quantum Theory (was: Rovelli on EPR), markwh04
    • Re: Rovelli (& me) on Axiomatizing Classical & Quantum Theory (was: Rovelli on EPR), Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Rovelli on EPR, tttito
    • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Cl . Massé
  • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Oh No
    • Re: Rovelli on EPR, rof
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, John F
    • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Cl . Massé
  • Re: Rovelli on EPR, tttito
    • Re: Rovelli on EPR, scerir
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, tttito
    • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Cl . Massé
  • Re: Rovelli on EPR, John Bell
    • Re: Rovelli on EPR, rof
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, rof
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, rof
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Oh No
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Oh No
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Cl.Massé
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, J. Horta
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Eugene Stefanovich
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Dirk Bruere
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, J. Horta
      • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Blackbird
  • Re: Rovelli on EPR, sigoldberg1
    • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Ilja Schmelzer
  • On observers (was: Rovelli on EPR), thomas_larsson_01
    • Re: On observers (was: Rovelli on EPR), Eugene Stefanovich
  • Re: Rovelli on EPR, John Bell
  • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Oh No
  • Re: Rovelli on EPR, Oh No
  • Re: Rovelli on EPR, John Bell
• two photon annihilation, phd15
  • Re: two photon annihilation, Cl.Massé
• Radiative energy balance of particles in a magnetic field, diogenes500
• Atmospheric plasma, containment and fusion, isaackoi2
  • Re: Atmospheric plasma, containment and fusion, grisly
  • Re: Atmospheric plasma, containment and fusion, Cl . Massé
• building of atoms from ions + electrons, ilper
  • Re: building of atoms from ions + electrons, ilper
• Thermodynamic equlibrium of radiating systems, jumanicus
  • Re: Thermodynamic equlibrium of radiating systems, Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
  • Re: Thermodynamic equlibrium of radiating systems, Brian Elmegaard
  • Re: Thermodynamic equlibrium of radiating systems, Squark
  • Re: Thermodynamic equlibrium of radiating systems, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Thermodynamic equlibrium of radiating systems, Blackbird
• arxiv structure, trunov
  • Re: arxiv structure, barry_adams
• On the Structure of Particles and the Nature of Nuclear Forces, 周银兵
• The Loop & Path Representation of Gauge & String Theories (was: Differing views on quantum gravity.), markwh04
• [Newbie question] Quantum gravity in fractal spacetimes?, C. Tellermann
  • Re: [Newbie question] Quantum gravity in fractal spacetimes?, Oh No
  • Re: [Newbie question] Quantum gravity in fractal spacetimes?, carlip-nospam
• Mechanics: problem of falling stick by I. E. Irodov, boson boss
  • Re: Mechanics: problem of falling stick by I. E. Irodov, Stephen Riley
  • Re: Mechanics: problem of falling stick by I. E. Irodov, jumanicus
  • Re: Mechanics: problem of falling stick by I. E. Irodov, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Mechanics: problem of falling stick by I. E. Irodov, Stephen Riley
  • Re: Mechanics: problem of falling stick by I. E. Irodov, Fredrik Bulow
  • Re: Mechanics: problem of falling stick by I. E. Irodov, Fredrik Bulow
  • Re: Mechanics: problem of falling stick by I. E. Irodov, Oh No
  • Re: Mechanics: problem of falling stick by I. E. Irodov, boson boss
• Chemical Reaction Rate Formula, Squark
  • Re: Chemical Reaction Rate Formula, Richard Saam
  • Re: Chemical Reaction Rate Formula, Calvin D. Ritchie
  • Re: Chemical Reaction Rate Formula, Souvik
  • Re: Chemical Reaction Rate Formula, Uncle Al
  • Re: Chemical Reaction Rate Formula, Squark
    • Re: Chemical Reaction Rate Formula, Calvin D. Ritchie
  • Re: Chemical Reaction Rate Formula, Squark
    • Re: Chemical Reaction Rate Formula, Calvin D. Ritchie
      • Re: Chemical Reaction Rate Formula, Squark
      • Message not available
      • Re: Chemical Reaction Rate Formula, Squark
      • Re: Chemical Reaction Rate Formula, Calvin D. Ritchie
      • Re: Chemical Reaction Rate Formula, Richard Saam
      • Re: Chemical Reaction Rate Formula, Calvin D. Ritchie
    • Re: Chemical Reaction Rate Formula, Squark
• Re: Can information travel faster than light?, Alex
  • Re: Can information travel faster than light?, tttito
    • Re: Can information travel faster than light?, Alex
• Wave-particle duality in quantum optics, spardr
  • Re: Wave-particle duality in quantum optics, kweic
• kinematics, phd15
  • Re: kinematics, Arnie
• Shunts and dividers, Doug Goncz
• Re: Cyclohexanone Evaporation Rate, Doug Goncz
• kinematical relations, phd15
• Re: Question to a detail in derivation of Weinberg's chiral sum rules, Eckard Blumschein
• behaviour of spin, ilper
  • Re: behaviour of spin, Arkadiusz Jadczyk
    • Re: behaviour of spin, ilper
      • Re: behaviour of spin, Arkadiusz Jadczyk
  • Re: behaviour of spin, ilper
• (New?) Energy Parameter, Doug Goncz
  • Re: (New?) Energy Parameter, Doug Goncz
• Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
  • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Lorentz violation of the Standard Model, J.C. Yoon
• Can twisted light be used to detect gravity waves?, johndevers
  • Re: Can twisted light be used to detect gravity waves?, Doug Goncz
  • Re: Can twisted light be used to detect gravity waves?, paul . valletta
  • Re: Can twisted light be used to detect gravity waves?, johndevers
  • Re: Can twisted light be used to detect gravity waves?, paul . valletta
• Re : Deep inelastic scattering, grisly
  • Re: Re : Deep inelastic scattering, Kasper Jens Larsen
• Re: Non-commuting transformations in quantum mechanics, Arkadiusz Jadczyk
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Non-commuting transformations in quantum mechanics, thomas_larsson_01
• Does F=d^2m/dt^2 x describe any known physical systems?, ANS
  • Re: Does F=d^2m/dt^2 x describe any known physical systems?, Dirk Bruere
  • Re: Does F=d^2m/dt^2 x describe any known physical systems?, Doug Goncz
  • Re: Does F=d^2m/dt^2 x describe any known physical systems?, ANS
  • Re: Does F=d^2m/dt^2 x describe any known physical systems?, Mark Fisher
• How to understand this in "Transformation of distribution function", Dale
  • Re: How to understand this in "Transformation of distribution function", Arkadiusz Jadczyk
    • Re: How to understand this in "Transformation of distribution function", Arkadiusz Jadczyk
  • Re: How to understand this in "Transformation of distribution function", Andreas Moser
• Wavefunctions and Gauge Transformations in General Relativity, Versus Same in QED, Jay R. Yablon
• The adventure of physics - new version for free download, chri_schiller
• Re: gravitomagnetic effect 10^20 large then predicted by GR ?, Richard Saam
• Super Algebra of Cartan Forms, Jack Sarfatti
  • Re: Super Algebra of Cartan Forms, Arkadiusz Jadczyk
• Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, John Bell
  • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, Oh No
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, tttito
  • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, Oh No
  • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, John Bell
    • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, Oh No
  • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, John Bell
    • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, Oh No
      • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, John Bell
  • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, John Bell
    • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, Oh No
      • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, John Bell
  • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, Oh No
  • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, John Bell
  • Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?, John Bell
• ArXiv to "usuall" publication, Calvin D. Ritchie
  • Re: ArXiv to "usuall" publication, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
    • Re: ArXiv to "usuall" publication, Douglas Natelson
    • Re: ArXiv to "usuall" publication, Calvin D. Ritchie
      • Re: ArXiv to "usuall" publication, Timo A. Nieminen
      • Re: ArXiv to "usuall" publication, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
      • Re: ArXiv to "usuall" publication, carlip-nospam
    • Re: ArXiv to "usuall" publication, Lou Pecora
  • Re: ArXiv to "usuall" publication, Mike Vaughn
  • Re: ArXiv to "usuall" publication, David M. Palmer
    • Re: ArXiv to "usuall" publication, Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
    • Re: ArXiv to "usuall" publication, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
      • Re: ArXiv to "usuall" publication, Calvin D. Ritchie
      • Re: ArXiv to "usuall" publication, David M. Palmer
  • Re: ArXiv to "usuall" publication, Oh No
• Re: Question about the De Broglie Wavelength, jamievicary
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Question about the De Broglie Wavelength, Tom
• Re: Fun problem, Cl.Massé
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Fun problem, Cl.Massé
    • Re: Fun problem, Oh No
      • Re: Fun problem, Cl . Massé
  • Re: Fun problem, Blackbird
    • Re: Fun problem, Ralph Hartley
      • Re: Fun problem, Blackbird
  • Re: Fun problem, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Fun problem, Yvon Sauvageau
    • Re: Fun problem, Cl.Massé
  • Re: Fun problem, Yvon Sauvageau
• Re: Deep inelastic scattering, Kasper Jens Larsen
• Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?, bz
  • Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?, Blackbird
    • Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?, bz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Entanglement (was Podkletnov) revisited?, John Bell
• Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories), Oh No
  • Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories), Hendrik van Hees
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories), Oh No
  • Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories), Oh No
  • Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories), M.LeBel
    • Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories), J. Horta
  • Re: Super Copenhagen Interpretation (Consistent Histories), Aaron Denney

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(10)