Re: Fun problem
- From: Oh No <NotI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 05:48:08 +0000 (UTC)
Thus spake Cl.Massé <postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Henning Makholm" <henning@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:All too true. I just had some problem with idealising "point" particle
873bg16cgk.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It can also get stuck on a non-repeating path, if the ration between
the time one vertical bounce takes and the time it takes to move from
one wall to the other is irrational.
Strangely, if the path is non repeating, the point won't escape, but it will
escape for all repeating path. The explanation is that if the path is
repeating, it must go through its entry point or a symmetrical one at some
time. If not, any time it tries, each time differently, it'll fail because
there are infinitely more irrational numbers than rational ones.
to quite such an extreme. However, it does occur to me that if one does
take things to that level of precision, one really ought to allow that
quantum effects should be taken into account and that the particle could
escape via quantum tunnelling if it gets close enough to a critical
escape point.
Regards
--
Charles Francis
substitute charles for NotI to email
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fun problem
- From: Cl . Massé
- Re: Fun problem
- References:
- Re: Fun problem
- From: Cl.Massé
- Re: Fun problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Is temporal sign ambiguity inherent in Einstein's general relativistic field equation?
- Next by Date: Super Algebra of Cartan Forms
- Previous by thread: Re: Fun problem
- Next by thread: Re: Fun problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|