Re: Unnatural phenonena


Dirk Bruere at NeoPax ha scritto:

Something that crossed my mind recently.
Is there any laboratory phenomenon that has not already existed in
Nature? The only thing I could thing of would be cryogenics below the
cosmic background temp. Anything else?

I think the underlying question is the following.

"In which cases is Nature's randomness unable to match
intelligence-driven outputs, under the same set of physical laws?"

The answer may depend on defining the random/intelligent boundary, a
very tricky task. If you regard man and physicists as a necessary
consquence of evolution, the answer is a tautological "never".

IV

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Curing Einsteins Disease (is Copyrighted)
    ... Laws of Nature by many ... that physicists take the lazy way out... ... from gravity a greater force than a slower object of the same mass. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Curing Einsteins Disease (is Copyrighted)
    ... But true Laws of Nature have ... They *discover* the laws by which nature works. ... that physicists take the lazy way out... ... from gravity a greater force than a slower object of the same mass. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Ether-SR clocks hidden time rates
    ... issue to your strawman and try dealing with relativity as if you ... >> Nature and many thousands of physicists disagree with you. ... a pentagon, too, based on the language of geometry being peculiar? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Physicists and Laws.
    ... Physicists do not dictate to Nature their laws. ... strange, as the physicists think of it. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Doubts about relativity dogmas
    ... rather than just making vague insinuations? ... would work instead just describing nature phenomena. ... all you have is unverifiable rumors. ... There exists an increasing group of physicists thinking about many ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)