Re: Evaluating Spin Network States

On 2006-08-19, Michael McBreen <michael.mcbreen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello. I'm finishing an undergraduate research project on lattice
gauge theory, and I have a question about spin network states: in
short, is there any efficient method for evaluating them when some
random group elements g_1, g_2, g_3... are assigned to the edges,
beyond doing the whole contraction ``by hand``? My gauge groups are
SU(2) and SU(3).

To avoid confusion, here's my understanding of spin network states:
1) Take some lattice (I'm interested in large cubic lattices) with
nodes n_i and edges e_ij.
2) For each edge e_ij, choose a gauge group variable g_ij and
irreducible representation rho_ij.
3) For each node, choose an intertwiner t_i from the tensor product
of the representations of the in-going edges and dual reps of the
outgoing edges to the trivial representation.
4) Contract all the rho_ij(g_ij) with the corresponding t_i and t_j,
so that the whole thing is contracted to a number.
5) The spin network state is the function of the g_ij that returns this number.

I'm interested in the cases with either arbitrary g_ij or, less
ambitiously, with all the g_ij = 1 (i.e. a pure contraction of
intertwiners). The number I want is the sum of the results for each
specific choice of intertwiners, i.e. I sum the result over an
orthonormal basis of intertwiners at each node.

Out of curiosity, why do you want your result to depend on the group
element g_ij? If your lattice has L links and the gauge group is N
dimensional, then you are essentially calculating a function of L*N
parameters. As a rule of thumb, the more parameters you have the harder
your function is to evaluate.

In the context of lattice gauge theories, we are usually interested in
integrating an amplitude calculated in the way you outline over all
possible assignments for the group elements g_ij. This integral factors
into integrals over individual g_ij which can be done knowing a little
bit about representation theory (you need to know how to integrate
matrix elements of a representation over the group). Henceforth, the
dependence on g_ij is eliminated and instead of an integral over over
many copies of the gauge group, you'll have a sum over irreps and
intertwiners labeling vertices and edges of the lattice (details depend
on the situation).

Depending on what you get after group integration, you may need only to
evaluate small closed spin networks. For those you might find tricks
similar to the Christensen-Egan algorithm that Greg Egan already
mentioned.

Hope this helps.

Igor

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: discrete gauge transformation?
    ... Are there any discrete gauge transformations? ... In continuum gauge theory the gauge transformations are assumed to be ... This means that the gauge group can also be any finite group so it can ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: Riemann sum with variable interval widths?
    ... (replacing a uniform bound with a "gauge" function), ... you get is the Henstock-Kurzweil integral rather then a Riemann ... integrating many more functions. ...
    (sci.math)