If we had a Renormalized Theory of Gravitation, What Broad Features Would we Expect it to Have?
- From: "Jay R. Yablon" <jyablon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 19:55:35 +0000 (UTC)
In QED and QCD, is it correct to hold the view that the upshot of
renormalization after all the loop diagrams are calculated, cutoffs
chosen, etc., is that the interaction couplings "run," and more to the
point, that the measurable objects one observes must be specified -- not
in the abstract -- but in relation to the probe energy mu used for their
measurement?
Would it then be fair to suppose that one feature of a renormalized
gravitational theory, would a metric tensor g_uv(mu) and an invariant
metric interval ds(mu) which must similarly be specified only in
relation to the probe energy at which they are measured?
Thanks,
Jay.
_____________________________
Jay R. Yablon
Email: jyablon@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Website: http://home.nycap.rr.com/jry/FermionMass.htm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: If we had a Renormalizable Theory of Gravitation,What Broad Features
- From: Uncle Al
- Re: If we had a Renormalized Theory of Gravitation, What Broad Features Would we Expect it to Have?
- From: markwh04
- Re: If we had a Renormalizable Theory of Gravitation, What Broad Features Would we Expect it to Have?
- From: sr
- Re: If we had a Renormalized Theory of Gravitation, What Broad Features Would we Expect it to Have?
- From: Igor Khavkine
- Re: If we had a Renormalizable Theory of Gravitation,What Broad Features
- Prev by Date: Re: the black fishing hole
- Next by Date: Re: Brownian motion on S^n, H^n
- Previous by thread: Re: the black fishing hole
- Next by thread: Re: If we had a Renormalized Theory of Gravitation, What Broad Features Would we Expect it to Have?
- Index(es):