Re: Alternative approach to QM action at a distance

My response to EPR and all such things is, at it has been since
I first read about it: Still confused after all these years. It just
does
not penetrate.

Oh, I get the point of Bell's inequality. I think it's a brilliant
result.
But I don't understand how this works in QM. The problem I have
is, when I look at QM, I don't see anything that moves the way
that this seems to require that something moves. It confuses me.

Can anybody suggest a good text or two to read on this stuff?

I've got Bell's book "Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics"
and, sadly, I remain confused. Any other books I can read?
Socks

.