sci.physics.research

• Date Index

• Re: need ideas for what to research/report on in PHYSICS, Uncle Al
• photon's wavefunction, kvblake
• Interval before Nuclear Decay, David
  • Re: Interval before Nuclear Decay, Uncle Al
  • Re: Interval before Nuclear Decay, Boo
  • Re: Interval before Nuclear Decay, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
• korteweg deVries equation and solitons, verdigris
• Gauge coupling and String Landscape?, Benjamin
• Derivation for the Heisenberg model for interaction between spins in a crystal, dhaile
• Propagation of electric pulses in superconductors, eangelopoulos@xxxxxxxxx
• Coherence length and bandwidth of photons, Robin Whittle
  • Re: Coherence length and bandwidth of photons, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Coherence length and bandwidth of photons, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Coherence length and bandwidth of photons, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Coherence length and bandwidth of photons, Robin Whittle
• Question about R.Brandenerger's talk at KITP workshop on singularities, melroysoares
  • Re: Question about R.Brandenerger's talk at KITP workshop on singularities, ebunn
• I'm looking for some interesting articles about nonlinear properties of Alq3 and DCM, planck
• Feynman Paths and the Coefficients of Stationary Wave Solutions, ANS
  • Re: Feynman Paths and the Coefficients of Stationary Wave Solutions, Igor Khavkine
• The Sixth Sense of Plants, Bossavit
  • Re: The Sixth Sense of Plants, Gerry Quinn
    • Re: The Sixth Sense of Plants, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
      • Re: The Sixth Sense of Plants, Gerry Quinn
  • Re: The Sixth Sense of Plants, Andy Resnick
• Proof of Singularities, John (Liberty) Bell
  • Re: Proof of Singularities, Oh No
  • Re: Proof of Singularities, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Proof of Singularities, Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
    • Re: Proof of Singularities, John (Liberty) Bell
      • Re: Proof of Singularities, jacques . fric
      • Re: Proof of Singularities, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Proof of Singularities, carlip-nospam
  • Re: Proof of Singularities, René Meyer
  • Re: Proof of Singularities, carlip-nospam
  • Re: Proof of Singularities, jacques . fric
  • Re: Proof of Singularities, jacques . fric
  • Re: Proof of Singularities, John (Liberty) Bell
• feedback on paper about inconsistency of Schrodinger eqn with macroscopic observations, iuval
  • Re: feedback on paper about inconsistency of Schrodinger eqn with macroscopic observations, crowlogic
    • Re: feedback on paper about inconsistency of Schrodinger eqn with macroscopic observations, Ace0f_5pades
    • Re: feedback on paper about inconsistency of Schrodinger eqn with macroscopic observations, iuval
  • Re: feedback on paper about inconsistency of Schrodinger eqn with macroscopic observations, Christophe de Dinechin
  • Re: feedback on paper about inconsistency of Schrodinger eqn with macroscopic observations, Ace0f_5pades
  • Re: feedback on paper about inconsistency of Schrodinger eqn with macroscopic observations, iuval
• Felix Ehrenhaft, Hans
  • Re: Felix Ehrenhaft, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Felix Ehrenhaft, Tom
      • Re: Felix Ehrenhaft, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Felix Ehrenhaft, Tom
  • Re: Felix Ehrenhaft, Igor Khavkine
• Reception of Randell Mills' Work, Tstolper
  • Re: Reception of Randell Mills' Work, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
    • Re: Reception of Randell Mills' Work, Dushan Mitrovich
      • Re: Reception of Randell Mills' Work, Igor Khavkine
• Derivation of General from "maximum force principle", Review of this method, jacques . fric
• Charged black hole in electromagnetic field, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: Charged black hole in electromagnetic field, CarlB
  • Re: Charged black hole in electromagnetic field, Jonathan Scott
  • Re: Charged black hole in electromagnetic field, Bill J.
• Reversibility of evaporating black holes, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: Reversibility of evaporating black holes, Oh No
  • Re: Reversibility of evaporating black holes, Gerry Quinn
• On explanation of negative energy states and electron pair creation, zak
  • Re: On explanation of negative energy states and electron pair creation, Hendrik van Hees
    • Re: On explanation of negative energy states and electron pair creation, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: On explanation of negative energy states and electron pair creation, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: On explanation of negative energy states and electron pair creation, Oh No
    • Re: On explanation of negative energy states and electron pair creation, Hendrik van Hees
  • Re: On explanation of negative energy states and electron pair creation, John (Liberty) Bell
  • Re: On explanation of negative energy states and electron pair creation, Oh No
  • Re: On explanation of negative energy states and electron pair creation, Oh No
• Temporal Coherence, Thomas Smid
• Gluon propagator in the infrared, jon . lester
  • Re: Gluon propagator in the infrared, René Meyer
  • Re: Gluon propagator in the infrared, mattreece@xxxxxxxxx
• Discrete Dilation Invariance and Self-Similarity, rloldershaw@xxxxxxxxxxx
• MIT's Walter Lewin's twice surprises the EE professors! (fun), Cyberkatru
  • Re: MIT's Walter Lewin's twice surprises the EE professors! (fun), William R. Frensley
    • Re: MIT's Walter Lewin's twice surprises the EE professors! (fun), Cyberkatru
      • Re: MIT's Walter Lewin's twice surprises the EE professors! (fun), William R. Frensley
  • Re: MIT's Walter Lewin's twice surprises the EE professors! (fun), Chris H. Fleming
    • Re: MIT's Walter Lewin's twice surprises the EE professors! (fun), billb
  • Re: MIT's Walter Lewin's twice surprises the EE professors! (fun), Cyberkatru
  • Re: MIT's Walter Lewin's twice surprises the EE professors! (fun), Grouchy
  • Re: MIT's Walter Lewin's twice surprises the EE professors! (fun), billb
  • Re: MIT's Walter Lewin's twice surprises the EE professors! (fun), jmc8197
    • Re: MIT's Walter Lewin's twice surprises the EE professors! (fun), Cyberkatru
      • Re: MIT's Walter Lewin's twice surprises the EE professors! (fun), jmc8197
      • Re: MIT's Walter Lewin's twice surprises the EE professors! (fun), Bossavit
  • Re: MIT's Walter Lewin's twice surprises the EE professors! (fun), Gerard Westendorp
• Re: Exploding Relativistic Bombs. (Was vector addition/subtraction of velocities), harry
• Physics of Immortality, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
  • Re: Physics of Immortality, ianparker2
    • Re: Physics of Immortality, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
  • Re: Physics of Immortality, Just G. Waller
    • Re: Physics of Immortality, Just G. Waller
  • Re: Physics of Immortality, alfansome
    • Re: Physics of Immortality, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
      • Re: Physics of Immortality, alfansome
      • Re: Physics of Immortality, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
      • Re: Physics of Immortality, Mike
    • Re: Physics of Immortality, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
  • Re: Physics of Immortality, Oz
• The adventure of physics - new book edition for free download, Christoph Schiller
• Re: Feynman diagrams and space-time, Hontas Farmer
• Simple gravitational questions about orbit stabilities, Just G. Waller
  • Re: Simple gravitational questions about orbit stabilities, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
  • Re: Simple gravitational questions about orbit stabilities, MTwain
  • Re: Simple gravitational questions about orbit stabilities, Jonathan Thornburg -- remove -animal to reply
• Renormalized Curved Spacetime Feynman Path Integrals by Epstein-Glaser, markwh04
  • Re: Renormalized Curved Spacetime Feynman Path Integrals by Epstein-Glaser, Marc Nardmann
• Re: Relativistic vector addition/subtraction of velocities, Greg Egan
  • Re: Relativistic vector addition/subtraction of velocities, Oh No
  • Re: Relativistic vector addition/subtraction of velocities, jambaugh
    • Re: Relativistic vector addition/subtraction of velocities, Chalky
      • Re: Relativistic vector addition/subtraction of velocities, harry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Relativistic vector addition/subtraction of velocities, Greg Egan
    • Re: Relativistic vector addition/subtraction of velocities, Chalky
  • Re: Relativistic vector addition/subtraction of velocities, Greg Egan
    • Re: Relativistic vector addition/subtraction of velocities, Chalky
• Cross section for scattering of gauge bosons and Majorana neutrinos, denis.besak@xxxxxx
  • Re: Cross section for scattering of gauge bosons and Majorana neutrinos, denis.besak@xxxxxx
  • Re: Cross section for scattering of gauge bosons and Majorana neutrinos, Squark
• A theoretical physics FAQ, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: A theoretical physics FAQ, markwh04
• The exact and the approximate Schwarzschild metrics--which is better?, Surfer
  • Re: The exact and the approximate Schwarzschild metrics--which is better?, carlip-nospam
  • Re: The exact and the approximate Schwarzschild metrics--which is better?, jacques . fric
  • Re: The exact and the approximate Schwarzschild metrics--which is better?, Surfer
• impossibility of stable equilibrium in purely electrostatic field, jumanicus
  • Re: impossibility of stable equilibrium in purely electrostatic field, ebunn
    • Re: impossibility of stable equilibrium in purely electrostatic field, Gerard Westendorp
  • Re: impossibility of stable equilibrium in purely electrostatic field, Thomas Smid
  • Re: impossibility of stable equilibrium in purely electrostatic field, Neil Bates
• Re: How to quantize a gauge theory which is invariant on-shell?, Squark
• time, motion and space, jjoensuu
  • Re: time, motion and space, harry
  • Re: time, motion and space, carlip-nospam
    • Re: time, motion and space, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
    • Re: time, motion and space, Murat Ozer
      • Re: time, motion and space, carlip-nospam
  • Re: time, motion and space, Uncle Al
  • Re: time, motion and space, Oh No
  • Message not available
    • Re: time, motion and space, Uncle Al
  • Re: time, motion and space, Grouchy
    • Re: time, motion and space, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: time, motion and space, Grouchy
  • Re: time, motion and space, jacques . fric
  • Re: time, motion and space, jambaugh
  • Re: time, motion and space, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: time, motion and space, Grouchy
• The Black Fishing Hole, Greg Egan
  • Re: The Black Fishing Hole, jambaugh
• Re: What exactly is wrong with Huygens' principle in two dimensions?, Nicolaas Vroom
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What exactly is wrong with Huygens' principle in two dimensions?, Nicolaas Vroom
  • Re: What exactly is wrong with Huygens' principle in two dimensions?, Hans de Vries
  • Re: What exactly is wrong with Huygens' principle in two dimensions?, John Baez
• subjectivity, Cyberkatru
  • Re: subjectivity, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: subjectivity, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: subjectivity, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: subjectivity, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: subjectivity, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: subjectivity, petit beurre
    • Re: subjectivity, Cyberkatru
      • Re: subjectivity, anonym
      • Re: subjectivity, Ralph Hartley
  • Re: subjectivity, Cyberkatru
    • Re: subjectivity, anonym
• Discovery of the axion?, Edward C. Jones
  • Re: Discovery of the axion?, Fred Diether
  • Re: Discovery of the axion?, Dan Riley
    • Re: Discovery of the axion?, Igor Khavkine
• Invitation: Join a group to discuss a model of super-relativistic particles, EF Ferrari
• Fourier Analysis and Causality, Thomas Smid
  • Re: Fourier Analysis and Causality, Timo A. Nieminen
  • Re: Fourier Analysis and Causality, Boo
    • Re: Fourier Analysis and Causality, Thomas Smid
    • Re: Fourier Analysis and Causality, robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: Fourier Analysis and Causality, Cyberkatru
  • Re: Fourier Analysis and Causality, robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: Fourier Analysis and Causality, petit beurre
  • Re: Fourier Analysis and Causality, Eckard Blumschein
• Re: Einstein's principle of equivalence, Schmidt
• Re: Einstien's principle of equivalence, Schmidt
  • Re: Einstien's principle of equivalence, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Einstien's principle of equivalence, jacques . fric
  • Re: Einstien's principle of equivalence, jambaugh
• conceptual puzzle, movng charge, Cyberkatru
  • Re: conceptual puzzle, movng charge, carlip-nospam
    • Re: conceptual puzzle, movng charge, Cyberkatru
  • Re: conceptual puzzle, movng charge, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: conceptual puzzle, movng charge, Timo A. Nieminen
  • Re: conceptual puzzle, movng charge, jambaugh
  • Re: conceptual puzzle, movng charge, petit beurre
  • Re: conceptual puzzle, movng charge, chantal . roth
• Dispersion question., Cyberkatru
  • Re: Dispersion question., Timo A. Nieminen
    • Re: Dispersion question., Cyberkatru
      • Re: Dispersion question., Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Dispersion question., Cyberkatru
  • Re: Dispersion question., Roland Franzius
  • Re: Dispersion question., Timo A. Nieminen
  • Re: Dispersion question., petit beurre
  • Re: Dispersion question., Igor Khavkine
• Re: Objective reduction, Mikael Djurfeldt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Objective reduction, Schmidt
• Re: Shortest Non-Ionizing Wavelength for human body at any intensity/duration?, jwill
  • Re: Shortest Non-Ionizing Wavelength for human body at any intensity/duration?, Timo A. Nieminen

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint