Re: MIT's Walter Lewin's twice surprises the EE professors! (fun)
- From: Cyberkatru <cyberkatru@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 20:16:42 +0000 (UTC)
Is there is a fundamental problem in the way he has used Faraday's Law?
He traverses the circuit to calculate the total E_dot_dl, even though E
has been modified by the circuit rather than being simply E due just to
the changing B.
Jason Walters.
I don't think so. He is just using the usual idealized assumtion that
the wires themselves have zero resistence and that the resistance is
concentrated in the resistor.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- MIT's Walter Lewin's twice surprises the EE professors! (fun)
- From: Cyberkatru
- Re: MIT's Walter Lewin's twice surprises the EE professors! (fun)
- From: jmc8197
- MIT's Walter Lewin's twice surprises the EE professors! (fun)
- Prev by Date: Re: Relativistic vector addition/subtraction of velocities
- Next by Date: Re: Felix Ehrenhaft
- Previous by thread: Re: MIT's Walter Lewin's twice surprises the EE professors! (fun)
- Next by thread: Re: MIT's Walter Lewin's twice surprises the EE professors! (fun)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
