sci.physics.research

• Date Index

• Re: Renormalized Curved Spacetime Feynman Path Integrals by Epstein-Glaser, Marc Nardmann
• Fell's Thm and Haag's Thm: How do we know there are interactions?, David Baker
• Modern experimental limits of gravity, Gen Zhang
  • Re: Modern experimental limits of gravity, Uncle Al
• Books on the nature of time?, Robert
  • Re: Books on the nature of time?, Marc Millis
  • Re: Books on the nature of time?, zviki_m
    • Re: Books on the nature of time?, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Books on the nature of time?, Oh No
  • Re: Books on the nature of time?, pellis
    • Re: Books on the nature of time?, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
  • Re: Books on the nature of time?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Books on the nature of time?, fkampas
  • Re: Books on the nature of time?, T.M. Sommers
  • Re: Books on the nature of time?, captpaul101
• the determinant as a path integral?, this is not my real name
• Mathematical Foundations of QM, curtvon
  • Re: Mathematical Foundations of QM, tkupsche
  • Re: Mathematical Foundations of QM, vivishek
    • Re: Mathematical Foundations of QM, curtvon
  • Re: Mathematical Foundations of QM, John F
  • Re: Mathematical Foundations of QM, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Mathematical Foundations of QM, Lou Pecora
  • Re: Mathematical Foundations of QM, Oh No
  • Re: Mathematical Foundations of QM, kushal
• Quantum Field Theory Without Divergences or Renormalization III, markwh04
• QM/absorbtion lines puzzle, Cyberkatru
  • Re: QM/absorbtion lines puzzle, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
  • Re: QM/absorbtion lines puzzle, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: QM/absorbtion lines puzzle, Cyberkatru
      • Re: QM/absorbtion lines puzzle, Uncle Al
      • Re: QM/absorbtion lines puzzle, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: QM/absorbtion lines puzzle, johnsdave39
      • Re: QM/absorbtion lines puzzle, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: QM/absorbtion lines puzzle, Uncle Al
  • Re: QM/absorbtion lines puzzle, Timo A. Nieminen
  • Re: QM/absorbtion lines puzzle, Darwin123
  • Re: QM/absorbtion lines puzzle, Darwin123
• Higgs Field, SpitfireAce
  • Re: Higgs Field, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Higgs Field, Chalky
    • Re: Higgs Field, Marc Nardmann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Higgs Field, Paul Ellis
    • Re: Higgs Field, Tom Roberts
• GR-friendly Quantum Mechanics, V. Trifonov
  • Re: GR-friendly Quantum Mechanics, iuval
• Euler-Lagrange Equations in QFT, continued, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Euler-Lagrange Equations in QFT, continued, Kay zum Felde
    • Re: Euler-Lagrange Equations in QFT, continued, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: Euler-Lagrange Equations in QFT, continued, Kay zum Felde
  • Re: Euler-Lagrange Equations in QFT, continued, Igor Khavkine
• Gravitational Wave Assumptions, rlolders...@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Gravitational Wave Assumptions, ebunn
  • Re: Gravitational Wave Assumptions, Darwin123
• Gaussian Intergals, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Gaussian Intergals, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Gaussian Intergals, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: Gaussian Intergals, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Gaussian Intergals, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: Gaussian Intergals, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Gaussian Intergals, Jay R. Yablon
    • Re: Gaussian Intergals, Jay R. Yablon
• Poisson brackets in relativistic mechanics, Gen Zhang
  • Re: Poisson brackets in relativistic mechanics, Alexey Popov
  • Re: Poisson brackets in relativistic mechanics, markwh04
• Wavelength of Ripples in a Pond, Darwin
  • Re: Wavelength of Ripples in a Pond, Timo Nieminen
    • Re: Wavelength of Ripples in a Pond, Darwin123
      • Re: Wavelength of Ripples in a Pond, Timo A. Nieminen
    • Re: Wavelength of Ripples in a Pond, Darwin123
      • Re: Wavelength of Ripples in a Pond, Timo Nieminen
  • Re: Wavelength of Ripples in a Pond, Uncle Al
  • Re: Wavelength of Ripples in a Pond, Andy Resnick
• Re: What is the electric field near a rotating wire, and why doesn't it follow logic of moving individual sections?, Lorentz
  • Re: What is the electric field near a rotating wire, and why doesn't it follow logic of moving individual sections?, Neil Bates
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What is the electric field near a rotating wire, and why doesn't it follow logic of moving individual sections?, Lorentz
• Re: Awareness of Nottale's scale relativity work, arivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Bound-free pair production, Carsten Agger
• Smolin's "hidden regions", mark_horn
  • Re: Smolin's "hidden regions", mathman
    • Re: Smolin's "hidden regions", mark_horn
• Re: Are EASER & MAASER possible?, AES
• Please Help with Dimensional analysis of Gaussian Integrals, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Please Help with Dimensional analysis of Gaussian Integrals, ebunn
    • Re: Please Help with Dimensional analysis of Gaussian Integrals, Carsten Agger
• Maxwell versus Compton II, kvblake
• "Killing vectors and conserved quantities", AGS
• Re: GR and quantum mechanics, iuval
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: GR and quantum mechanics, iuval
• brinkmans equation, dala
  • Re: brinkmans equation, Andy Resnick
• Re: Einstein 1915-1917 quantum papers available online?, Raymond Manzoni
  • Re: Einstein 1915-1917 quantum papers available online?, AES
• gravity question, gandiman
  • Re: gravity question, Uncle Al
  • Re: gravity question, paulaireilly
    • Re: gravity question, CarlB
      • Re: gravity question, ebunn
  • Re: gravity question, Lorentz
• Euler-Lagrange equations in QFT??, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Euler-Lagrange equations in QFT??, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Euler-Lagrange equations in QFT??, René Meyer
• ADMINISTRIVIA: Posts lost between Jul 07 and 11, Igor Khavkine
• Journal of Physics Students (JPS) : Call for Papers*, jphysstu
• Generations and Chan-Paton factors, arivero@xxxxxxxxx
• numerical solution of the time-dependent Schrodinger equation, Alexander Paul
  • Re: numerical solution of the time-dependent Schrodinger equation, Chris H. Fleming
    • Re: numerical solution of the time-dependent Schrodinger equation, Chris H. Fleming
  • Re: numerical solution of the time-dependent Schrodinger equation, jpr0
  • Re: numerical solution of the time-dependent Schrodinger equation, Bill Frensley
• Re: Question about Path Intergals, Igor Khavkine
• v. Neumann's belief in Hilbert space, Eckard Blumschein
  • Re: v. Neumann's belief in Hilbert space, scerir
  • Re: v. Neumann's belief in Hilbert space, philneo2001
• Interaction between different gauge fields, Gen Zhang
  • Re: Interaction between different gauge fields, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Interaction between different gauge fields, markwh04
• Why is this model of relativistic elasticity flawed?, Greg Egan
  • Re: Why is this model of relativistic elasticity flawed?, John Park
  • Re: Why is this model of relativistic elasticity flawed?, Gerry Quinn
  • Re: Why is this model of relativistic elasticity flawed?, John Park
    • Re: Why is this model of relativistic elasticity flawed?, Greg Egan
  • Re: Why is this model of relativistic elasticity flawed?, Lorentz
  • Re: Why is this model of relativistic elasticity flawed?, Darwin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why is this model of relativistic elasticity flawed?, Greg Egan
  • Re: Why is this model of relativistic elasticity flawed?, Greg Egan
    • Re: Why is this model of relativistic elasticity flawed?, John Park
      • Re: Why is this model of relativistic elasticity flawed?, Greg Egan
    • Re: Why is this model of relativistic elasticity flawed?, Gerard Westendorp
      • Re: Why is this model of relativistic elasticity flawed?, Greg Egan
      • Re: Why is this model of relativistic elasticity flawed?, Gerard Westendorp
      • Re: Why is this model of relativistic elasticity flawed?, Gerard Westendorp
      • Re: Why is this model of relativistic elasticity flawed?, Greg Egan
  • Re: Why is this model of relativistic elasticity flawed?, Greg Egan
• Re: Tangent bundle geometry and Lagrangian dynamics, senderista
  • Re: Tangent bundle geometry and Lagrangian dynamics, markwh04
  • Re: Tangent bundle geometry and Lagrangian dynamics, markwh04
  • Re: Tangent bundle geometry and Lagrangian dynamics, markwh04
• Yang Mills and Dirac Algebra Trace Theorems?, Jay R. Yablon
• Basic QFT, VAMSI PRITHAM PINGALI
  • Re: Basic QFT, Igor Khavkine
• What is the electric field very close to an electron, and what is the total field energy?, Neil Bates
  • Re: What is the electric field very close to an electron, and what is the total field energy?, Oh No
• Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Chalky
  • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
    • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Chalky
    • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Chalky
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Oh No
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Chalky
  • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, ebunn
    • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Chalky
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, ebunn
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Chalky
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Richard Saam
  • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Uncle Al
    • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Chalky
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Uncle Al
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, ebunn
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Chalky
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Chalky
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Chalky
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Chalky
      • Message not available
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Chalky
      • Message not available
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Chalky
      • Message not available
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Richard Saam
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Thomas Smid
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Chalky
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Thomas Smid
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Chalky
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Chalky
    • Violation of First Law of Thermodynamics by Proof of Kirchoff's Law, Chalky
  • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Thomas Smid
    • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Chalky
    • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Chalky
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Thomas Smid
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Chalky
      • Message not available
      • Re: Thermal radiation and optical opacity, Chalky
• Re: Simiplified expression for Yang-Mills generators to the fourth power?, Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Spectrum of Waterfall noise, Ian Parker
  • Re: Spectrum of Waterfall noise, Chalky
    • Re: Spectrum of Waterfall noise, patmpowers
      • Re: Spectrum of Waterfall noise, Chalky
      • Re: Spectrum of Waterfall noise, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
      • Re: Spectrum of Waterfall noise, Chalky
      • Re: Spectrum of Waterfall noise, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
      • Re: Spectrum of Waterfall noise, Chalky
      • Re: Spectrum of Waterfall noise, Chalky
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Spectrum of Waterfall noise, Chalky
    • Re: Spectrum of Waterfall noise, Ian Parker
      • Re: Spectrum of Waterfall noise, Chalky
      • Re: Spectrum of Waterfall noise, Ian Parker
      • Re: Spectrum of Waterfall noise, Richard Saam
  • Re: Spectrum of Waterfall noise, andyeverett57
    • Re: Spectrum of Waterfall noise, Chalky
• help on electron detection, philosophus
  • Re: help on electron detection, BorisDCLCXVI
  • Re: help on electron detection, Douglas Eagleson

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint