Re: Fusion chain reaction?
- From: nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (J. J. Lodder)
- Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 17:11:29 +0000 (UTC)
Joseph Warner <Joseph.D.Warner@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46E89E93.C0A22070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
eastmond@xxxxxxxxx wrote:As I remember that doesn't work on paper. The muon's half-life is too short.
temperature exceed a critical value. Fusion spontaneously
Light element fusion requires the product of density, time, and
disassembles without propagation (second order reaction) unless
actively confined - implosion, gravitation, external EM fields,
possibly inertia. Deuterium is nobody's idea of inertial confinement
- including deuterated polyethylene. You only have a few shakes (tens
of nanoseconds) to get the job done before the mass thermally expands,
reaction rate dropping as the inverse square of concentration.
You could dump in muons. That works on paper and nowhere else.
It's long enough for producing many muon-catalyzed fusion events.
The problem is producing muons cheaply enough.
When some clever soul invents a way to produce muons
for a few hundred MeV apiece the proces
will become quite practical.
Jan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fusion chain reaction?
- From: Joseph Warner
- Re: Fusion chain reaction?
- References:
- Fusion chain reaction?
- From: eastmond
- Re: Fusion chain reaction?
- From: Uncle Al
- Re: Fusion chain reaction?
- From: Joseph Warner
- Fusion chain reaction?
- Prev by Date: Re: Never mind (Strange aspects of the Franson experiment)
- Next by Date: dirac equation in curved spacetime
- Previous by thread: Re: Fusion chain reaction?
- Next by thread: Re: Fusion chain reaction?
- Index(es):