Re: Standard Kilogram
- From: Uncle Al <UncleAl0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:28:27 +0000 (UTC)
enders@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Sep 19, 6:31 pm, "Ian Macmillan" <iand...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The recent report about a 50ug discrepancy in the comparison of the standard
1 Kg mass with its copies led me to wonder how such precision is attained,
50ug being 5 x 10^-9 Kg.
Can anyone describe the method of making such a comparison, and how the
degree of confidence in the result is estimated?
All the best
Ian Macmillan
I assume such a precision is possible by converting a measuring of
mass into a measuring of length.
Measuring a small signal within a big background is not clever. Null
the background to leave the net signal remaining, as with a balance
rather thana scale. The necessary mass differential sensitivity is
not unreasonable to obtain in hardware,
http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v89/i16/e161102
"Determination of the Gravitational Constant with a Beam Balance "
Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 161102 (2002)
Or, e-mail the folks and ask them how they determined the change.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Standard Kilogram
- From: Ian Macmillan
- Re: Standard Kilogram
- References:
- Standard Kilogram
- From: Ian Macmillan
- Re: Standard Kilogram
- From: enders
- Standard Kilogram
- Prev by Date: Re: wick rotation
- Next by Date: Re: Relativity without tears
- Previous by thread: Re: Standard Kilogram
- Next by thread: Re: Standard Kilogram
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|