Re: Wave Function Collapse.
- From: "Rich L." <ralivingston@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 03:47:22 +0000 (UTC)
On Oct 7, 9:31 am, David Winsemius <doe_s...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Rich L." <ralivings...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote innews:1191464959.566441.170510@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
On Oct 3, 1:31 pm, Vipassana <veepass...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:snip
How the electron, photon detectors in double slit experiments work?The most common detector is a photomultiplier (PM) tube.
Another common detector is an Avalanche Photo Diode (APD).snip
Does that answer your question, or did I miss your point?
Didn't Young use a piece of paper and his eyes?
Rhodopsin, retinal, rod cells, and membrane chemistry might be a more
technical answer along those lines. For best results with this equipment,
you should use a photon source in the 500 nm region.
--
David Winsemius
Well, yes, that is true! Perhaps I've been focusing too much on the
single photon in the apparatus at a time experiments. You can
certainly demonstrate the interference fringes using any photosenstive
detector: film, photodiode, CCD camera, even eyball if the source is
intense enough and in the visible EM spectrum.
Rich L.
.
- References:
- Wave Function Collapse.
- From: Vipassana
- Re: Wave Function Collapse.
- From: Rich L.
- Re: Wave Function Collapse.
- From: David Winsemius
- Wave Function Collapse.
- Prev by Date: Re: Maxwell's Equations
- Next by Date: Re: Maxwell's Equations
- Previous by thread: Re: Wave Function Collapse.
- Next by thread: Re: Relativity without tears
- Index(es):