sci.physics.research

• Date Index

• Origin of \hbar, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Origin of \hbar, torre
• Softening water gadget, Bossavit
  • Re: Softening water gadget, Helmut Wabnig
  • Re: Softening water gadget, Uncle Al
    • Re: Softening water gadget, Paul Danaher
    • Re: Softening water gadget, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
  • Re: Softening water gadget, Sue...
  • Re: Softening water gadget, Richard Saam
  • Re: Softening water gadget, Paul Danaher
  • Re: Softening water gadget, Dave
• Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 258), Alexey Popov
• A question concerning Einsteins elevator., Andrew Harland
  • Re: A question concerning Einsteins elevator., Greg Hennessy
  • Re: A question concerning Einsteins elevator., Uncle Al
  • Re: A question concerning Einsteins elevator., Tom Roberts
• A paper by Lena Hau, Naomi S. Ginsberg and Sean R. Garner, RH Nigl / GH Diel
• Does motion affect the operation of clocks or not ?, Andrew Harland
  • Re: Does motion affect the operation of clocks or not ?, Oh No
  • Re: Does motion affect the operation of clocks or not ?, a student
    • Re: Does motion affect the operation of clocks or not ?, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Does motion affect the operation of clocks or not ?, Rich L.
  • Re: Does motion affect the operation of clocks or not ?, Thomas Smid
  • Re: Does motion affect the operation of clocks or not ?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Does motion affect the operation of clocks or not ?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Does motion affect the operation of clocks or not ?, Sue...
    • Re: Does motion affect the operation of clocks or not ?, Uncle Al
      • Re: Does motion affect the operation of clocks or not ?, Sue...
• so, is it really true that observing dark energy hastens the end of the Universe?, robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: so, is it really true that observing dark energy hastens the end of the Universe?, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
  • Re: so, is it really true that observing dark energy hastens the end of the Universe?, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
  • Re: so, is it really true that observing dark energy hastens the end of the Universe?, ebunn
    • Re: so, is it really true that observing dark energy hastens the end of the Universe?, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
    • Re: so, is it really true that observing dark energy hastens the end of the Universe?, ebunn
    • Re: so, is it really true that observing dark energy hastens the end of the Universe?, ebunn
• How unlike real elevator (Rindler field) is field from planar mass?, Neil Bates
• Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", Juan R.
  • Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", Neil Bates
    • Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", Uncle Al
  • Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", Doug Sweetser
    • Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", Juan R.
• Re: dirac equation in curved spacetime, mihai cartoaje
• Ir sensor, gondiet98
  • Re: Ir sensor, Uncle Al
    • Re: Ir sensor, Dave
  • Re: Ir sensor, castanalysis
  • Re: Ir sensor, Ian Parker
• theme for a research work, rocket007
  • Re: theme for a research work, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: theme for a research work, Uncle Al
    • Re: theme for a research work, Uncle Al
  • Re: theme for a research work, kushal
• Fun with physics - new edition for free download, Christoph Schiller
  • Re: Fun with physics - new edition for free download, maxwell
• A paper by Garrett Lisi that John Beaz will enjoy, Edward C. Jones
  • Re: A paper by Garrett Lisi that John Beaz will enjoy, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
  • Re: A paper by Garrett Lisi that John Beaz will enjoy, Bryan Bishop
• No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?, Toon Moene
  • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?, B.Adams
  • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?, Doug Sweetser
  • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?, Thomas Smid
    • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?, Thomas Smid
    • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?, robert bristow-johnson
      • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?, Thomas Smid
      • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?, Roman Werpachowski
      • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything", Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything", Roman Werpachowski
      • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything", Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
      • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything", Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything", Roman Werpachowski
      • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything", Andreas Most
      • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything", Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
      • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything", Roman Werpachowski
      • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything", Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything", Roman Werpachowski
      • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything", CarlB
      • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything", ebunn
      • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything", Roman Werpachowski
      • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
  • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?, Calvin D. Ritchie
• point charge problem, ANS
  • Re: point charge problem, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: point charge problem, maxwell
• 28 qbit quantum computer, Ian Parker
• Group theory riddle, Doug Sweetser
  • Re: Group theory riddle, Andreas Most
    • Re: Group theory riddle, Doug Sweetser
      • Re: Group theory riddle, shalayka
    • Re: Group theory riddle, pellis
      • Re: Group theory riddle, Andreas Most
      • Re: Group theory riddle, pellis
  • Re: Group theory riddle, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Group theory riddle, Dan Espen
  • Re: Group theory riddle, Yuancur
  • Re: Group theory riddle, Doug Sweetser
    • Re: Group theory riddle, Yuancur
      • Re: Group theory riddle, Doug Sweetser
  • Re: Group theory riddle, a student
  • Re: Group theory riddle, Oh No
• About the validity of Einstein's 1905 Principle of Relativity, valls
• Electromagnetic hormonics, stengela
  • Re: Electromagnetic hormonics, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Electromagnetic hormonics, J. J. Lodder
  • Re: Electromagnetic hormonics, Helmut Wabnig
    • Re: Electromagnetic hormonics, J. J. Lodder
• Noncommutative geometry and the standard model, Edward C. Jones
  • Re: Noncommutative geometry and the standard model, arivero@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Noncommutative geometry and the standard model, Igor Khavkine
• General Covariance, Hayssam
  • Re: General Covariance, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: General Covariance, Hayssam
      • Re: General Covariance, Oh No
      • Re: General Covariance, Tom Roberts
      • Re: General Covariance, Oh No
      • Re: General Covariance, torre
      • Re: General Covariance, Oh No
      • Re: General Covariance, Stephen Blake
      • Re: General Covariance, Oh No
      • Re: General Covariance, Peter
  • Re: General Covariance, Uncle Al
  • Re: General Covariance, Tom Roberts
    • Re: General Covariance, Richard Saam
    • Re: General Covariance, jacques
    • Re: General Covariance, noshellswill
  • Re: General Covariance, Doug Sweetser
  • Re: General Covariance, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: General Covariance, torre
• Re: QG/QM without spacetime, Igor Khavkine
• YBCO Normal conductivity, Efthimios
• Max voltage safe for all electronic devices?, Green Xenon [Radium]
  • Re: Max voltage safe for all electronic devices?, Tom Roberts
• Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces, Rock Brentwood
  • Re: Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces, harry
  • Re: Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces, Doug Sweetser
    • Re: Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces, Oz
      • Re: Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces, Doug Sweetser
      • Re: Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces, harry
    • Re: Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces, Doug Sweetser
      • Re: Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces, harry
  • Re: Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces, Uncle Al
    • Re: Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces, Peter
• Modified GM probe counts solar UV photons?, billb
• Bohr-Sommerfeld Quantization question, Igor
  • Re: Bohr-Sommerfeld Quantization question, John Park
  • Re: Bohr-Sommerfeld Quantization question, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Bohr-Sommerfeld Quantization question, Igor
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Bohr-Sommerfeld Quantization question, Igor
• Does Higgs interaction cause decoherence?, eastmond
  • Re: Does Higgs interaction cause decoherence?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Does Higgs interaction cause decoherence?, eastmond
      • Re: Does Higgs interaction cause decoherence?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Does Higgs interaction cause decoherence?, noshellswill
      • Re: Does Higgs interaction cause decoherence?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Does Higgs interaction cause decoherence?, eastmond
• Re: Gravity on a torus, pirillo
  • Re: Gravity on a torus, Igor Khavkine
• Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?, Juan R.
  • Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?, Igor Khavkine
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?, Juan R.
    • Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?, Igor Khavkine
• Thermal imager versus foil, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
  • Re: Thermal imager versus foil, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
    • Re: Thermal imager versus foil, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
      • Re: Thermal imager versus foil, billb
      • Re: Thermal imager versus foil, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
  • Re: Thermal imager versus foil, Dave
  • Re: Thermal imager versus foil, Andy Resnick
• Dark Energy and MOND, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
  • Re: Dark Energy and MOND, Uncle Al
    • Re: Dark Energy and MOND, Juan R.
      • Re: Dark Energy and MOND, Eric Gisse
      • Re: Dark Energy and MOND, Juan R.
  • Re: Dark Energy and MOND, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
    • Re: Dark Energy and MOND, Martin Ouwehand
    • Re: Dark Energy and MOND, ebunn
      • Re: Dark Energy and MOND, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
  • Re: Dark Energy and MOND, Neil Bates
• Fun with vector coupling, Doug Sweetser
• Re: Dark Matter = discrete acceleration spectrum?, Igor Khavkine
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Dark Matter = discrete acceleration spectrum?, Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]
• Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, kvblake
  • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, Rich L.
    • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, kvblake
      • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, Rich L.
      • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, kvblake
      • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, Rich L.
      • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, kvblake
      • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, Rich L.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, Richard Saam
    • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, kvblake
• Re: EMF Shielding, Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Double counting gravitational potential energy, Jonathan Scott
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Double counting gravitational potential energy, Gerry Quinn
    • "spacetime really is flat and gravity is a force" ?? (was: Re: Double counting gravitational potential energy), Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]
      • Re: "spacetime really is flat and gravity is a force" ?? (was: Re: Double counting gravitational potential energy), Juan R.
      • Re: "spacetime really is flat and gravity is a force" ?? (was: Re: Double counting gravitational potential energy), Gerry Quinn
      • Re: "spacetime really is flat and gravity is a force" ??, Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]
      • Re: "spacetime really is flat and gravity is a force" ??, Gerry Quinn
• Re: Goldstone modes in statistical mechanics, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Goldstone modes in statistical mechanics, beheiger
    • Re: Goldstone modes in statistical mechanics, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Goldstone modes in statistical mechanics, beheiger
• Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
  • Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?, Andreas Most
    • Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?, PostReplies
      • Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?, Andreas Most
      • Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?, scerir
      • Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?, Andreas Most
      • Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?, scerir
      • Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?, Andreas Most
      • Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?, scerir
      • Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?, PostReplies
      • Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?, Andreas Most
      • Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?, PostReplies
      • Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?, Andreas Most
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?, Gerry Quinn
      • Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?, Gerry Quinn
      • Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?, scerir
  • Re: Has FTL communication really never been tested in this way?, Gerry Quinn

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint