Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?
- From: Thomas Smid <thomas.smid@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:42:08 +0000 (UTC)
On 20 Nov, 07:06, robert bristow-johnson <r...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
WOW! i surely do not get the philosophy (of science) behind this
statement. now, admittedly, i don't know squat about this paper, nor
the quality or veracity of the mathematics or science behind it. and
with the Bogdanov debaclehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bogdanov_Affair
, i realize that pseudo-scientific crap can be hidden behind
"mathematical mysticism". but i cannot understand the sentiment
behind this objection if the theory seems to have some empirical
support ("appears to reproduce certain aspects of reality").
I gave above the example of Kepler's polyhedron (polygon) scheme for
the planetary orbits (http://hyperion.cc.uregina.ca/~astro/
Kepler_poly.html ) to illustrate my point. As is evident from Table 2
on this page, this scheme also fits the observations quite well (apart
from being kind of 'beautiful' due to the symmetries involved), but it
is really not more than a mathematical ad-hoc representation of the
observations, not a physical explanation.
Thomas
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?
- From: Roman Werpachowski
- Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?
- References:
- No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?
- From: Toon Moene
- Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?
- From: Thomas Smid
- Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?
- From: robert bristow-johnson
- No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?
- Prev by Date: Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?
- Next by Date: Re: Ir sensor
- Previous by thread: Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?
- Next by thread: Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|