Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything"
- From: helbig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply)
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:49:49 +0000 (UTC)
In article <474A9E27.5050000@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Arnold Neumaier
<Arnold.Neumaier@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Are they 100% correct? ;-)But it was not 100% correct. There are relativistic corrections...
Modern quantum electrodynamics is, as far as we know, completely
correct.
Not quite. At sufficiently high order, the nucleus can no longer be
regarded as a point particle, and corrections from the form factor
of the proton (for hydrogen) must be taken into account.
OK, but there is no puzzle here. It is clear why the corrections are
needed. Presumably, though in practice it would be more difficult, one
could treat the constituents of the nucleus as point particles and
calculate the result exactly. There is no indication that the theory
itself breaks down. (At some level, gravity will enter the picture, but
that is a really low-level effect.)
.
- References:
- No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?
- From: Toon Moene
- Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?
- From: Thomas Smid
- Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?
- From: robert bristow-johnson
- Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?
- From: Thomas Smid
- Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?
- From: Roman Werpachowski
- Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything"
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything"
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Does motion affect the operation of clocks or not ?
- Next by Date: Re: so, is it really true that observing dark energy hastens the end of the Universe?
- Previous by thread: Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything"
- Next by thread: Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything"
- Index(es):