Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything"
- From: Roman Werpachowski <roman.werpachowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:30:16 +0000 (UTC)
Użytkownik ebunn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx napisał:
I certainly don't know the details of how all this works, but as I
understand it the number of terms at which things start to go bad is
pretty large in QED calculations, and the accuracy you can get to
before you run into trouble is much better than the 12 decimal places
we're talking about here.
It certainly makes QED a successful theory, but does not give it a higher status than the Balmer formula's.
--
"It should be noted that no ethically-trained software engineer would ever consent to write a DestroyBaghdad procedure. Basic professional ethics would instead require him to write a DestroyCity procedure, to which Baghdad could be given as a parameter." - Nathaniel Borenstein
.
- References:
- No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?
- From: Toon Moene
- Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything"
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything"
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything"
- From: Roman Werpachowski
- Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything"
- From: ebunn
- No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Softening water gadget
- Next by Date: Re: Softening water gadget
- Previous by thread: Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything"
- Next by thread: Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything" ?
- Index(es):