sci.physics.research

• Date Index

• Call for Papers: The 2008 International Conference on Scientific Computing (CSC'08), USA, July 2008, A. M. G. Solo
• FerroFluid Paper, michaelsnyder
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • FerroFluid Paper, michaelsnyder
• Is neutron-neutron fusion easier to facilitate than proton-proton, Green Xenon [Radium]
  • Re: Is neutron-neutron fusion easier to facilitate than proton-proton, Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]
• phase and conservation of charge in QM, 0o . M42 . o0
  • Re: phase and conservation of charge in QM, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: phase and conservation of charge in QM, roland franzius
  • Re: phase and conservation of charge in QM, Pierre Asselin
• Mass Spectrum in Regge Theory, John Eristu
• In the spirit of Xmas..., pellis
  • Re: In the spirit of Xmas..., Tom Roberts
• Re: QG/QM without spacetime, Surfer
• Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page, Tom Roberts
• Eigenstates of interacting and non-interacting Hamiltonian, Quantum_Devil
  • Re: Eigenstates of interacting and non-interacting Hamiltonian, Igor Khavkine
• Do loop corrections and string corrections to the black hole entropy agree?, yyoon
• Tensor Derivatives, peedah
• dark matter as inverted(relative or region of universe) arrow of, crowlogic
  • Re: dark matter as inverted(relative or region of universe) arrow of, Uncle Al
    • Re: dark matter as inverted(relative or region of universe) arrow, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
• Black Hole Entropy calculation by Loop Quantum Gravity, yyoon
  • Re: Black Hole Entropy calculation by Loop Quantum Gravity, youngsuby
• Re: Klein's Quartic Equation, Gerard Westendorp
• test---ignore, helbig
• Is the metric still symmetric in Einstein-Cartan theory?, Rock Brentwood
• Parity Calorimetry Experiment, III, Uncle Al
• Do gamma rays leave "partice" tracks?, billb
  • Re: Do gamma rays leave "partice" tracks?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Do gamma rays leave "partice" tracks?, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Do gamma rays leave "partice" tracks?, Oh No
  • Message not available
    • Re: Do gamma rays leave "partice" tracks?, billb
      • Re: Do gamma rays leave "partice" tracks?, Dan Riley
      • Re: Do gamma rays leave "partice" tracks?, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Do gamma rays leave "partice" tracks?, Richard Saam
• EM field of photon, ilper
  • Re: EM field of photon, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: EM field of photon, p . kinsler
    • Re: EM field of photon, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: EM field of photon, Timo A. Nieminen
    • Re: EM field of photon, Oz
  • Re: EM field of photon, boson boss
  • Re: EM field of photon, Thomas Smid
    • Re: EM field of photon, boson boss
  • Re: EM field of photon, CarlB
• operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar, mingyuming
  • Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar, thomas_larsson_01
  • Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar, a student
    • Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar, Stephen Parrott
      • Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar, a student
  • Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar, Stephen Parrott
  • Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar, Juan R. González-Álvarez
    • Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar, Juan R. González-Álvarez
  • Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar, mingyuming
    • Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar, a student
    • Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar, ebunn
    • Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar, Stephen Parrott
  • Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar, mingyuming
  • Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar, mingyuming
    • Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar, a student
  • Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar, p . kinsler
    • Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar, Igor Khavkine
• Hamiltonian for damped harmonic oscillator, a student
  • Re: Hamiltonian for damped harmonic oscillator, Chris H. Fleming
• Question about Everett's Quantum Theory, jonesrob
  • Re: Question about Everett's Quantum Theory, Chris H. Fleming
    • Re: Question about Everett's Quantum Theory, jonesrob
      • Re: Question about Everett's Quantum Theory, ebunn
      • Re: Question about Everett's Quantum Theory, Chris H. Fleming
• Electric pulse attenuation, Efthimios
  • Re: Electric pulse attenuation, Rich L.
    • Re: Electric pulse attenuation, Efthimios
      • Re: Electric pulse attenuation, Jim Black
      • Re: Electric pulse attenuation, Rich L.
    • Re: Electric pulse attenuation, William R. Frensley
      • Re: Electric pulse attenuation, Rich L.
      • distribution of leading digits of numbers (was: Re: Electric pulse attenuation), Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]
      • Re: Electric pulse attenuation, J. J. Lodder
  • Re: Electric pulse attenuation, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
  • Re: Electric pulse attenuation, jwill@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Cleaner quantum gravitation?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Cleaner quantum gravitation?, Fall
  • Re: Cleaner quantum gravitation?, kT
  • Re: Cleaner quantum gravitation?, Hontas F. Farmer
• Re: theme for a research work, J
• A Stringy Nature Needs Just Two Constants, arivero@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: A Stringy Nature Needs Just Two Constants, robert bristow-johnson
    • Re: A Stringy Nature Needs Just Two Constants, Matej Pavsic
    • Re: A Stringy Nature Needs Just Two Constants, John C. Polasek
      • Re: A Stringy Nature Needs Just Two Constants, robert bristow-johnson
• Spin-Statistics, S.M
  • Re: Spin-Statistics, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Spin-Statistics, Marvin
      • Re: Spin-Statistics, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Spin-Statistics, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Spin-Statistics, S.M
• Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, kvblake
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, DRLunsford
    • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, CarlB
      • Message not available
      • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, Oh No
      • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, Oz
    • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, ilper
    • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, Juan R. González-Álvarez
  • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, ilper
    • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, DRLunsford
      • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, Oh No
      • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, DRLunsford
  • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, Rich L.
    • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, Oz
  • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, DRLunsford
  • Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter, DRLunsford
• Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?, juanREMOVE-THIS
  • Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?, Chris H. Fleming
    • Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?, Martin Ouwehand
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?, torre
  • Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?, Juan R.
• Re: Gravity on a torus, pirillo
  • Re: Gravity on a torus, Igor Khavkine
• Projective Bundles and Geometric Equivalence Principle (was: Baez's Week 250...), Rock Brentwood
  • Re: Projective Bundles and Geometric Equivalence Principle (was: Baez's Week 250...), harry
• Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything", Arnold Neumaier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything", Arnold Neumaier
• Going around a circle (QM), pirillo
• Re: Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces, Gerard Westendorp
  • Re: Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces, Gerry Quinn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces, Uncle Al
  • Re: Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces, Rock Brentwood
• Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", Doug Sweetser
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", maxwell
    • Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", Doug Sweetser
      • Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", maxwell
  • Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", Doug Sweetser
    • Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", Gerry Quinn
      • Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", Doug Sweetser
      • Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", Gerry Quinn
  • Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", Surfer
  • Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", Doug Sweetser
    • Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", Gerry Quinn
      • Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", Gerry Quinn
  • Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", Rock Brentwood
  • Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", Doug Sweetser
  • Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", juanREMOVE-THIS
    • Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", Surfer
    • Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", Doug Sweetser
      • Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", Gerry Quinn
  • Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?", Doug Sweetser
• Re: Softening water gadget, Knud Soerensen
  • Re: Softening water gadget, Oz
    • Re: Softening water gadget, Knud Soerensen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Softening water gadget, Gerard Westendorp
  • Re: Softening water gadget, Uncle Al
    • Re: Softening water gadget, J. J. Lodder
• Re: Origin of \hbar, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Origin of \hbar, Raymond Manzoni
  • Re: Origin of \hbar, Martin Ouwehand
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Origin of \hbar, V
    • Re: Origin of \hbar, maxwell
    • Re: Origin of \hbar, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Origin of \hbar, pellis
      • Re: Origin of \hbar, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Origin of \hbar, Richard Saam
      • Re: Origin of \hbar, V
      • Re: Origin of \hbar, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Origin of \hbar, Jim Heckman
    • Re: Origin of \hbar, Raymond Manzoni
    • Re: Origin of \hbar, William R. Frensley
    • Re: Origin of \hbar, J. J. Lodder
  • Re: Origin of \hbar, Jon Lester
    • Re: Origin of \hbar, John C. Polasek
  • Re: Origin of \hbar, pellis
  • Re: Origin of \hbar, pellis
    • Re: Origin of \hbar, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Origin of \hbar, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Origin of \hbar, robert bristow-johnson

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint