sci.physics.research

• Thread Index

---

• Re: phase and conservation of charge in QM
  • From: roland franzius
• Re: Is neutron-neutron fusion easier to facilitate than proton-proton
  • From: Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]
• Re: dark matter as inverted(relative or region of universe) arrow
  • From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
• Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
  • From: Doug Sweetser
• Re: phase and conservation of charge in QM
  • From: Pierre Asselin
• Re: phase and conservation of charge in QM
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: In the spirit of Xmas...
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Call for Papers: The 2008 International Conference on Scientific Computing (CSC'08), USA, July 2008
  • From: A. M. G. Solo
• FerroFluid Paper
  • From: michaelsnyder
• FerroFluid Paper
  • From: michaelsnyder
• Is neutron-neutron fusion easier to facilitate than proton-proton
  • From: Green Xenon [Radium]
• phase and conservation of charge in QM
  • From: 0o . M42 . o0
• Re: Eigenstates of interacting and non-interacting Hamiltonian
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Mass Spectrum in Regge Theory
  • From: John Eristu
• In the spirit of Xmas...
  • From: pellis
• Re: QG/QM without spacetime
  • From: Surfer
• Update to the SR Experimental FAQ page
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: EM field of photon
  • From: Oz
• Eigenstates of interacting and non-interacting Hamiltonian
  • From: Quantum_Devil
• Do loop corrections and string corrections to the black hole entropy agree?
  • From: yyoon
• Re: EM field of photon
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Black Hole Entropy calculation by Loop Quantum Gravity
  • From: youngsuby
• Re: EM field of photon
  • From: CarlB
• Re: dark matter as inverted(relative or region of universe) arrow of
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: EM field of photon
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
  • From: Gerry Quinn
• Re: EM field of photon
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Tensor Derivatives
  • From: peedah
• Re: EM field of photon
  • From: boson boss
• dark matter as inverted(relative or region of universe) arrow of
  • From: crowlogic
• Re: EM field of photon
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: EM field of photon
  • From: p . kinsler
• Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter
  • From: Oz
• Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter
  • From: Oz
• Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
  • From: Doug Sweetser
• Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
  • From: Surfer
• Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar
  • From: p . kinsler
• Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
  • From: juanREMOVE-THIS
• Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter
  • From: Oh No
• Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter
  • From: DRLunsford
• Re: Do gamma rays leave "partice" tracks?
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter
  • From: DRLunsford
• Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter
  • From: Rich L.
• Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter
  • From: Juan R. González-Álvarez
• Re: Projective Bundles and Geometric Equivalence Principle (was: Baez's Week 250...)
  • From: harry
• Black Hole Entropy calculation by Loop Quantum Gravity
  • From: yyoon
• Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter
  • From: ilper
• Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
  • From: Gerry Quinn
• Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar
  • From: a student
• Re: Do gamma rays leave "partice" tracks?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Do gamma rays leave "partice" tracks?
  • From: Dan Riley
• Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter
  • From: DRLunsford
• Re: Do gamma rays leave "partice" tracks?
  • From: billb
• Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
  • From: Gerry Quinn
• Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter
  • From: CarlB
• Re: A Stringy Nature Needs Just Two Constants
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar
  • From: a student
• Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Do gamma rays leave "partice" tracks?
  • From: Oh No
• Re: Klein's Quartic Equation
  • From: Gerard Westendorp
• Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
  • From: Doug Sweetser
• Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter
  • From: DRLunsford
• Re: A Stringy Nature Needs Just Two Constants
  • From: John C. Polasek
• Re: Do gamma rays leave "partice" tracks?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Do gamma rays leave "partice" tracks?
  • From: Uncle Al
• test---ignore
  • From: helbig
• Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar
  • From: mingyuming
• Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar
  • From: mingyuming
• Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Is the metric still symmetric in Einstein-Cartan theory?
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar
  • From: Stephen Parrott
• Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar
  • From: ebunn
• Re: EM field of photon
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
  • From: Doug Sweetser
• Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar
  • From: Stephen Parrott
• Parity Calorimetry Experiment, III
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter
  • From: ilper
• Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar
  • From: a student
• Do gamma rays leave "partice" tracks?
  • From: billb
• Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar
  • From: mingyuming
• Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar
  • From: Juan R. González-Álvarez
• Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
  • From: Gerry Quinn
• Re: Electric pulse attenuation
  • From: Rich L.
• Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar
  • From: Juan R. González-Álvarez
• Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar
  • From: Stephen Parrott
• Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar
  • From: a student
• Re: Electric pulse attenuation
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter
  • From: DRLunsford
• Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
  • From: Surfer
• Re: Electric pulse attenuation
  • From: jwill@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
  • From: Doug Sweetser
• Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar
  • From: thomas_larsson_01
• EM field of photon
  • From: ilper
• operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar
  • From: mingyuming
• Re: Question about Everett's Quantum Theory
  • From: Chris H. Fleming
• Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
  • From: Gerry Quinn
• distribution of leading digits of numbers (was: Re: Electric pulse attenuation)
  • From: Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]
• Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Cleaner quantum gravitation?
  • From: Hontas F. Farmer
• Re: Electric pulse attenuation
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Hamiltonian for damped harmonic oscillator
  • From: Chris H. Fleming
• Re: Cleaner quantum gravitation?
  • From: kT
• Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?
  • From: Martin Ouwehand
• Re: Cleaner quantum gravitation?
  • From: Fall
• Re: Electric pulse attenuation
  • From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
• Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
  • From: Doug Sweetser
• Re: Electric pulse attenuation
  • From: Rich L.
• Re: Question about Everett's Quantum Theory
  • From: ebunn
• Hamiltonian for damped harmonic oscillator
  • From: a student
• Re: Question about Everett's Quantum Theory
  • From: jonesrob
• Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?
  • From: torre
• Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?
  • From: Chris H. Fleming
• Re: Question about Everett's Quantum Theory
  • From: Chris H. Fleming
• Re: Electric pulse attenuation
  • From: William R. Frensley
• Re: Electric pulse attenuation
  • From: Efthimios
• Re: Electric pulse attenuation
  • From: Rich L.
• Re: A Stringy Nature Needs Just Two Constants
  • From: Matej Pavsic
• Re: Spin-Statistics
  • From: S.M
• Re: Origin of \hbar
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Question about Everett's Quantum Theory
  • From: jonesrob
• Electric pulse attenuation
  • From: Efthimios
• Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Spin-Statistics
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Cleaner quantum gravitation?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Spin-Statistics
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Spin-Statistics
  • From: Marvin
• Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Origin of \hbar
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Spin-Statistics
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Origin of \hbar
  • From: Jim Heckman
• Re: Gravity on a torus
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Origin of \hbar
  • From: Igor Khavkine
• Re: Origin of \hbar
  • From: Martin Ouwehand
• Re: theme for a research work
  • From: J
• Re: Origin of \hbar
  • From: John C. Polasek
• Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
  • From: Doug Sweetser
• Re: A Stringy Nature Needs Just Two Constants
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Origin of \hbar
  • From: robert bristow-johnson
• Re: Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Origin of \hbar
  • From: pellis
• A Stringy Nature Needs Just Two Constants
  • From: arivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Origin of \hbar
  • From: pellis
• Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything"
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Softening water gadget
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Spin-Statistics
  • From: S.M
• Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter
  • From: kvblake
• Re: Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Origin of \hbar
  • From: V
• Re: Origin of \hbar
  • From: Richard Saam
• Re: Exact solution of 2-body problem in GR?
  • From: juanREMOVE-THIS
• Re: Origin of \hbar
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces
  • From: Gerry Quinn
• Re: Softening water gadget
  • From: Knud Soerensen
• Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Origin of \hbar
  • From: Jon Lester
• Re: Origin of \hbar
  • From: J. J. Lodder
• Re: Origin of \hbar
  • From: William R. Frensley
• Re: Softening water gadget
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity on a torus
  • From: pirillo
• Re: Origin of \hbar
  • From: Raymond Manzoni
• Re: Origin of \hbar
  • From: Raymond Manzoni
• Projective Bundles and Geometric Equivalence Principle (was: Baez's Week 250...)
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Origin of \hbar
  • From: pellis
• Re: Origin of \hbar
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: No comments on "An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything"
  • From: Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Origin of \hbar
  • From: maxwell
• Re: Softening water gadget
  • From: Oz
• Going around a circle (QM)
  • From: pirillo
• Re: Baez's Week 250, The Meaning of Relativity and Affine Spaces
  • From: Gerard Westendorp
• Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
  • From: Doug Sweetser
• Re: Origin of \hbar
  • From: V
• Re: Softening water gadget
  • From: Gerard Westendorp
• Re: Softening water gadget
  • From: Knud Soerensen
• Re: Origin of \hbar
  • From: Igor Khavkine

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(14)