Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
- From: Gerry Quinn <gerryq@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 11:27:25 -0500 (EST)
In article <MPG.21ce52d2d17c620798be2f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
gerryq@xxxxxxxxx says...
And yet if you take the real numbers modulo a constant, and use the
addition operator [rather than the multiplicative operator used on
complex numbers with a norm of 1, which seems to be the usual example
used to describe U(1)] - you have U(1) all over again.
More exactly, a group isomorphic to U(1). It probably has a name, but
I couldn't find it with Google.
- Gerry Quinn
.
- References:
- Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
- From: Doug Sweetser
- Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
- From: Gerry Quinn
- Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
- Prev by Date: Re: operator satisfying relations [H,T] = i hbar
- Next by Date: Re: On the uncertainty principle for photons. An experimental counter
- Previous by thread: Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
- Next by thread: Re: Open poll on "What changes for special and general relativity?"
- Index(es):