Re: QM Measurement Problem
- From: "Salviati" <eckard.blumschein@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:57:24 +0000 (UTC)
"Martin Hogbin" <goatREMOVETHIS123@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote ..
"Doug Sweetser" <dougsweetser@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:b9a6e7f5-61d2-4cc7-aef5-b68154ba7fbf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The uncertainty principle arises from the properties of complex
numbers, which unlike the real numbers, is not a totally ordered set.
What about the possiblity to attribute the idea of having two totally
ordered sets at a time on a simple real-valued pair of conjugate exclusively
positive quantities x and y=1/x ? Let be F(x) the cosine transform of f(y).
.
- References:
- QM Measurement Problem
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: QM Measurement Problem
- From: Doug Sweetser
- Re: QM Measurement Problem
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: QM Measurement Problem
- From: Doug Sweetser
- Re: QM Measurement Problem
- From: Martin Hogbin
- QM Measurement Problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Hawton Position Operator. (Was: EM field of photon)
- Next by Date: Re: QM Measurement Problem
- Previous by thread: Re: QM Measurement Problem
- Next by thread: Re: QM Measurement Problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|