Questions about Path Intergral for Lagrangian Density = 0



I have a question: Consider the path integral:

Z = DA exp[-iS(A)] = C exp [iW(J)]

where S(A) = $d^4x L.

Above, the field variable is A, the source of the field is J, the
amplitude is W(J), the action is S(A), the Lagrangian density is L, and
C is an overall product factor independent of J and often containing a
product of inverse determinants.

Let's posit that L=0, everywhere. We take that as a supposition.
Perhaps 0 = some other expression involving the sources and fields, but
nonetheless, this expression L is always = 0.

Would the following deductions be true / permissible?

1) S(A) = 0, because the integral over a volume of anything which is
zero, is itself zero. No constants of integration come into play. For
example, thinking about Maxwell's equations in integral form, if there
is a three volume within which the charge is zero everywhere, then the
total enclosed charge is zero.

if 1) is true, then:

2) Z = DA, because exp[-iS(A)] = 1

if 2) is true, then:

3) given Z=DA, we can select C such that DA = C. Then, exp [iW(J)] =1.

if 3) is true, then

4) W(J) = 2pi n and so is quantized.

Please evaluate and advise if there is any flaw in this logic.

Thanks,

Jay.
____________________________
Jay R. Yablon
Email: jyablon@xxxxxxxxxxxx
co-moderator: sci.physics.foundations
Weblog: http://jayryablon.wordpress.com/
Web Site: http://home.nycap.rr.com/jry/FermionMass.htm


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: This is What Einstein Actually Did.
    ... |>|>| during this race is zero, ... |>|>velocity, you stupid cunt, and the velocity is zero. ... |>We know that already, neither does Phuckwit Duck. ... you'll never understand integration. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: How to get probability of chi-sqares distribution?
    ... func = @chi2pdf; ... I think that in the latter case, the integration range is bigger than ... When you give such a large range as 0 to 1514, 'quad' ... it finds is that all the values are zero or almost zero, ...
    (comp.soft-sys.matlab)
  • Re: calculous in the curve space theorem 3
    ... and that's zero, not 1, over any finite interval of integration. ... Of course your whole notion of infinitesimals seems to be very half- ... What about case when dx and sindx like a function cannot expres ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Questions about Path Intergral for Lagrangian Density = 0
    ... Would the following deductions be true / permissible? ... zero, is itself zero. ... No constants of integration come into play. ... total enclosed charge is zero. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity.
    ... >>The integral of zero is zero no matter how you slice it. ... > What's your constant of integration? ... >>would be an elastic collision with an object having a known mass ... are dealing with non-interacting particles. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)