Re: Query about spin and uncertainty
- From: "Jay R. Yablon" <jyablon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:46:08 -0400 (EDT)
"Igor" <thoovler@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:946f3358-f8e0-4e3f-b336-1276c4821920@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.. . .
Usually, (1) is shown to be a consequence of (2). However, you should
be able to derive (2) from (1) by applying the definitions of the
angular momentum components in terms of the rectangular coordinates
x_i and linear momentum components p_j, together with the well-based
assumptions that [x_i,x_k] = 0 and [p_j,p_k] = 0. Using the rules for
commutators, you should be left with [x_j,p_k] = i hbar delta_j_k.
I have carried out a derivation along the lines that Igor lays out,
which is linked in the two-page pdf file below.
http://jayryablon.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/spin-to-uncertainty.pdf
Does this look about right?
Thanks,
Jay.
.
- References:
- Query about spin and uncertainty
- From: Jay R. Yablon
- Re: Query about spin and uncertainty
- From: Igor
- Query about spin and uncertainty
- Prev by Date: Re: Query about spin and uncertainty
- Next by Date: Re: general relativity website
- Previous by thread: Re: Query about spin and uncertainty
- Next by thread: Re: Query about spin and uncertainty
- Index(es):