Re: Is Cross Product AxB always equal to -BXA? Even if A and B are non-commuting?
- From: "Jay R. Yablon" <jyablon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:44:26 +0000 (UTC)
"Jay R. Yablon" <jyablon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:66o1o3F2l7e3mU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Quick question:I think I answered my own question, and the answer is:
For two commuting three-vectors A and B, the cross product
AxB = -BxA.
But what if A and B are non-commuting. Say they are the spin oprator
S
and the angular momentum operator L.
Might it be that LxS <> -SxL in this case?
Or, would the related commutators:
[L,S]+[S,L]=0
cause us to have LxS = -SxL here as well?
Thanks.
Jay.
____________________________
Jay R. Yablon
Email: jyablon@xxxxxxxxxxxx
co-moderator: sci.physics.foundations
Weblog: http://jayryablon.wordpress.com/
Web Site: http://home.nycap.rr.com/jry/FermionMass.htm
AxB = -BxA, always.
See
http://jayryablon.wordpress.com/files/2008/04/intrinsic-spin-decomposition.pdf,
which will explain the context in which I raised this question, because
of the canonical commutation relationship
[x,p]=i hbar Kronecker-delta
which does not permit commutation between co-aligned x, p.
Jay.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is Cross Product AxB always equal to -BXA? Even if A and B are non-commuting?
- From: Rock Brentwood
- Re: Is Cross Product AxB always equal to -BXA? Even if A and B are non-commuting?
- From: Aage Andersen
- Re: Is Cross Product AxB always equal to -BXA? Even if A and B are non-commuting?
- References:
- Is Cross Product AxB always equal to -BXA? Even if A and B are non-commuting?
- From: Jay R. Yablon
- Is Cross Product AxB always equal to -BXA? Even if A and B are non-commuting?
- Prev by Date: Re: Query about intrinsic verus orbital angular momentum
- Next by Date: Any good physics softwares?
- Previous by thread: Is Cross Product AxB always equal to -BXA? Even if A and B are non-commuting?
- Next by thread: Re: Is Cross Product AxB always equal to -BXA? Even if A and B are non-commuting?
- Index(es):