Re: The Foldy-Wouthuysen Velocity Operator -- Is this Correct?
- From: Arnold Neumaier <Arnold.Neumaier@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:10:55 +0000 (UTC)
Jay R. Yablon schrieb:
There has been a fair amount of discussion on sci.physics.foundations in
the thread "Might Foldy-Wouthuysen Transformations contain a Hidden
Fermion Mass Generation Mechanism?" regarding the fact that the velocity
operator "alpha" of the Dirac Hamiltonian appears to suggest that a
fermion must travel at the speed of light, which some describe as making
"no sense."
While I had earlier thought that this might be the seat of a
mass-generation mechanism, I do not at this juncture believe that is the
case. In particular, as shown below, all rest masses cancel, and the
velocity then becomes amenable to distinct treatment independent of rest
mass.
In the 3-page file linked below, I have shown how this velocity operator
is (I think??) transformed into the Newton-Wigner representation using
the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation, and how in that latter
representation, that velocity operator comes to make perfect sense.
For this connection, see the entry
S2h. Localization and position operators
in my theoretical physics FAQ at
http://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~neum/physics-faq.txt
For related information, see also
S2g. Particle positions and the position operato
Arnold Neumaier
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Foldy-Wouthuysen Velocity Operator -- Is this Correct?
- From: Jay R. Yablon
- Re: The Foldy-Wouthuysen Velocity Operator -- Is this Correct?
- References:
- The Foldy-Wouthuysen Velocity Operator -- Is this Correct?
- From: Jay R. Yablon
- The Foldy-Wouthuysen Velocity Operator -- Is this Correct?
- Prev by Date: Re: single photon through glass
- Next by Date: Re: Seeing fluid on the surface of your eye - how does this work?
- Previous by thread: The Foldy-Wouthuysen Velocity Operator -- Is this Correct?
- Next by thread: Re: The Foldy-Wouthuysen Velocity Operator -- Is this Correct?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|