sci.physics.research

• Date Index

---

• A Systems Theoretical Formal Logic for Category Theory, C Pedro
• Re: The Diosi Interpretation of (Classico-)Quantum Theory, of_1001_nights
• Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes, Melroy
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes, Gerry Quinn
• Questions regarding "second quantization," Yang-Mills, and QCD confinement, Jay R. Yablon
• Where is the sign error in this differential forms calculation?, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Where is the sign error in this differential forms calculation?, Hendrik van Hees
    • Re: Where is the sign error in this differential forms calculation?, Jay R. Yablon
• Assignment of tensors of certain orders to physical quantities, PuZHANG0702@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Assignment of tensors of certain orders to physical quantities, Hendrik van Hees
    • Re: Assignment of tensors of certain orders to physical quantities, Juan R.
  • Re: Assignment of tensors of certain orders to physical quantities, John Polasek
    • Re: Assignment of tensors of certain orders to physical quantities, PuZHANG0702@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Assignment of tensors of certain orders to physical quantities, vps137
    • Re: Assignment of tensors of certain orders to physical quantities, PuZHANG0702@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Assignment of tensors of certain orders to physical quantities, vps137
  • Re: Assignment of tensors of certain orders to physical quantities, PuZHANG0702@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Assignment of tensors of certain orders to physical quantities, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Assignment of tensors of certain orders to physical quantities, John Polasek
  • Re: Assignment of tensors of certain orders to physical quantities, Bossavit
  • Message not available
    • Re: Assignment of tensors of certain orders to physical quantities, Rock Brentwood
• Questions about degrees of freedom in classical electrodynamics, Jay R. Yablon
• Extended draft paper submission: TACS-09 call for papers, devipsrs@xxxxxxxxx
• Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?, dudajar
  • Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?, Ian Parker
    • Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
      • Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?, Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?, Melroy
• Flatness & Newtonian Gravity, John (Liberty) Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)
  • Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity, Juan R. González-Álvarez
  • Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity, carlip-nospam
  • Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity, 1000K
  • Message not available
    • Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity, John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity, John Polasek
• Lorentz-Invariant Formulation of Maxwell's Equations in Integral Form -- Does this Look Correct?, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Lorentz-Invariant Formulation of Maxwell's Equations in Integral Form -- Does this Look Correct?, Jay R. Yablon
• Why can we be sure that gravitational waves completely don't interact, dudajar
  • Re: Why can we be sure that gravitational waves completely don't interact, Igor Khavkine
• SI - CGS Rosetta Stone for charge(e), Richard D. Saam
• Question about probability distributions with canonical quantization, Jay R. Yablon
• Question on isotope stability, TheoreticalPhysics
• Question about probability distributions with canical quantization, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Question about probability distributions with canical quantization, johnhudson20032003
    • Re: Question about probability distributions with canical, of_1001_nights
  • Re: Question about probability distributions with canical quantization, Gerard Westendorp
  • Re: Question about probability distributions with canical quantization, p . kinsler
  • Re: Question about probability distributions with canical, Lester Welch
• Would spatial symmetry affect biochemistry?, dudajar
  • Re: Would spatial symmetry affect biochemistry?, Hans Aberg
    • Re: Would spatial symmetry affect biochemistry?, dudajar
      • Re: Would spatial symmetry affect biochemistry?, Hans Aberg
    • Re: Would spatial symmetry affect biochemistry?, Ian Parker
      • Re: Would spatial symmetry affect biochemistry?, pellis
  • Message not available
    • Re: Would spatial symmetry affect biochemistry?, dudajar
      • Re: Would spatial symmetry affect biochemistry?, Juan R.
      • Re: Would spatial symmetry affect biochemistry?, dudajar
      • Re: Would spatial symmetry affect biochemistry?, Uncle Al
      • Re: Would spatial symmetry affect biochemistry?, Gerard Westendorp
      • Re: Would spatial symmetry affect biochemistry?, pellis
      • Re: Would spatial symmetry affect biochemistry?, Uncle Al
      • Re: Would spatial symmetry affect biochemistry?, pellis
      • Message not available
      • Re: Would spatial symmetry affect biochemistry?, Uncle Al
• What is the standard deviation of polarised light, John Hudson
• limit on electron - positon charge difference, fringuello giulivo
  • Re: limit on electron - positon charge difference, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: limit on electron - positon charge difference, Lester Welch
    • Re: limit on electron - positon charge difference, Lester Welch
  • Re: limit on electron - positon charge difference, Bob_for_short
• Superforce by Paul Davies Question(s), forex10
• Re: What MEDIUM does LIGHT REQUIRE?, Rock Brentwood
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What MEDIUM does LIGHT REQUIRE?, Rock Brentwood
    • Re: What MEDIUM does LIGHT REQUIRE?, jwill@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Has One Circularly Polarized Photon an Angle of Orientation?, Darwin123
  • Re: Has One Circularly Polarized Photon an Angle of Orientation?, Ian Parker
  • Re: Has One Circularly Polarized Photon an Angle of Orientation?, Neil B.
• On the surface of a sphere..., The Dougster
  • Re: On the surface of a sphere..., Gerard Westendorp
• Hawking Radiation, WG
  • Re: Hawking Radiation, Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
    • Re: Hawking Radiation, WG
      • Re: Hawking Radiation, Hendrik van Hees
  • Re: Hawking Radiation, Neil B.
  • Message not available
    • Re: Hawking Radiation, dudajar
  • Re: Hawking Radiation, John (Liberty) Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)
• extra dimensions lead to confinement, arivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Ask for help, about the "Krieger's theorem", MogeiWang
  • Re: Ask for help, about the "Krieger's theorem", of_1001_nights
• Gamma matrices and SU(4), Lester Welch
  • Re: Gamma matrices and SU(4), Igor Khavkine
  • Dirac, gamma5 and SO(4,1) (was: Gamma matrices and SU(4)), Rock Brentwood
• Questions about Casimir effect, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Questions about Casimir effect, Richard D. Saam
  • Re: Questions about Casimir effect, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Questions about Casimir effect, Darwin123
• Galilean Limit of EM Done Right (i.e. correcting Levy & Leblond's mistake), Rock Brentwood
• Looking for research adviser in the Chicago area. (Theoretical physics), Hontas Farmer
  • Re: Looking for research adviser in the Chicago area. (Theoretical physics), Hontas Farmer
• WPI EUROPE Grenoble Metallic glass, li.yan.mse@xxxxxxxxx
• What happens to Faraday's Magnetic Charge Equation dF=0, in Quantum Theory?, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: What happens to Faraday's Magnetic Charge Equation dF=0, in Quantum Theory?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: What happens to Faraday's Magnetic Charge Equation dF=0, in Quantum Theory?, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: What happens to Faraday's Magnetic Charge Equation dF=0, in Quantum Theory?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: What happens to Faraday's Magnetic Charge Equation dF=0, in Quantum Theory?, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: What happens to Faraday's Magnetic Charge Equation dF=0, in Quantum Theory?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: What happens to Faraday's Magnetic Charge Equation dF=0, in Quantum Theory?, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: What happens to Faraday's Magnetic Charge Equation dF=0, in Quantum Theory?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: What happens to Faraday's Magnetic Charge Equation dF=0, in Quantum Theory?, Jay R. Yablon
• Neutral Pion to Electron Positron Pair, geo
  • Re: Neutral Pion to Electron Positron Pair, nmajik
  • Re: Neutral Pion to Electron Positron Pair, Uncle Al
    • Re: Neutral Pion to Electron Positron Pair, Patrick Nolan
      • Re: Neutral Pion to Electron Positron Pair, geo
      • Re: Neutral Pion to Electron Positron Pair, Patrick Nolan
      • Re: Neutral Pion to Electron Positron Pair, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Neutral Pion to Electron Positron Pair, Patrick Nolan
• moderator's note: non-ASCII characters, Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]
• gas ionization time, mk5778
  • Message not available
    • Re: gas ionization time, Murray Arnow
      • Re: gas ionization time, JaUran
  • Re: gas ionization time, John Polasek
• moderator's note: apology for delayed postings, Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]
• Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, David Rutherford
  • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, Daryl McCullough
    • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, David Rutherford
      • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, David Rutherford
      • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, David Rutherford
      • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, David Rutherford
      • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, David Rutherford
      • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, heinera
      • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, David Rutherford
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)
      • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)
      • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, Daryl McCullough
      • Message not available
      • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, David Rutherford
      • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, heinera
      • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)
    • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, Daryl McCullough
  • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, David Rutherford
    • Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question, Daryl McCullough
• Question abut the QFT Applicability of Maxwell / Faraday's Integral Equations, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Question abut the QFT Applicability of Maxwell / Faraday's Integral Equations, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Question abut the QFT Applicability of Maxwell / Faraday's Integral Equations, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Question abut the QFT Applicability of Maxwell / Faraday's Integral Equations, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: Question abut the QFT Applicability of Maxwell / Faraday's, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Question abut the QFT Applicability of Maxwell / Faraday's Integral Equations, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: Question abut the QFT Applicability of Maxwell / Faraday's Integral Equations, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Question abut the QFT Applicability of Maxwell / Faraday's Integral Equations, Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Lagrangian of Leggett's sketch of an effective interaction, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Lagrangian of Leggett's sketch of an effective interaction, FPL
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Lagrangian of Leggett's sketch of an effective interaction, Igor Khavkine
• Re: Simple(st) chaotic system, Nicolaas Vroom
  • Re: Simple(st) chaotic system, Gerard Westendorp
    • Re: Simple(st) chaotic system, Nicolaas Vroom
      • Re: Simple(st) chaotic system, Gerard Westendorp
• Question about the dynamical evolution of a classical universe., intuitionist1
• Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, gemruinskeeper
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, johnhudson20032003
  • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, johnhudson20032003
    • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, of_1001_nights
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, johnhudson20032003
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, of_1001_nights
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, johnhudson20032003
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, johnhudson20032003
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, Uncle Al
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, johnhudson20032003
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, Hendrik van Hees
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, johnhudson20032003
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, of_1001_nights
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, Ilja Schmelzer
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, of_1001_nights
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, johnhudson20032003
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, of_1001_nights
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, johnhudson20032003
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, johnhudson20032003
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, scerir
    • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, johnhudson20032003
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, johnhudson20032003
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, johnhudson20032003
      • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, johnhudson20032003
  • Re: Faster than light signalling via an EPR type mechanism, Surfer
• Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, Knecht
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, Nicolaas Vroom
      • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, dudajar
      • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, Gerard Westendorp
      • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, Robert L. Oldershaw
      • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Message not available
      • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, Hendrik van Hees
      • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, Gerard Westendorp
      • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, Hendrik van Hees
      • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, dudajar
      • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, slawomir . duda
      • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, dudajar
      • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, dudajar
      • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, dudajar
      • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, Gerard Westendorp
      • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?, maxwell
• Re: On the Incompleteness of Relativization, Phil
• Re: Has one linear polarized photon a spin?, CarlBrannen
  • Re: Has one linear polarized photon a spin?, whit3rd
  • Re: Has one linear polarized photon a spin?, Darwin123
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Has one linear polarized photon a spin?, Darwin123
• Re: Need Help With c-Invariance, John Polasek
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Need Help With c-Invariance, robert bristow-johnson
  • Re: Need Help With c-Invariance, John Polasek
• Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, John Polasek
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, Richard D. Saam
    • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, Hans Aberg
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, Richard D. Saam
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, Hans Aberg
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, Richard D. Saam
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, Hans Aberg
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, Richard D. Saam
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, J. J. Lodder
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, Richard D. Saam
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, robert bristow-johnson
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, Richard D. Saam
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, Hans Aberg
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, robert bristow-johnson
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, Hans Aberg
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, robert bristow-johnson
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, Hans Aberg
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, robert bristow-johnson
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, Hans Aberg
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, robert bristow-johnson
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, Hans Aberg
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, Dr J R Stockton
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, John Polasek
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, J. J. Lodder
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, John Polasek
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, John Polasek
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, John Polasek
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, Albert van der Horst
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, Hans Aberg
  • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, John Polasek
    • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, robert bristow-johnson
      • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, John Polasek
  • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, Gerard Westendorp
    • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, John Polasek
    • Re: Are dimensions any use in an MKSA-only context?, Richard D. Saam

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

sci.tech-archive.net  > Archive  > sci.physics.research  > 2009-04