Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?
- From: Knecht <rloldershaw@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:54:43 EDT
[[Mod. note -- By the time it reached my moderation mailbox, this
posting had various non-ASCII characters garbled. :( -- jt]]
On Apr 1, 10:54M-BM- am, Igor Khavkine <igor...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
QED and QFT in general is no more and no less deterministic than QM of
particles.
See http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20127011.600-can-fractals-make-sense-of-the-quantum-world.html?full=true
for an extremely interesting and provocative discussion of T.N.
Palmer's remarkable new ideas regarding a possible deterministic
underpinning for Quantum Mechanics. Physics is clearly not "finished".
Knecht
.
- References:
- Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?
- From: Igor Khavkine
- Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?
- Prev by Date: gas ionization time
- Next by Date: moderator's note: non-ASCII characters
- Previous by thread: Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?
- Next by thread: Re: Why field theories are deterministic, but QM isn't?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
