# sci.physics.research

**Explaining Schroedinger's equation**,*Oh No***How do we measure and experience time? And, how does this differ from how we measure and experience space?**,*Jay R. Yablon***Paradox of applied electromagnetic forces and work in relativity**,*Neil B.***General Coordinate Invariance**,*Jay R. Yablon***CFP: Optical SuperComputing Workshop 2009**,*optical supercomputing***Re: physical meaning of entropy**,*Arnold Neumaier***Let's Please Explore "Energy-Time Uncertainty" in Depth**,*Jay R. Yablon***Re: Let's Please Explore "Energy-Time Uncertainty" in Depth**,*Jay R. Yablon***Re: Let's Please Explore "Energy-Time Uncertainty" in Depth**,*Stephen Parrott***Re: Let's Please Explore "Energy-Time Uncertainty" in Depth**,*Rock Brentwood*

**Re: On the Incompleteness of Relativization**,*Rock Brentwood*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: On the Incompleteness of Relativization**,*Rock Brentwood*

**Call for Papers with Deadline of May 27, 2009: WORLDCOMP'09 (joint conferences in comp. sci., comp. eng., and applied computing), USA, July 13-16, 2009**,*A. M. G. Solo***An alternative to the Hirsch index**,*Zurab Silagadze***Re: An alternative to the Hirsch index**,*Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply***Re: An alternative to the Hirsch index**,*Arnold Neumaier***Re: An alternative to the Hirsch index**,*Zurab Silagadze***Re: An alternative to the Hirsch index**,*p . kinsler*

**Re: gas ionization time**,*whit3rd***Renormalization is Classical (was: Renormalizations demystified)**,*Rock Brentwood***Maxwell Views on Relative vs. Absolute Motion & Maxwell's Medium**,*Rock Brentwood***Spin Networks and Chern-Simons theory?**,*Blake Winter***Is this device physically-possible to build?**,*GreenXenon***Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a low-mass approximation?**,*Jay R. Yablon***Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a low-mass approximation?**,*Hendrik van Hees***Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a**,*juanREMOVE***Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a**,*Arnold Neumaier***Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a**,*Juan R.***Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a**,*Arnold Neumaier***Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a**,*ultraman2002***Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a**,*Arnold Neumaier***Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a**,*Hendrik van Hees***Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a**,*Arnold Neumaier***Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a**,*Hendrik van Hees***Photon position observable (was: Re: Is the canonical commutation...)**,*Marc Nardmann***Re: Photon position observable**,*Hendrik van Hees*

**Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a low-mass approximation?**,*Arnold Neumaier*

**journal of chaos, solitons and fractals**,*a student***Re: journal of chaos, solitons and fractals**,*Juan R.***Re: journal of chaos, solitons and fractals**,*Benjamin Schulz*

**What is the most direct route from Planck's Law to the Canonical Commutation Relationship?**,*Jay R. Yablon***Resubmittal: One-way Invariance Is Physically Impossible**,*Kurt Kingston***Re: Renormalizations demystified**,*Igor Khavkine***Re: Renormalizations demystified**,*Juan R. González-Álvarez***Re: Renormalizations demystified**,*Igor Khavkine***Re: Renormalizations demystified**,*Juan R.*

**Re: Renormalizations demystified**,*Bob_for_short***Re: Renormalizations demystified**,*Igor Khavkine***Re: Renormalizations demystified**,*Bob_for_short***Re: Renormalizations demystified**,*Bob_for_short***Re: Renormalizations demystified**,*Bob_for_short*

**Re: Renormalizations demystified**,*Gerald Knizia***Re: Renormalizations demystified**,*Igor Khavkine***Re: Renormalizations demystified**,*Bob_for_short***Re: Renormalizations demystified**,*Igor Khavkine***Re: Renormalizations demystified**,*Bob_for_short*

**Re: A Systems Theoretical Formal Logic for Category Theory**,*Bob_for_short***Re: Questions regarding "second quantization," Yang-Mills, and QCD confinement**,*Rock Brentwood***The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway & Kochen)**,*cfstrom***Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &**,*Ilja Schmelzer***Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &**,*cfstrom***Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &**,*Ilja Schmelzer***Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &**,*cfstrom***Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &**,*cfstrom***Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &**,*Arnold Neumaier***Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &**,*Hendrik van Hees***Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &**,*Arnold Neumaier***Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &**,*Hendrik van Hees***Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &**,*Ilja Schmelzer***Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &**,*Ilja Schmelzer***Re: Reality in Bohmian quantum mechnaics**,*Arnold Neumaier***Re: Reality in Bohmian quantum mechnaics**,*Ilja Schmelzer**Message not available***Re: Reality in Bohmian quantum mechnaics**,*Hendrik van Hees***Re: Reality in Bohmian quantum mechnaics**,*Ilja Schmelzer***Re: Reality in Bohmian quantum mechnaics**,*Hendrik van Hees***Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &**,*Ilja Schmelzer***Reality in Bohmian quantum mechnaics**,*Arnold Neumaier***Re: Reality in Bohmian quantum mechnaics**,*Ilja Schmelzer***Re: Reality in Bohmian quantum mechnaics**,*Arnold Neumaier***Re: Reality in Bohmian quantum mechnaics**,*Ilja Schmelzer***Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &**,*of_1001_nights***Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &**,*Ilja Schmelzer*

**Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway & Kochen)**,*Oh No***Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway & Kochen)**,*Michael Helland*

**interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration hyperbolas**,*Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]***Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration hyperbolas**,*Bob_for_short***Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration hyperbolas**,*Gerry Quinn***Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration hyperbolas**,*Bob_for_short***Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration hyperbolas**,*Gerry Quinn***Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration**,*Bob_for_short***Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration hyperbolas**,*John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)*

**Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration**,*John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)***Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration**,*John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)*

**Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration**,*John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)***Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration**,*John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)***Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration**,*John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)*

**Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration**,*John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)***Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration**,*John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)***Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration**,*Daryl McCullough***Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration**,*John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)*

**Re: Questions regarding "second quantization," Yang-Mills, and QCD**,*Rock Brentwood***Re: Need Help With c-Invariance**,*Rock Brentwood***Re: What MEDIUM does LIGHT REQUIRE?**,*Rock Brentwood***nice articles (online, open-access!) about redefining the kilogram**,*Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]***What is a Medium? Toward a General Theory of Media**,*Rock Brentwood***Re: The Diosi Interpretation of (Classico-)Quantum Theory**,*Rock Brentwood***Re: The Diosi Interpretation of (Classico-)Quantum Theory**,*of_1001_nights*

**"Electric Limit" = "Magnetic Limit" (was: Galilean Limit of EM Done Right)**,*Rock Brentwood***Errante's capacitive RF earth grounding system. Disclosed!**,*www.Margherita-Caminita.com***Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?**,*prashanth*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?**,*Ian Parker***Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?**,*Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]***Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?**,*Richard D. Saam***Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?**,*Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]*

**Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?**,*carlip-nospam*

**Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?**,*Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]***Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?**,*Igor Khavkine***Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?**,*Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]***Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?**,*Igor Khavkine***Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?**,*Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]*

**U(1), SU(2) and SU(3) in three space dimensions**,*franca . jonesclerici***Re: U(1), SU(2) and SU(3) in three space dimensions**,*franca . jonesclerici***Re: U(1), SU(2) and SU(3) in three space dimensions**,*heinera***Re: U(1), SU(2) and SU(3) in three space dimensions**,*franca . jonesclerici***Re: U(1), SU(2) and SU(3) in three space dimensions**,*Heinz***Re: U(1), SU(2) and SU(3) in three space dimensions**,*Ilja Schmelzer***Re: U(1), SU(2) and SU(3) in three space dimensions**,*franca . jonesclerici***Re: U(1), SU(2) and SU(3) in three space dimensions**,*Hans Aberg*

**Re: U(1), SU(2) and SU(3) in three space dimensions**,*Heinz*

**Re: Let's Study Ehrenfest's Theorem and the Heisenberg Equation of Motion**,*Hendrik van Hees***Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question**,*Tom Roberts*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question**,*David Rutherford***Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question**,*Daryl McCullough*

**Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question**,*Tom Roberts***Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question**,*jwill@xxxxxxxxxxxx*

**Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question**,*David Rutherford***Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question**,*Tom Roberts*

**Question about Poincare but not general invariance of spacetime coordinates and Fourier kernels**,*Jay R. Yablon***Re: Let's Study Ehrenfest's Theorem and the Heisenberg Equation of**,*Igor Khavkine***Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity**,*John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity**,*Rock Brentwood***Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity**,*of_1001_nights***Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity**,*harry***Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity**,*Juan R.***Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity**,*Rock Brentwood***Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity**,*Juan R.***Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity**,*harry***Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity**,*Juan R.**Message not available***Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity**,*harry**Message not available***Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity**,*harry**Message not available***Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity**,*harry***Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity**,*Rock Brentwood***Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity**,*Juan R.***Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity**,*Juan R.*

**Re: What if the second law stops existing?**,*J. J. Lodder***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Eric Gisse*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Igor Khavkine***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Gerry Quinn***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Juan R. González-Álvarez***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Eric Gisse***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*juanREMOVE***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Eric Gisse***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Juan R.***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Eric Gisse***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Juan R.***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*juanREMOVE***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Eric Gisse***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Juan R.***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Eric Gisse***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Eric Gisse***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Juan R.***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Eric Gisse***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Juan R.***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Eric Gisse***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Juan R.***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*juanREMOVE***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Juan R.***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Eric Gisse***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*juanREMOVE***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Eric Gisse***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*juanREMOVE***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Tom Roberts***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Gerry Quinn***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Igor Khavkine***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Bob_for_short***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Gerry Quinn***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Igor Khavkine***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Gerry Quinn***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*CarlBrannen***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Gerry Quinn***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*CarlBrannen***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Gerry Quinn***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Juan R.***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Juan R. González-Álvarez***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Gerry Quinn***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Eric Gisse*

**Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*CarlBrannen***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Igor Khavkine***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*CarlBrannen***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Juan R. González-Álvarez***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Eric Gisse***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Juan R.***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Eric Gisse***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*juanREMOVE***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Eric Gisse***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Juan R. González-Álvarez***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Eric Gisse***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*juanREMOVE*

**Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Juan R.*

**Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*jacques***Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes**,*Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]*