sci.physics.research
- Explaining Schroedinger's equation
- From: Oh No
- Re: Photon position observable
- From: Hendrik van Hees
- Re: Let's Please Explore "Energy-Time Uncertainty" in Depth
- From: Rock Brentwood
- Re: Let's Please Explore "Energy-Time Uncertainty" in Depth
- From: Richard D. Saam
- How do we measure and experience time? And, how does this differ from how we measure and experience space?
- From: Jay R. Yablon
- Re: Paradox of applied electromagnetic forces and work in relativity
- From: Neil B.
- Photon position observable (was: Re: Is the canonical commutation...)
- From: Marc Nardmann
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a
- From: Hendrik van Hees
- Re: Let's Please Explore "Energy-Time Uncertainty" in Depth
- From: Chalky
- Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: juanREMOVE
- Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a
- From: Hendrik van Hees
- Paradox of applied electromagnetic forces and work in relativity
- From: Neil B.
- Re: Let's Please Explore "Energy-Time Uncertainty" in Depth
- From: Chalky
- Re: Let's Please Explore "Energy-Time Uncertainty" in Depth
- From: Chalky
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Let's Please Explore "Energy-Time Uncertainty" in Depth
- From: Jay R. Yablon
- Re: Let's Please Explore "Energy-Time Uncertainty" in Depth
- From: Stephen Parrott
- Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway & Kochen)
- From: Michael Helland
- Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: Let's Please Explore "Energy-Time Uncertainty" in Depth
- From: heinera
- Re: Let's Please Explore "Energy-Time Uncertainty" in Depth
- From: of_1001_nights
- General Coordinate Invariance
- From: Jay R. Yablon
- Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity
- From: harry
- Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity
- From: harry
- Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity
- From: harry
- Re: An alternative to the Hirsch index
- From: p . kinsler
- Re: Let's Please Explore "Energy-Time Uncertainty" in Depth
- From: Stephen Parrott
- CFP: Optical SuperComputing Workshop 2009
- From: optical supercomputing
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Let's Please Explore "Energy-Time Uncertainty" in Depth
- From: Chalky
- Re: physical meaning of entropy
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: On the Incompleteness of Relativization
- From: Rock Brentwood
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Let's Please Explore "Energy-Time Uncertainty" in Depth
- From: Jay R. Yablon
- Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: juanREMOVE
- Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a
- From: ultraman2002
- Re: An alternative to the Hirsch index
- From: Zurab Silagadze
- Re: Reality in Bohmian quantum mechnaics
- From: Hendrik van Hees
- Re: Reality in Bohmian quantum mechnaics
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- Let's Please Explore "Energy-Time Uncertainty" in Depth
- From: Jay R. Yablon
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity
- From: Rock Brentwood
- Re: On the Incompleteness of Relativization
- From: Rock Brentwood
- Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity
- From: harry
- Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: An alternative to the Hirsch index
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a low-massapproximation?
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a low-mass approximation?
- From: Jay R. Yablon
- Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Reality in Bohmian quantum mechnaics
- From: Hendrik van Hees
- Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &
- From: of_1001_nights
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Gerry Quinn
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: CarlBrannen
- Call for Papers with Deadline of May 27, 2009: WORLDCOMP'09 (joint conferences in comp. sci., comp. eng., and applied computing), USA, July 13-16, 2009
- From: A. M. G. Solo
- Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Juan R.
- Re: An alternative to the Hirsch index
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Gerry Quinn
- Re: Maxwell Views on Relative vs. Absolute Motion & Maxwell's Medium
- From: harry
- Re: journal of chaos, solitons and fractals
- From: Benjamin Schulz
- Re: Renormalizations demystified
- From: Bob_for_short
- Re: Reality in Bohmian quantum mechnaics
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- An alternative to the Hirsch index
- From: Zurab Silagadze
- Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: gas ionization time
- From: whit3rd
- Re: Reality in Bohmian quantum mechnaics
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- Renormalization is Classical (was: Renormalizations demystified)
- From: Rock Brentwood
- Maxwell Views on Relative vs. Absolute Motion & Maxwell's Medium
- From: Rock Brentwood
- Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a
- From: juanREMOVE
- Re: Reality in Bohmian quantum mechnaics
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: Renormalizations demystified
- From: Bob_for_short
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: CarlBrannen
- Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity
- From: Rock Brentwood
- Spin Networks and Chern-Simons theory?
- From: Blake Winter
- Re: Reality in Bohmian quantum mechnaics
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: Renormalizations demystified
- From: Bob_for_short
- Re: Reality in Bohmian quantum mechnaics
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Resubmittal: One-way Invariance Is Physically Impossible
- From: Igor Khavkine
- Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &
- From: Hendrik van Hees
- Reality in Bohmian quantum mechnaics
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Renormalizations demystified
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Renormalizations demystified
- From: Bob_for_short
- Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: U(1), SU(2) and SU(3) in three space dimensions
- From: Hans Aberg
- Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a low-mass approximation?
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration
- From: John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: juanREMOVE
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: juanREMOVE
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: juanREMOVE
- Re: Resubmittal: One-way Invariance Is Physically Impossible
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a low-mass approximation?
- From: Hendrik van Hees
- Re: Renormalizations demystified
- From: Igor Khavkine
- Re: Resubmittal: One-way Invariance Is Physically Impossible
- From: cfstrom
- Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: journal of chaos, solitons and fractals
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Juan R.
- Is this device physically-possible to build?
- From: GreenXenon
- Is the canonical commutation relationship really just a low-mass approximation?
- From: Jay R. Yablon
- Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &
- From: cfstrom
- Re: Renormalizations demystified
- From: Bob_for_short
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Gerry Quinn
- Re: Renormalizations demystified
- From: Igor Khavkine
- Re: Renormalizations demystified
- From: Igor Khavkine
- Re: Let's Study Ehrenfest's Theorem and the Heisenberg Equation of Motion
- From: Igor Khavkine
- Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &
- From: Hendrik van Hees
- journal of chaos, solitons and fractals
- From: a student
- Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration hyperbolas
- From: John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)
- Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration
- From: John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)
- Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- What is the most direct route from Planck's Law to the Canonical Commutation Relationship?
- From: Jay R. Yablon
- Re: Question about Poincare but not general invariance of spacetime coordinates and Fourier kernels
- From: Jay R. Yablon
- Re: Renormalizations demystified
- From: Igor Khavkine
- Re: Renormalizations demystified
- From: Gerald Knizia
- Re: Renormalizations demystified
- From: Bob_for_short
- Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration
- From: Bob_for_short
- Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &
- From: cfstrom
- Resubmittal: One-way Invariance Is Physically Impossible
- From: Kurt Kingston
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Juan R. González-Álvarez
- Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &
- From: Arnold Neumaier
- Re: U(1), SU(2) and SU(3) in three space dimensions
- From: franca . jonesclerici
- Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration
- From: John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)
- Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity
- From: Juan R.
- Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &
- From: cfstrom
- Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration
- From: John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Juan R. González-Álvarez
- Re: Renormalizations demystified
- From: Juan R. González-Álvarez
- Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration
- From: John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)
- Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Gerry Quinn
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: juanREMOVE
- Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration hyperbolas
- From: Gerry Quinn
- Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Renormalizations demystified
- From: Igor Khavkine
- Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration
- From: John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Juan R.
- Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway & Kochen)
- From: Oh No
- Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?
- From: carlip-nospam
- Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?
- From: Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]
- Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway & Kochen)
- From: cfstrom
- Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration
- From: John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)
- Re: A Systems Theoretical Formal Logic for Category Theory
- From: Bob_for_short
- Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &
- From: cfstrom
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway & Kochen)
- From: Oh No
- Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration hyperbolas
- From: Bob_for_short
- Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity
- From: harry
- Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration
- From: John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)
- Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration hyperbolas
- From: Gerry Quinn
- Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?
- From: Igor Khavkine
- Re: U(1), SU(2) and SU(3) in three space dimensions
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway &
- From: Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: U(1), SU(2) and SU(3) in three space dimensions
- From: Heinz
- Re: U(1), SU(2) and SU(3) in three space dimensions
- From: Heinz
- Re: Questions regarding "second quantization," Yang-Mills, and QCD confinement
- From: Rock Brentwood
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Igor Khavkine
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?
- From: Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]
- The first scientific proof of free will (based on Conway & Kochen)
- From: cfstrom
- Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?
- From: Richard D. Saam
- Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity
- From: of_1001_nights
- Re: interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration hyperbolas
- From: Bob_for_short
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: juanREMOVE
- interesting special-relativity effect: constant-acceleration hyperbolas
- From: Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]
- Re: Questions regarding "second quantization," Yang-Mills, and QCD
- From: Rock Brentwood
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity
- From: Rock Brentwood
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Gerry Quinn
- Re: The Diosi Interpretation of (Classico-)Quantum Theory
- From: of_1001_nights
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Gerry Quinn
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Juan R. González-Álvarez
- Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Need Help With c-Invariance
- From: Rock Brentwood
- Re: What MEDIUM does LIGHT REQUIRE?
- From: Rock Brentwood
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: jacques
- nice articles (online, open-access!) about redefining the kilogram
- From: Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: CarlBrannen
- What is a Medium? Toward a General Theory of Media
- From: Rock Brentwood
- Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?
- From: Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Bob_for_short
- Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question
- From: jwill@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: U(1), SU(2) and SU(3) in three space dimensions
- From: franca . jonesclerici
- Re: The Diosi Interpretation of (Classico-)Quantum Theory
- From: Rock Brentwood
- "Electric Limit" = "Magnetic Limit" (was: Galilean Limit of EM Done Right)
- From: Rock Brentwood
- Re: U(1), SU(2) and SU(3) in three space dimensions
- From: heinera
- Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?
- From: Igor Khavkine
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?
- From: Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]
- Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question
- From: David Rutherford
- Errante's capacitive RF earth grounding system. Disclosed!
- From: www.Margherita-Caminita.com
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
- Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Question about Poincare but not general invariance of spacetime
- From: Igor Khavkine
- Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?
- From: Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Igor Khavkine
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Igor Khavkine
- Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question
- From: David Rutherford
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Juan R. González-Álvarez
- Re: Let's Study Ehrenfest's Theorem and the Heisenberg Equation of Motion
- From: Jay R. Yablon
- Re: Question about Poincare but not general invariance of spacetime coordinates and Fourier kernels
- From: Jay R. Yablon
- Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: Is LIGO just observing viscosity of the vacuum?
- From: prashanth
- Re: U(1), SU(2) and SU(3) in three space dimensions
- From: franca . jonesclerici
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: CarlBrannen
- U(1), SU(2) and SU(3) in three space dimensions
- From: franca . jonesclerici
- Re: Let's Study Ehrenfest's Theorem and the Heisenberg Equation of Motion
- From: Hendrik van Hees
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Gerry Quinn
- Re: Accelerating rocket/light beam question
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Igor Khavkine
- Question about Poincare but not general invariance of spacetime coordinates and Fourier kernels
- From: Jay R. Yablon
- Re: Let's Study Ehrenfest's Theorem and the Heisenberg Equation of
- From: Igor Khavkine
- Re: Flatness & Newtonian Gravity
- From: John Bell (Change John to Liberty for email)
- Re: What if the second law stops existing?
- From: J. J. Lodder
- Re: Einstein's 1939 paper challenging the existence of black holes
- From: Eric Gisse
Loading
