sci.physics.research

• Date Index

---

• Electrons as quanta, Lester Welch
• On Pair Annihilation and Electromagnetic Field, Anamitra Palit
• feedback requested for www.sciencedump.com, Jur
• Virtual Photons and the Infinite Range of Electromagnetic Interaction, Anamitra Palit
  • Re: Virtual Photons and the Infinite Range of Electromagnetic, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Virtual Photons and the Infinite Range of Electromagnetic, Anamitra Palit
    • Re: Virtual Photons and the Infinite Range of Electromagnetic, Martin Saturka
  • Re: Virtual Photons and the Infinite Range of Electromagnetic Interaction, Oh No
  • Re: Virtual Photons and the Infinite Range of Electromagnetic Interaction, Bob_for_short
  • Re: Virtual Photons and the Infinite Range of Electromagnetic Interaction, Gerry Quinn
  • Re: Virtual Photons and the Infinite Range of Electromagnetic, Uncle Al
• Why does the renormalization group work?, Fizix 2009
  • Re: Why does the renormalization group work?, Arnold Neumaier
• spacetime curvature and Unruh's effect, Laconicus
  • Re: spacetime curvature and Unruh's effect, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: spacetime curvature and Unruh's effect, Laconicus
      • Re: spacetime curvature and Unruh's effect, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: spacetime curvature and Unruh's effect, Tom Roberts
• The Mathematical Substructure Underlying Quantum Field Theory, and Why I Like Anthony Zee's Book so Much, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: The Mathematical Substructure Underlying Quantum Field Theory,, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: The Mathematical Substructure Underlying Quantum Field Theory, and Why I Like Anthony Zee's Book so Much, Jay R. Yablon
    • Re: The Mathematical Substructure Underlying Quantum Field Theory,, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: The Mathematical Substructure Underlying Quantum Field Theory,, Jay R. Yablon
• Who said Work = F d and Kinetic energy KE = (1/2)mv^2?, Peter
  • Re: Who said Work = F d and Kinetic energy KE = (1/2)mv^2?, Richard D. Saam
• Charged or Neutral Strong Nuclear Force Exchanges?, Chalky
  • Re: Charged or Neutral Strong Nuclear Force Exchanges?, Phillip Helbig---undress to reply
    • Re: Charged or Neutral Strong Nuclear Force Exchanges?, Chalky
      • Re: Charged or Neutral Strong Nuclear Force Exchanges?, Phillip Helbig---undress to reply
      • Re: Charged or Neutral Strong Nuclear Force Exchanges?, Chalky
      • Re: Charged or Neutral Strong Nuclear Force Exchanges?, Phillip Helbig---undress to reply
  • Re: Charged or Neutral Strong Nuclear Force Exchanges?, Lester Welch
    • Re: Charged or Neutral Strong Nuclear Force Exchanges?, Chalky
      • Re: Charged or Neutral Strong Nuclear Force Exchanges?, Lester Welch
      • Re: Charged or Neutral Strong Nuclear Force Exchanges?, Chalky
      • Re: Charged or Neutral Strong Nuclear Force Exchanges?, Lester Welch
• M-theory on the sphere S2??, arivero@xxxxxxxxx
• Discussion of Horava-Lifshitz gravity?, Melroy
• Your thoughts on idea that may kill string theory., andyeverett
  • Re: Your thoughts on idea that may kill string theory., Robert L. Oldershaw
    • Re: Your thoughts on idea that may kill string theory., Hans-Peter Schmidt
      • Re: Your thoughts on idea that may kill string theory., Phillip Helbig---undress to reply
      • Re: Your thoughts on idea that may kill string theory., X-Phy
      • Re: Your thoughts on idea that may kill string theory., Phillip Helbig---undress to reply
      • Re: Your thoughts on idea that may kill string theory., X-Phy
      • Re: Your thoughts on idea that may kill string theory., Phillip Helbig---undress to reply
      • Re: Your thoughts on idea that may kill string theory., Gordon Stangler
      • Re: Your thoughts on idea that may kill string theory., Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
      • Re: Your thoughts on idea that may kill string theory., Robert L. Oldershaw
      • Re: Your thoughts on idea that may kill string theory., Gordon Stangler
      • Re: Your thoughts on idea that may kill string theory., Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]
      • Re: Your thoughts on idea that may kill string theory., JohnMS
      • Re: Your thoughts on idea that may kill string theory., eric gisse
      • Re: Your thoughts on idea that may kill string theory., Chalky
      • Re: Your thoughts on idea that may kill string theory., Phillip Helbig---undress to reply
    • Re: Your thoughts on idea that may kill string theory., andyeverett
  • Re: Your thoughts on idea that may kill string theory., FrediFizzx
    • Re: Your thoughts on idea that may kill string theory., Hans-Peter Schmidt
• Re: Looking for Fourier transform of x^-(n/m), where n,m are integers but n/m is not, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Looking for Fourier transform of x^-(n/m), where n,m are integers but n/m is not, Jay R. Yablon
    • Re: Looking for Fourier transform of x^-(n/m), where n,m are integers but n/m is not, Jay R. Yablon
    • Re: Looking for Fourier transform of x^-(n/m), where n,m are integers, Igor Khavkine
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Looking for Fourier transform of x^-(n/m), where n,m are integers but n/m is not, Peter
    • Re: Looking for Fourier transform of x^-(n/m), where n,m are integers but n/m is not, Jay R. Yablon
• relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, Ulf Klein
  • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, Peter
    • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, Gerry Quinn
  • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, Bob_for_short
  • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, a student
    • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, Peter
      • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, a student
      • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, Peter
    • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, Ulf Klein
      • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, p . kinsler
  • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, Phillip Helbig
  • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, Juan R.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, X-Phy
    • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, Ulf Klein
      • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, Bob_for_short
      • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, Ulf Klein
      • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, Bob_for_short
      • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, X-Phy
      • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, Lester Welch
      • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, p . kinsler
      • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, X-Phy
      • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, X-Phy
      • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, X-Phy
      • Re: relation between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics, Arnold Neumaier
• Planetary drift, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
  • Re: Planetary drift, Phillip Helbig---undress to reply
  • Re: Planetary drift, eric gisse
    • Re: Planetary drift, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
      • Re: Planetary drift, Tom Roberts
      • Re: Planetary drift, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
  • Re: Planetary drift, Robert L. Oldershaw
  • Re: Planetary drift, Nicolaas Vroom
• Double hole experiment, Sandcastle
• Re: Renormalization Grounded in Classical Field Theory -- Mass Shift vs., Peter
• Questions about the relationship between the metric tensor and the gravitational field, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Questions about the relationship between the metric tensor and the gravitational field, Juan R.
  • Re: Questions about the relationship between the metric tensor and the gravitational field, carlip-nospam
    • Re: Questions about the relationship between the metric tensor and the gravitational field, Jay R. Yablon
• Quantum Field Theory: The Big, Simple Picture?, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Quantum Field Theory: The Big, Simple Picture?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Quantum Field Theory: The Big, Simple Picture?, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: Quantum Field Theory: The Big, Simple Picture?, X-Phy
      • Re: Quantum Field Theory: The Big, Simple Picture?, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: Quantum Field Theory: The Big, Simple Picture?, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: Quantum Field Theory: The Big, Simple Picture?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Quantum Field Theory: The Big, Simple Picture?, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: Quantum Field Theory: The Big, Simple Picture?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Quantum Field Theory: The Big, Simple Picture?, Juan R.
      • Re: Quantum Field Theory: The Big, Simple Picture?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Quantum Field Theory: The Big, Simple Picture?, X-Phy
      • Re: Quantum Field Theory: The Big, Simple Picture?, Phillip Helbig---undress to reply
      • Re: Quantum Field Theory: The Big, Simple Picture?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Quantum Field Theory: The Big, Simple Picture?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Quantum Field Theory: The Big, Simple Picture?[repost], Gerard Westendorp
    • Re: Quantum Field Theory: The Big, Simple Picture?[repost], Jay R. Yablon
• Replica Limit vs. thermodynamic limit, beheiger
• Time arrow and causality, Peter
  • Re: Time arrow and causality, Uncle Al
    • Re: Time arrow and causality, Juan R. González-Álvarez
    • Re: Time arrow and causality, Peter
    • Re: Time arrow and causality, Gerry Quinn
  • Re: Time arrow and causality, Juan R. González-Álvarez
    • Re: Time arrow and causality, Peter
      • Re: Time arrow and causality, Juan R.
      • Re: Time arrow and causality, Robert L. Oldershaw
      • Re: Time arrow and causality, Juan R.
      • Re: Time arrow and causality, Robert L. Oldershaw
      • Re: Time arrow and causality, Daryl McCullough
  • Re: Time arrow and causality, Bob_for_short
    • Re: Time arrow and causality, Peter
  • Re: Time arrow and causality, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Time arrow and causality, Robert L. Oldershaw
      • Re: Time arrow and causality, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: Time arrow and causality, Juan R. González-Álvarez
      • Re: Time arrow and causality, Peter
    • Re: Time arrow and causality, Juan R.
      • Re: Time arrow and causality, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Time arrow and causality, Peter
    • Re: Time arrow and causality, p . kinsler
  • Re: Time arrow and causality, Robert L. Oldershaw
  • Re: Time arrow and causality, Lester Welch
  • Re: Time arrow and causality, Lester Welch
• Spasers for Solar Energy Intensification?, EdV
  • Re: Spasers for Solar Energy Intensification?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Spasers for Solar Energy Intensification?, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
  • Re: Spasers for Solar Energy Intensification?, X-Phy
• What would be the field element for Path Integation of the Einstein - Hilbert Action!, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: What would be the field element for Path Integation of the Einstein - Hilbert Action!, carlip-nospam
    • Re: What would be the field element for Path Integation of the Einstein - Hilbert Action!, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: What would be the field element for Path Integation of the Einstein - Hilbert Action?, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: What would be the field element for Path Integation of the, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: What would be the field element for Path Integation of the, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: What would be the field element for Path Integation of the Einstein - Hilbert Action!, Igor Khavkine
• Momentum Cut-Off vs Compactification (was:... Fourier ... Curved, Rock Brentwood
• Generalized Calculation of Path Integrals for Quadratic Form Actions: Some Questions, Jay R. Yablon
• TQC 2010: The 5th Conference on Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication, and Cryptography, simone severini
• Re: Looking for Feedback on an Exercise Calculating the QED Path Integral and Greens Fucntions in Curved Spacetime with Boundary Terms, Jay R. Yablon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Looking for Feedback on an Exercise Calculating the QED Path Integral and Greens Fucntions in Curved Spacetime with Boundary Terms, Rock Brentwood
    • Re: Looking for Feedback on an Exercise Calculating the QED Path Integral and Greens Fucntions in Curved Spacetime with Boundary Terms, Jay R. Yablon
• lab equipment to repeat classic QM experiments?, BW
  • Re: lab equipment to repeat classic QM experiments?, BW
  • Re: lab equipment to repeat classic QM experiments?, carlip-nospam
• Re: Looking for Feedback on an Exercise Calculating the QED Path, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Looking for Feedback on an Exercise Calculating the QED Path, Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Finitary Path Integrals, Causality & Curved Space-Time, Rock Brentwood
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Finitary Path Integrals, Causality & Curved Space-Time, Peter
• Re: What Happens to Fourier Transforms in Curved Spacetime?, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: What Happens to Fourier Transforms in Curved Spacetime?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: What Happens to Fourier Transforms in Curved Spacetime?, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: What Happens to Fourier Transforms in Curved Spacetime?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: What Happens to Fourier Transforms in Curved Spacetime?, Jay R. Yablon
    • Re: What Happens to Fourier Transforms in Curved Spacetime?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: What Happens to Fourier Transforms in Curved Spacetime?, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: What Happens to Fourier Transforms in Curved Spacetime?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: What Happens to Fourier Transforms in Curved Spacetime?, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: What Happens to Fourier Transforms in Curved Spacetime?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: What Happens to Fourier Transforms in Curved Spacetime?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: What Happens to Fourier Transforms in Curved Spacetime?, Jay R. Yablon
      • Re: What Happens to Fourier Transforms in Curved Spacetime?, X-Phy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What Happens to Fourier Transforms in Curved Spacetime?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: What Happens to Fourier Transforms in Curved Spacetime?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: What Happens to Fourier Transforms in Curved Spacetime?, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: What Happens to Fourier Transforms in Curved Spacetime?, Arnold Neumaier
• Re: Is Perfect Reversibility A Myth?, Robert L. Oldershaw
  • Re: Is Perfect Reversibility A Myth?, Tom Roberts
  • Re: Is Perfect Reversibility A Myth?, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Is Perfect Reversibility A Myth?, Richard D. Saam
    • Re: Is Perfect Reversibility A Myth?, Peter
    • Re: Is Perfect Reversibility A Myth?, Robert L. Oldershaw
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is Perfect Reversibility A Myth?, Arnold Neumaier
    • Re: Is Perfect Reversibility A Myth?, Juan R. González-Álvarez
    • Message not available
      • Re: Is Perfect Reversibility A Myth?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Is Perfect Reversibility A Myth?, Phillip Helbig
      • Re: Is Perfect Reversibility A Myth?, juanREMOVE
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is Perfect Reversibility A Myth?, Arnold Neumaier
  • Re: Is Perfect Reversibility A Myth?, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: Is Perfect Reversibility A Myth?, Juan R.
    • Re: Is Perfect Reversibility A Myth?, Robert L. Oldershaw
      • Re: Is Perfect Reversibility A Myth?, Arnold Neumaier
      • Re: Is Perfect Reversibility A Myth?, Robert L. Oldershaw
      • Re: Is Perfect Reversibility A Myth?, Uncle Al
• Re: Is magnetic flux quantified only in superconductors?, Hendrik van Hees
  • Re: Is magnetic flux quantified only in superconductors?, Jarek Duda

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

sci.tech-archive.net  > Archive  > sci.physics.research  > 2009-11