# sci.physics.research

**The Geometric Representations of the BLL Family of Symmetry Groups**,*Alfred Einstead***Interaction of Graphene with Light reading texts**,*shouvik . iitkgp***Dirac's paper on QM of Electron**,*Stephen Montgomery-Smith***Re: Dirac's paper on QM of Electron**,*Hendrik van Hees***Re: Dirac's paper on QM of Electron**,*Hendrik van Hees***Re: Dirac's paper on QM of Electron**,*jcordes***Re: Dirac's paper on QM of Electron**,*Stephen Montgomery-Smith***Re: Dirac's paper on QM of Electron**,*Roland Franzius***Re: Dirac's paper on QM of Electron**,*Vladimir Kalitvianski***Re: Dirac's paper on QM of Electron**,*Alfred Einstead***Re: Dirac's paper on QM of Electron**,*Alfred Einstead*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Dirac's paper on QM of Electron**,*Mike Fontenot*

**Re: GUT Paper accepted by Journal of Modern Physics**,*Alfred Einstead***Understanding Velocity - Time graphs**,*Ivana Minz***Re: Understanding Velocity - Time graphs**,*Mike Fontenot***Re: Understanding Velocity - Time graphs**,*Jos Bergervoet*

**My four recent peer-reviewed papers are now all published and online...**,*Jay R. Yablon***My four recent peer-reviewed papers are now all published and online...**,*mercury***Re: My four recent peer-reviewed papers are now all published and online...**,*jefferywinkler***My four recent peer-reviewed papers are now all published and online...**,*Jay R. Yablon***Re: My four recent peer-reviewed papers are now all published and online...**,*Jos Bergervoet***Re: My four recent peer-reviewed papers are now all published and online...**,*Jay R. Yablon***Re: My four recent peer-reviewed papers are now all published and**,*Jos Bergervoet***Re: My four recent peer-reviewed papers are now all published and**,*Jay R. Yablon*

**Re: My four recent peer-reviewed papers are now all published and**,*jefferywinkler*

**Re: Hi, How can I get started on reading research papers on mathematical**,*Alfred Einstead*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Hi, How can I get started on reading research papers on mathematical**,*Gregor Scholten*

**Re: SR & GR & "twin paradox"**,*Gregor Scholten***Re: SR & GR & "twin paradox"**,*Ken S. Tucker***Re: SR & GR & "twin paradox"**,*Tom Roberts***Re: SR & GR & "twin paradox"**,*Jos Bergervoet***Re: SR & GR & "twin paradox"**,*Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply]***Re: SR & GR & "twin paradox"**,*Tom Roberts*

**Re: SR & GR & "twin paradox"**,*Hendrik van Hees***Re: SR & GR & "twin paradox"**,*Ken S. Tucker***Re: SR & GR & "twin paradox"**,*Rich L.*

**Re: SR & GR & "twin paradox"**,*Gregor Scholten*

- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: SR & GR & "twin paradox"**,*Alfred Einstead***Re: SR & GR & "twin paradox"**,*Chalky*

**Re: Gravitational Slingshots**,*Richard D. Saam***Product rule for functional derivatives?**,*Gregor Scholten*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: Product rule for functional derivatives?**,*Alfred Einstead*

**Re: mass defect**,*Gerry Quinn*- <Possible follow-ups>
**Re: mass defect**,*Jay R. Yablon***Re: mass defect**,*mercury***Re: mass defect**,*Anon E. Mouse*