Re: Parallel universes proven by Quantum Computers

From: George Buyanovsky (buyanovsky_at_attbi.com)
Date: 06/02/04 

Date: 2 Jun 2004 11:36:19 -0700

wetrover@webtv.net (marsrules) wrote in message news:<a9cca4e5.0406012122.34e614bd@posting.google.com>...
> buyanovsky@attbi.com (George Buyanovsky) wrote in message news:<d7221cc2.0405141613.4b4c196d@posting.google.com>...
> > jha_amin@yahoo.com (jha_amin) wrote in message news:<33b7880.0405141017.79aab28f@posting.google.com>...
> >
> > > This is kind of cool:
> >
> > It is not "cool" it is sad ;~\
> >
> > George
>
> You are a worthless troll unable to understand these concepts because
> of your intense hatred of any idea you consider supernatural. Quantum
> Physics is fact. The multiverse and parallel realities are proven by
> quantum computation. This definition of reality is more consistent
> with science than your antiquated world view, troll.

Is the argument like "worthless troll" is a part of your polemical
skill? Probably it is just a bad manner.

Nevertheless I've been really fascinated by implications of multiverse
ideas since it looks (for me) very economic way to answer the most
basic questions about existence itself. We may look at existence
phenomena, as it is the direct implication of multiverse construct.
One of basics of existence is the following to a particular consistent
set of laws. Otherwise you would run into difficulty to establish
transitive relations between things (whatever it is). The particular
consistent set of laws is not defined by God but it is a result of
natural selection (see Smolin/Linde). The observer is the direct
consequence of this natural selection. The most intrigue part of this
picture is the role of observer awareness in forming of this set. The
natural selection of consistent set is the process where observer and
"reality" is mutually dependent. It means that observer is able to
affect (to chose) "reality" at extent it does not violate the
consistency of it. The trick is that consistency is a function of
awareness ;o)

The multiverse is not a sandwich of realities it is enormously vast
space of realities with unmapped trails of existence. I would say
axiomatic noise or superposition of all God's dreams ;o)

Best,
George

Relevant Pages

  • =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_Disorder:_=22fantasy-prone_personality=22?=
    ... You are aware that there are alternative approaches to simply repeating the ... Ones that account for and remove the biases of the observer? ... record consistent results. ... Evolution is an accepted concept not because Darwin meticulously recorded ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Do you understand Special Relativity?
    ... If one is proposing something different it is a good idea to clarify what it is which is different. ... 'consistent' is pretty much meaningless. ... The statement makes no mention of the observer ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Building a Light Clock
    ... >> composition with a velocity less than that of light. ... > to be c from any observer which happens to hit it. ... > All perfectly consistent, if very mind-bending. ... this change in distance has to be consistent. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Brand Name Club Manufacturing Cost
    ... consistent set of clubs with a ... consistent swing and you're bound to score well. ... Actually the KZG dealer plays the ZO blades. ... Maybe if I'm not playing as much I'd ...
    (rec.sport.golf)
  • Re: Fudge Factors and a new physics.
    ... measurable quantity in a consistent way for all spacetime intervals. ... In the frame of the barn observer A observes that rod has a real ... If a ship is viewed as 2 inches long from 2km away, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)