Re: Non-homogenous theories of space and time

From: Eric Gisse (fsegg_at_uaf.edu)
Date: 06/03/04 

Date: 2 Jun 2004 19:21:20 -0700

mhelland@techmocracy.net (Mike Helland) wrote in message news:<ad157aec.0406020622.aab8fb3@posting.google.com>...
> fsegg@uaf.edu (Eric Gisse) wrote in message news:<fd0fc2fa.0406011712.1e2e0fa7@posting.google.com>...
>
> > > Coming from someone that refuses to read my papers I highly doubt you
> > > understand the ideas you're criticizing. Feel free to convince me
> > > otherwise. I'll listen.
> >
> > Anything obtained from invoking ANGLES is garbage.
>
> The concepts put forward by my papers have proven to be difficult to
> understand without lighthearted explanations. Read the following paper
> if you want an analogy free version:
>
> http://www.techmocracy.net/science/time.htm
>
> However it is still recommended to read the introduction first.
>
> > Are you surprised noone bothers reading through the rest of your paper?
>
> Nothing surprises me, least of all the hostility and elitism I am
> confronted by.

It is earned, in both directions.

>
>
> > > You've only skimmed my papers and pointed out there are no equations.
> > > Those aren't errors. If you find anything more substantial I will
> > > acknowledge that.
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > If you are unable to express your ideas in a mathematical form, you
> > cannot make predictions with them. If you are unable to make
> > predictions, your thoughts are roughly useless.
>
> If my idea says that no space exists at or within the event horizon of
> a blackhole then measurements of the surface area by direct
> electromagnetic interactions will not produce a non-zero measurement.

Your idea is crap.

You have no justification for your idea. In other words, you pulled
something out your ass and expect it to pass.

How do you reconcile what you say vs GR? The gravitational radius of
anything with mass [star] or mass-equivlant [geon] is nonzero. If
there was no space between two opposite points of the horizon, the
black hole would have a radius of 0.

Go to a library and check out a non-lay book on GR that covers black
holes.

>
> Am I right? Experiment will tell us.

No, you are wrong. Experiment isn't needed for now. What you say is in
direct conflict with GR. Space exists inside the horizon, its just
timelike.

>
> I've made that prediction. As far as the use of my thoughts, I think
> they explain quantum phenomena rather intuitively. Try reading my
> stories all the way through.

I can't read your stories all the way through because I realize that
they are expected to be serious and not satire.

>
> > You never did explain to me what Type 2 Malmquist bias is.
>
> I don't know the difference between a Type 2 and Type 1 either. Still
> trying to figure that out.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Two Schwarzschild radii
    ... radius of a black hole, on the other hand, can never move outward at ... So far the observations match the predictions of alternative models well. ... radius, rather than an event horizon, then relative to that surface, ... certainly have a very large energy. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Are Black Holes Stationary?
    ... The horizon consists of nothing at all. ... observation that can identify the event horizon of a black hole. ... A black hole does not have to spin *relative to a space observer* to have ... time passes on a clock positioned on the surface of the spinning object. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Black hole questions
    ... Far outside its horizon, a black hole acts like an ordinary object with the same mass. ... long does it take for the change of the black hole's gravity to reach ... Indeed, an infalling observer cannot locate the horizon via local measurements of any kind, it requires global observations to identify the horizon. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Black holes again.
    ... What would happen to me if I fell into a black hole? ... get closer and closer to the center of the hole, though, you start ... long before you crossed the horizon. ... Penelope sees things quite differently from you. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Can Black Holes move?
    ... horizon of a black hole the space-time explanation is ... the distant observer, to have stopped. ... no thing is stationary at the event horizon, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)